More Posts in: Astrophotography
Hiking in this beautiful region is like a present.Also standing at high elevation and looking to the king of Austria.The first snow the changing coloursand all the combination with the weather cond
A Eurasian owl showing off his muscles as he prepares to take flight to grab a bite to eat.
I just happened to look up at the right time.
One of my favorite waterfalls I've photographed in recent years. deep in the backcountry of Vancouver Island lies this pristine oasis.
These are a highly endangered species, and the rescue center has this young male tiger, which they hope will breed with their already existing female Malayan tiger.
6 Comments
its got a ton of noise but it looks cleanly done ...GET PHOTOSHOP!!! its a priceless tool and if you get just PS not the whole adobe lineup i think i pay $10.oo US a month. it blows up the possibilities of what you can do
Thank you for the feedback. My camera has a lot of noise when taking in dark areas. I don't know if that is because my camera is from 2011 or if I haven't figured it out yet. Will also definitely buy Photoshop.
what iso are you shooting at most of these astrophotographers are shooting anywhere from 100 - 3400 iso so the higher the iso the more noise you will get..at least thats what I've read
ISO: 3200
Apeture: 3.5
Shutter Speed: 30s
(Can't remember what I used for blue hour)
you stars are egg shaped - probably exposed too long. Try 20 seconds instead of 30. Also if you stacked 10-15 shorter exposures you would get much less noise, nicer star shapes and more signal (detail).
Fstoppers has a nice tutorial on stacking the sky with photoshop and blending in the foreground if you search for it. Sequator is a free program that is excellent as well for this. Also lots of tutorials on YouTube.
Only other thing is the focus is slightly off on the stars. But for an initial astro image you did well!
Thank you very much. I will definitely try less exposure time.