Things to Look Out for When Using Light and Shadow in a Landscape Photo

Things to Look Out for When Using Light and Shadow in a Landscape Photo

Taking landscape photos is a wonderful way of spending time. Enjoying the view and the play of light and shadow is inspiring. If you can capture that moment in the best possible way, it becomes even more fun. But watch out where you place the light in the frame.

Light is one of the most important things in photography. After all, photography is often mentioned as writing with light. That's exactly how I like to look at it. There is darkness and as a photographer, I try to place the available light into the frame.

This is how I set up the lights for my model photography. This also works in other types of photography, like landscape photography. Use the dark parts of the landscape that surrounds you as the basis. And see where the light illuminates certain parts of that landscape. As said, it's like writing with the light.

If I look at it from the opposite perspective, by looking at the light and placing the shadows, I find the light to be predominant. It becomes difficult to see the shadows. On top of that, it's more tempting to lift the shadows instead of using them in the composition. The two photos below show exactly what I mean by that. 

We like to look at the beautiful light in landscapes. It results too often in photos where shadows are neglected or forgotten. Or completely removed.

I try to look where the light is flowing through the landscape, by using the dark parts as a starting point. Perhaps its just imagination, but it helps keeping a great balance between light and dark.

This starting position reminds me of how the idea of the rule of thirds originated. Before it was called that, a certain Sir Joshua Reynolds stated that a good composition would have a light part and a dark part, where the ratio between light and dark should be 1:3 in the ideal situation. I wrote an article about the origin of the rule of thirds if you're interested.

I won’t dare to say that this ratio should be used in any situation, but I believe there is some truth in how valid this assertion is. Unfortunately, the assertion has mutated into the idea everything in a photo should have that specific ratio. Hence, the rule of thirds. But that’s beside the point.

What I learned from this bit of history is the need for a good balance between light and dark in a photo. I try to avoid lifting the shadows too much or bringing the highlight down too much. After all, this often results in a flat-looking image with no direction of attention.

By adding light in the darkness, you can add direction and thus a point of interest. Our eyes are always attracted to light, it's the first thing that you will see. Put the subject in the landscape into a patch of light, and it will get the much sought-after attention.

The first thing we see is the light. Because the sun is shining on the slopes in the back, it pulls away all the attention from the subject in the frame, which is obviously the tree.

I waited until the sunlight lit the tree. Now the attention is on the place I want it to be. Compare this photo with the previous one, and you'll understand how important light is.

The benefit of using light in a photo is the ability to hide less interesting things in the darkness. Even if the darkest parts are still full of detail. This way you will be able to photograph a very cluttered landscape without it being too distracted. The clutter is still present, and it will give a good impression of the reality, but it won’t attract too much attention.

Now I think of it, perhaps that’s the reason why Sir Reynolds mentioned two-thirds dark and one-third light. As a matter of fact, you can also take the contrast between dark and light to extremes. In that case, it’s called Clair-obscure, something you probably heard of before.

Making the contrast stronger than reality is just a way to grab the attention of the viewer and directing it towards the right spot. This is called Clair-obscure.

If you take this piece of information about light and dark in a landscape photo seriously, there is one thing you must keep in mind when making a composition. Don’t look at shadows in a light scenery. Think of an image as being dark with light in it. Look at the location of the light, instead of the location of shadows. Where does the light is coming from and where is it going? What parts are illuminated, and what parts aren’t?

You will notice how the eye will follow the light and end up in a certain location within the frame. This is the point of interest, the place where the subject should be positioned in the composition, if possible.

Have you found that spot, look carefully at the surroundings. Especially the edges of the frame because that’s the place where the most problems occur. Often you look at things that are not completely inside the frame. Or you look at things that are sticking from the edges into the frame. Branches, or mountain slopes, or perhaps a farm building. But have you ever thought about light as a distracting element?

The light is amazing. But there is a distraction. A light patch at the upper left. Once you see it, it can't be unseen. Adjusting the panorama crop was enough the leave the disturbance out of the frame. You can see the result in the beginning of the article.

As mentioned, our eyes tend to look at the lightest parts inside a photo. That’s where the attention is drawn too. But if there are similar patches of light near the edge of the frame, our eyes will start to wander toward it. It's just a matter of time before your eyes will jump back and forth from the real point of attention to the distracting part. This will bring a lot of discomfort, even agitation. In the end, the disturbing patches of light will be the only thing you’ll notice.

That’s why you need to keep an eye on the position of light in a frame. Is it in the right spot, and even more important, isn’t there another light spot that is asking for a similar amount of attention? If so, try to remove it from the frame.

Looking at the light and taking shadows for granted makes you easily forget the distracting part in the frame. IN this case at the left bottom corner. I can notice these disturbances more easily if I look at the shadows instead.

Instead of relying on photo editing software, I moved a few steps closer in the field. This way I could leave the illuminated branches at the bottom left out of the frame.

The best thing to do is to check the composition whilst photographing on location. If you can make an adjustment at that moment, this will be the best solution. If that's not possible, try to remove it using a crop in post. Another option is the use of a strong vignette, or you can use the clone brush tools to remove it completely. You can even use tools like generative fill, for that matter. I wrote an article about the possibilities of that amazing tool.

The sunlight is amazing in this flooded forest. But if I look at the shadows, the light patch at the upper right becomes obvious. It get distracting.

By making a local adjustment in Lightroom Classic, I was able to darken the bright patch. Now it's not distracting anymore. 

So, next time you are in the field, photographing a beautiful landscape with amazing light, try to look where the light is flowing through the frame. Avoid light patches at the edge of the frame, and you will grab the attention of the viewer more easily.

This technique is not limited to landscapes, of course. It can be used for every type of photography. Are you aware of the significance of light in such a way? Please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Nando Harmsen's picture

Nando Harmsen is a Dutch photographer that is specialized in wedding and landscape photography. With his roots in the analog photo age he gained an extensive knowledge about photography techniques and equipment, and shares this through his personal blog and many workshops.

Log in or register to post comments
6 Comments

To summarize in one sentence - "photograph the light".

Unfortunately a lot of photographers take the light for granted

Excellent examples to illustrate the points! I started paying more attention to this in recent months, trying to be increasingly intentional about the light in the frame. I definitely have started to notice brighter spots showing up in distracting locations, just like you mentioned!

Next time out, I'll be trying out your approach of looking at the shadows first, and seeing how the light falls across the scene 🙂

Thanks for your comment. enjoy your fresh look at light and shadows. The difference of approach is subtle but it works.

It was the subtlety that made me interested in trying! Those small shifts in thinking or seeing can have big impacts.

I tried out the approach a few days ago just on a walk through the neighbourhood...and it was hard to reset my mind! I genuinely feel that I took a few images I would've missed, or not taken as well, if I hadn't been looking at the world like this.