On Photographing Racists as a Photographer of Color

On Photographing Racists as a Photographer of Color

One of the unique aspects of the Black Lives Matter movement in the last year has been how it has spread to even the smallest of communities. It’s made covering the protests as a minority photographer a wholly different and vastly more frightening experience.

I’ve covered quite a few protests in the New York City area, from Occupy Wall Street to Black Lives Matter in 2014. The tone of a protest in a large city is different; there is inherently a plurality of people and large enough numbers of those people to (generally) dissuade racists from coming out. That’s not always the case, clearly, as many of the protests against George Floyd’s death have shown, but in many of those cases, the threats against photographers come from law enforcement.

In Long Island, the Black Lives Matter movement has taken to the streets of the quiet, mostly white residential neighborhoods that have never seen such forms of protest. It’s not been uncommon to see many residents come out of their houses just to hurl insults at Black Lives Matter protesters in these small towns.

In some cases, I’ve seen groups of “counter-protestors” that have heckled and shouted down the largely peaceful Black Lives Matter groups at these rallies. Their behavior worried me enough that I started to wear a body camera to these events just to capture the way these counter-protestors — actually, white supremacists — treated me, a photographer of color.

This past weekend was the “Long Island Unite Against White Supremacy” march in Wantagh, New York. It was a response to the Capitol riots from days before and specifically targeted towards the disparity in policing on display in that insurrection versus Black Lives Matter protestors. That disparity was on display from the start of the protest, where a large group of police officers, all white, stood around the Trump supporters and chatted with them in a friendly manner, while one of the only interactions the police had with the people rallying against white supremacy was to read them a warning off a printed sheet saying that if they blocked pedestrian or vehicular traffic, they would be arrested. It should also be noted that the group organizing the rally, Long Island Peaceful Protest, had been barred from using a megaphone in the past, but that was no problem for the counter-protestors.

Logically, if the march is against white supremacy, if you’re showing up to protest the march, you’re tacitly indicating you support white supremacy. And that’s what these people who were across the street were doing. I approached them to take some photos, and the response showed a gross demonstration of racism and misunderstanding of photographer’s rights to photograph in public spaces.

You can see that their political affiliations are on full display. They were carrying Trump flags throughout the march, and the person in the video who claimed his father owned the private bank property they were on was wearing Donald Trump socks.

Counter protesters at the "LI Unite Against White Supremacy" rally in Wantagh, New York on Saturday, Jan. 9, 2021.

Right after I kneeled to get this photo, you can see the same organizer about to blast my ears out with a megaphone, only stopping short at the last minute after I put my hand up to block him:

A few minutes after this moment, I tripped over a rock in front of him and his only response was to shout to an officer “I didn’t push him, he tripped” instead of trying to offer a helping hand or ask if I was OK.

It’s this lack of empathy that’s most striking in this crowd. If I was a white photographer, would this group have treated me differently? Would they have immediately told me to go back to the side of the street as the Black Lives Matter folks (in this case, the protest group, Long Island Peaceful Protest)? Would they have threatened me?

It’s an uneasy feeling. I wasn’t wearing any clothing or any markings to show that I was affiliated with either side, though I was still treated like an enemy combatant by one side and embraced with open arms by the other.

It’s telling that the group of Trump supporters wanted to hide their faces from a camera. They didn’t just avoid me, they didn’t talk to TV media that was there as well, unlike the organizers of Long Island Peaceful Protest. They wouldn't share their names for a caption. If your cause is just, you likely won’t be the one hiding from the light of journalists.

Today, I wasn’t physically harmed, but plenty of photographers are harmed on the job. If you’re a photographer of color, those two intersections carry an even greater risk at these kinds of protests.

Wasim Ahmad's picture

Wasim Ahmad is an assistant teaching professor teaching journalism at Quinnipiac University. He's worked at newspapers in Minnesota, Florida and upstate New York, and has previously taught multimedia journalism at Stony Brook University and Syracuse University. He's also worked as a technical specialist at Canon USA for Still/Cinema EOS cameras.

Log in or register to post comments
35 Comments

✊ one people

Massive respect for your courage and composure throughout. Thanks for sharing your experience and insight.

With all due respect, Wasim, let's keep politics out of this site.

Don't like articles about photojournalism? Don't read them.

Problem solved.

But that is the essence of photojournalism. Like El Dooderino - nice nickname btw - says: you don't have to read it and you don't have to comment on it.

Personally I found his perspective very interesting.

Well Eugene there‘s no politics in this article just the experience of a photographer covering a protest. But now that you bring up politics I don’t think I need to take a guess about your political opinion.

This is a totally legitimate topic for a photo site

Wasim, thank you for this article and sharing your experiences of documenting protests. I despair of humanity when I see how some people treat their fellow humans and countrymen.

So far two people have downvoted this - the most balanced and least political comment you could imagine. All you said was "wow it sucks when people are hateful" and two people so far thought "nope, I dislike that statement."

Kinda proves the point, doesn't it.

Indeed your country is full of racists, don't you see it? About half of the voters are not. The other half is. Anyone supporting a person like Trump is either a racist or at least dump. And if I take a look at the congress, I see a lot if people there who still support a racist, soon to be former, president.

"There are about enough white supremacists in America to fill a couple of Joe Biden rallies, no more"

lol!

They were all at the Trump rallies! "Jews will not replace us! " "Blood and soil!!"

C'mon! You can do it Billy! Say it out proud and loud! You know you want to!

"I wasn’t wearing any clothing or any markings to show that I was affiliated with either side, though I was still treated like an enemy combatant by one side and embraced with open arms by the other."

You didn't need any identifying clothing. Obviously, your skin color was enough of a trigger for hate for one side, as opposed to the other.

Photojournalism is important work. Be safe!

What is a "race grifter"?

In this site we should be talking about the color of the photo not the color of the photographer.

So lets see - "as a minority photographer" "threats against photographers come from law enforcement", I don't know of any data to support this claim. How about just be a photographer. If black live do matter, then words and the use of words matter even more. From my perspective this article is weighted with sharp curve. While I think the post is a new low point for Fstoppers, I defend their right to publish. Why? They own it, and the bill of rights grant them this right. Not with standing the freedom of the press. I also defend the writer the right to express his views here, though I think it is poorly written and edited. I am not attacking the writer or Fstoppers, but simply expressing my view. If anyone has a camera (and millions have been sold) citizen journalist are springing up like popcorn. When I view all the protests for the last year, I am amazed how many "camera rigs" video, iphone's, etc etc are in the streets capturing. Like any good video editor, one can cut and paste an event to make it say what the editor wants it to say. I have watched with my eyes BLM folk knock camera and video gear off others. It was disgusting. Do the "white guy: or "right wing" folk do the same as BLM folk? Yes. This is a wonderful time to capture street events of protest of any kind. If I want to make BLM folk look bad, give me a camera and I will show you how, though I would be dishonest in being objective, and the same is true if I go after "white folk" . At my age of 74 I know I carry a certain perspective about life than those in their 30's. I look for honor, authenticity and truth tellers in the visual media. When I see hundreds of Camera phone, amateur video rigs on the streets, discernment is most difficult.

You say "race grifter" as if my race has provided me with some advantage in my life. It has not. With the discrimination and harassment I faced growing up, the government-induced harassment and discrimination after 9/11, and now this, believe me, that's very far from the truth. I wish I didn't have to write articles drawing attention to this problem.

But you did. And at least I am grateful that you did. This is not about politics, this is about human rights. This is about us. You have the undeniable right to talk about it, especially since this is not your first article here and it is also about photography. Please report back in some time when things might have improved after the change of presidency - and if not.

Mr. Ahmad needn't accuse you at all.

You've proven yourself to be a racist white-supremacist with your posts.

Lol @ Candice Owens!

You never had an argument to start with. lol!

I'm commenting from here in the UK, and it's so sad to read these accounts. Where does all this venim come from? But hats off to you for being brave enough to record these events. We have a similar, but not nearly on the same scale, right-wing extreemists here. I just hope sense and fairness will prevail in the coming years. . .

Prove there "aren't any white supremacists".

Either racist or just stupid or both at the same time. What disgusting losers!

I posted plenty of other links as well. Candice Owens is hardly an expert on the extent of white supremacy and, most certainly doesn't speak for all black Americans, which certainly highlights the weakness of your "argument". Our own government has said right-wing extremism (which includes white supremacists) is a greater threat to our country than foreign terrorists.

https://fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf

"That's the trouble with conservatives they believe any old crap people tell them" (like "stolen elections" and pedophile rings in pizza parlor basements, "jade helm" etc)

FIFY

You should take your racist BS to Redstate where you belong.

Still waiting on you to prove your statement "there aren't any white supremacists". Try to remember, I never made any claims about "Santa Claus", so maybe you can try to stay on topic and post some actual evidence. BTW, Candice Owens never said there were no white supremacists, she claimed it wasn't a concern. How did her "Blexit" work out? lol!

Since you continually refuse to prove your claim, I guess the only (racist) loser here seems to be you.

Sad.

Je pense que l'on a publié votre article car vous traitez un sujet à la mode, en revanche vos photos n'ont rien de vraiment percutantes.

Je pense que les photos font un bon travail pour capturer un événement important. Les événements de l'article sont extrêmement pertinents en tant que discussion d'un mouvement social actif qui s'est répandu dans le monde entier. Excusez toutes les erreurs grammaticales, mon français n'est pas très bon.

Les photos journalistiques sont destinées à informer, et non à gagner un prix de design. C'est votre commentaire sur le sujet ici ? Les photos ne vous intéressaient pas ! C'est le sujet qui vous agace !

Oh look! Another troll who doesn't have a clue what the BLM movement is about!

I'm a healthcare professional with over 33 years experience in cardiovascular and pulmonary critical care. I don't smoke. That is a picture of a fictional character from a fictional movie. It's says a lot about you, that you think that is me.

I won't be wasting my time with an intellectually challenged, willfully ignorant racist troll who struggles with reality like yourself.

“One of the unique aspects of the Black Lives Matter movement in the last year has been how it has spread to even the smallest of communities. It’s made covering the protests as a minority photographer a wholly different and vastly more frightening experience.” (Solid opening for any news article. Problem, are you implying that you are in danger from BLM? Bias. Wouldn’t it be better to say, “Covering political protests in the last year…”?)

“In Long Island, the Black Lives Matter movement has taken to the streets of the quiet, mostly white residential neighborhoods that have never seen such forms of protest. It’s not been uncommon to see many residents come out of their houses just to hurl insults at Black Lives Matter protesters in these small towns.” (“…mostly white…neighborhoods” that means they are also somewhat black or somewhat brown? Bias.)

“In some cases, I’ve seen groups of “counter-protestors” that have heckled and shouted down the largely peaceful Black Lives Matter groups at these rallies. Their behavior worried me enough that I started to wear a body camera to these events just to capture the way these counter-protestors — actually, white supremacists — treated me, a photographer of color.” (who are these “counter-protestors” are they not people, why emphasis? Bias.)

And finally, what camera did you use? Lenses? Tripod? Flash? What light conditions? That information would have been relevant in the article posted on site dedicated to photography. By my count, that is an ‘F’ grade. Nothing to brag about for professor of journalism.

And finally, unless your goal is to create discord, the sh*t storm this article has created is exactly why we should avoid posting articles like that on site which tries to cater to the widest audience possible. Don’t you agree?

Canon EOS R with the RF 24-105mm f/4 lens, since you asked.

"About Fstoppers
Fstoppers is an online community aimed at educating and inspiring photographers, videographers, and creative professionals." Straight from "About Us" Nothing about Current Events, Political Opinion, etc. "...online community" so let's keep it a community by not posting divisive opinions...There is a million sites where that kind of articles are welcome, I'm sure I speak for majority of us here, let's reserve this one site for articles about photography.

Also from "About Fstoppers"

"Fstoppers has grown into one of the top resources for photography lighting, gear reviews, business tips, behind the scenes, and industry news."

Kind of seems like a "behind the scenes" type article to me.

There was nothing "divisive" about the author sharing his real life experiences, only the comments from certain commenters here. This article is certainly pertinent to others who may aspire to be, or are already involved in photojournalism, and are not lily-white in skin color. Nobody is forcing you to read these articles and you're free to move on to others that appear less "divisive" to you.

I appreciate the author sharing his experiences here with us