One of the unique aspects of the Black Lives Matter movement in the last year has been how it has spread to even the smallest of communities. It’s made covering the protests as a minority photographer a wholly different and vastly more frightening experience.
I’ve covered quite a few protests in the New York City area, from Occupy Wall Street to Black Lives Matter in 2014. The tone of a protest in a large city is different; there is inherently a plurality of people and large enough numbers of those people to (generally) dissuade racists from coming out. That’s not always the case, clearly, as many of the protests against George Floyd’s death have shown, but in many of those cases, the threats against photographers come from law enforcement.
In Long Island, the Black Lives Matter movement has taken to the streets of the quiet, mostly white residential neighborhoods that have never seen such forms of protest. It’s not been uncommon to see many residents come out of their houses just to hurl insults at Black Lives Matter protesters in these small towns.
In some cases, I’ve seen groups of “counter-protestors” that have heckled and shouted down the largely peaceful Black Lives Matter groups at these rallies. Their behavior worried me enough that I started to wear a body camera to these events just to capture the way these counter-protestors — actually, white supremacists — treated me, a photographer of color.
This past weekend was the “Long Island Unite Against White Supremacy” march in Wantagh, New York. It was a response to the Capitol riots from days before and specifically targeted towards the disparity in policing on display in that insurrection versus Black Lives Matter protestors. That disparity was on display from the start of the protest, where a large group of police officers, all white, stood around the Trump supporters and chatted with them in a friendly manner, while one of the only interactions the police had with the people rallying against white supremacy was to read them a warning off a printed sheet saying that if they blocked pedestrian or vehicular traffic, they would be arrested. It should also be noted that the group organizing the rally, Long Island Peaceful Protest, had been barred from using a megaphone in the past, but that was no problem for the counter-protestors.
Logically, if the march is against white supremacy, if you’re showing up to protest the march, you’re tacitly indicating you support white supremacy. And that’s what these people who were across the street were doing. I approached them to take some photos, and the response showed a gross demonstration of racism and misunderstanding of photographer’s rights to photograph in public spaces.
You can see that their political affiliations are on full display. They were carrying Trump flags throughout the march, and the person in the video who claimed his father owned the private bank property they were on was wearing Donald Trump socks.
Right after I kneeled to get this photo, you can see the same organizer about to blast my ears out with a megaphone, only stopping short at the last minute after I put my hand up to block him:
A few minutes after this moment, I tripped over a rock in front of him and his only response was to shout to an officer “I didn’t push him, he tripped” instead of trying to offer a helping hand or ask if I was OK.
It’s this lack of empathy that’s most striking in this crowd. If I was a white photographer, would this group have treated me differently? Would they have immediately told me to go back to the side of the street as the Black Lives Matter folks (in this case, the protest group, Long Island Peaceful Protest)? Would they have threatened me?
It’s an uneasy feeling. I wasn’t wearing any clothing or any markings to show that I was affiliated with either side, though I was still treated like an enemy combatant by one side and embraced with open arms by the other.
It’s telling that the group of Trump supporters wanted to hide their faces from a camera. They didn’t just avoid me, they didn’t talk to TV media that was there as well, unlike the organizers of Long Island Peaceful Protest. They wouldn't share their names for a caption. If your cause is just, you likely won’t be the one hiding from the light of journalists.
Today, I wasn’t physically harmed, but plenty of photographers are harmed on the job. If you’re a photographer of color, those two intersections carry an even greater risk at these kinds of protests.
Je pense que l'on a publié votre article car vous traitez un sujet à la mode, en revanche vos photos n'ont rien de vraiment percutantes.
Je pense que les photos font un bon travail pour capturer un événement important. Les événements de l'article sont extrêmement pertinents en tant que discussion d'un mouvement social actif qui s'est répandu dans le monde entier. Excusez toutes les erreurs grammaticales, mon français n'est pas très bon.
Les photos journalistiques sont destinées à informer, et non à gagner un prix de design. C'est votre commentaire sur le sujet ici ? Les photos ne vous intéressaient pas ! C'est le sujet qui vous agace !
Oh look! Another troll who doesn't have a clue what the BLM movement is about!
I'm a healthcare professional with over 33 years experience in cardiovascular and pulmonary critical care. I don't smoke. That is a picture of a fictional character from a fictional movie. It's says a lot about you, that you think that is me.
I won't be wasting my time with an intellectually challenged, willfully ignorant racist troll who struggles with reality like yourself.
I'm wondering if he can be any more immature.
I doubt it, but I'm sure he'll try!
“One of the unique aspects of the Black Lives Matter movement in the last year has been how it has spread to even the smallest of communities. It’s made covering the protests as a minority photographer a wholly different and vastly more frightening experience.” (Solid opening for any news article. Problem, are you implying that you are in danger from BLM? Bias. Wouldn’t it be better to say, “Covering political protests in the last year…”?)
“In Long Island, the Black Lives Matter movement has taken to the streets of the quiet, mostly white residential neighborhoods that have never seen such forms of protest. It’s not been uncommon to see many residents come out of their houses just to hurl insults at Black Lives Matter protesters in these small towns.” (“…mostly white…neighborhoods” that means they are also somewhat black or somewhat brown? Bias.)
“In some cases, I’ve seen groups of “counter-protestors” that have heckled and shouted down the largely peaceful Black Lives Matter groups at these rallies. Their behavior worried me enough that I started to wear a body camera to these events just to capture the way these counter-protestors — actually, white supremacists — treated me, a photographer of color.” (who are these “counter-protestors” are they not people, why emphasis? Bias.)
And finally, what camera did you use? Lenses? Tripod? Flash? What light conditions? That information would have been relevant in the article posted on site dedicated to photography. By my count, that is an ‘F’ grade. Nothing to brag about for professor of journalism.
And finally, unless your goal is to create discord, the sh*t storm this article has created is exactly why we should avoid posting articles like that on site which tries to cater to the widest audience possible. Don’t you agree?
Canon EOS R with the RF 24-105mm f/4 lens, since you asked.
"About Fstoppers
Fstoppers is an online community aimed at educating and inspiring photographers, videographers, and creative professionals." Straight from "About Us" Nothing about Current Events, Political Opinion, etc. "...online community" so let's keep it a community by not posting divisive opinions...There is a million sites where that kind of articles are welcome, I'm sure I speak for majority of us here, let's reserve this one site for articles about photography.
Also from "About Fstoppers"
"Fstoppers has grown into one of the top resources for photography lighting, gear reviews, business tips, behind the scenes, and industry news."
Kind of seems like a "behind the scenes" type article to me.
There was nothing "divisive" about the author sharing his real life experiences, only the comments from certain commenters here. This article is certainly pertinent to others who may aspire to be, or are already involved in photojournalism, and are not lily-white in skin color. Nobody is forcing you to read these articles and you're free to move on to others that appear less "divisive" to you.
I appreciate the author sharing his experiences here with us
Tim, I speak only for myself. There is a million sites where discussing politics not only appropriate but welcome. This site is or at least was, dedicated to photography. I am sure this site's readers subscribe to every kind of political view out there but we can enjoy each other's love for photography better if don't bring politics in to it. Incidentally, thank you for the advice, I assume you will take advantage of it yourself as well and go somewhere else. "You're free to choose, friend! Isn't that lovely?" Right?
To keep asking people to explain further just shows how ignorant you are.
Perhaps you don't have news papers where you live.
My gosh Tim. Are you really that ignorant? Have you even read the first sentence of the article? If you haven't here is is:
"One of the unique aspects of the Black Lives Matter movement in the last year has been how it has spread to even the smallest of communities".
That sentence alone proves their hate is spreading like cancer that needs to be eradicated. Black lives matter is a load of crap, because all lives matter, every single one. Even actors like "Denzel Washington" who is black admits their hate is a result of their culture and had nothing to do with racism. More black people are killed by other black people than any other race. What is really sad is when people are too scared to admit the ugly truth. So nothing will change and ignorance will continue.
Tim. Once again, unlike you, I speak for myself and only for myself. Out of what must be thousands of site members, there are only 3 or 4 members who have continued to participate in this discussion, a clear evidence that the rest are only interested in photography and not in politics.
No need to be rude Tim. Judging by your reaction, I was right. Oh and don't call me a hypocrite since you don't know a single thing about me. I was born on the 'other' side of the world and I know what people like you are capable of. Entire countries full of good people have suffered because of narrowminded servile fools like you. So get your self to Cuba, Venezuela or N. Korea where people like you will be welcomed with open arms. Live there for a while and then perhaps we can compare notes on what my 'fucking' business is.
Tim.
You are absolutely correct, you can write whatever you want you also have a right to be considerate member of the site dedicated to photography and not political discourse. You have a right to be a gentleman and not get personal with your writings. Like a small boy hiding behind his mothers' skirts. The fact that you brought up the 'right' issue tells me you don't have a clue what the difference is between having a right and exercising it. And just so you know, I was born and lived part of my life under soviet dictatorship so I do know a whole deal more about it then you or "Professor of journalism" who wrote the article.
Tim..Tim. Stooping to expletives is a sign of a dim mind. I tell you what...I am bored with you. You are boring. Not a single original idea, repeating the same tropes is boring comrade.
If Wasim is a Professor, then I am the President of the US. His article was neither news (because it is biased) nor opinion. And since it did not convey some new approach for shooting crowds at political rallies or did not discuss using this or that lens or this or that camera setting, it definitely did not belong on photography site.
See you at re-education camp. History will decide which side of the fence you and I going to be...comrade. ;-)