I totally disagree, Dror, respectfully. The fact that Mike included the ceiling light makes the light on the chairs, books and bed, believable. Even though they aren't visible, I would expect there are more similar lights that could account for everything (even if they didn't).
Agree with Dror. There are some weird light patches on the ceiling up of rollers, I understand you got many lights around but... any light patch need to be proved with the light source and should give GI and reflect on other surfaces aswell, like walls, rollers, etc. Too much fake light, Flowers in full light but no light or speculars on the coffee table. Dissapointing, really.
i understand your lighting technique and approach, but it still has to be believable. This one is not.
I totally disagree, Dror, respectfully. The fact that Mike included the ceiling light makes the light on the chairs, books and bed, believable. Even though they aren't visible, I would expect there are more similar lights that could account for everything (even if they didn't).
Agree with Dror. There are some weird light patches on the ceiling up of rollers, I understand you got many lights around but... any light patch need to be proved with the light source and should give GI and reflect on other surfaces aswell, like walls, rollers, etc. Too much fake light, Flowers in full light but no light or speculars on the coffee table. Dissapointing, really.