Fujifilm X-H2S: Performance Powerhouse With Ergonomic Drawbacks

The Fujifilm X-H2S is a powerful option for photographers who need quick, reliable performance in high-pressure situations. For those who shoot large volumes, this camera could make a noticeable difference in your process.

Coming to you from Dylan Goldby, this insightful video highlights the real-world application of the Fujifilm X-H2S, specifically from the perspective of a high-volume photographer. Goldby explains how he transitioned from the X-T5 to the X-H2S, not out of desire but necessity. For him, the X-T5's 40-megapixel sensor, while impressive, became a burden due to the large file sizes, making it inefficient for his event-heavy workload. The X-H2S, with its 26-megapixel sensor, strikes a better balance between image quality and file manageability, a critical factor when dealing with thousands of images daily.

He points out that the fast readout speed of the stacked sensor and the use of CFExpress cards significantly improve workflow, allowing for rapid image processing and quicker turnarounds during demanding events. However, Goldby is candid about his ergonomic struggles with the X-H2S. Despite its professional orientation, he finds the grip too large and the control layout less intuitive compared to the XT series. These ergonomic issues, especially the non-pressable command dials and mushy focus lever, detract from the user experience, making the camera less enjoyable to use over long periods.

For photographers accustomed to Fujifilm’s traditional camera bodies, the shift to the X-H2S might feel like a step back in terms of usability. Goldby emphasizes that while the X-H2S excels in performance, it lacks the tactile joy that the X-T series provides. The larger grip and different button placements make the X-H2S feel cumbersome, especially during long shoots. This could be a significant consideration if you prioritize comfort and ease of use in your gear. The video serves as a reminder that not every upgrade is a straight improvement, and personal preference plays a substantial role in camera choice. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Goldby.

Alex Cooke's picture

Alex Cooke is a Cleveland-based portrait, events, and landscape photographer. He holds an M.S. in Applied Mathematics and a doctorate in Music Composition. He is also an avid equestrian.

Log in or register to post comments
4 Comments

It's funny. I have the exact opposite reaction to the X-H2S vs the traditional X-T Series. Coming from Canon to save weight, I found the X-T Series frustrating and the controls too fiddly. Every time I took my X-T3 out of the bag I had to take time to review all dial settings because they were constantly being knocked about. The other thing was the X-T grip size was way too small, especially with longer, heavier lenses I use for sports and event photography. For my hands, Olympus has the best grip shape and size in the business. But the X-H Series is a close second, significantly better for me than the small grip of the X-T Series

For the way I shoot, the X-H2S is completely intuitive, was easy to customize, completely reliable and simple. In fact, had Fuji not released this camera, I likely would have gone back to Canon and put up with the weight penalty that caused me to switch to Fuji to begin with.

Yeah that guy is making stuff up.

Throw it in Silent mode and tweak the settings to your liking and any small issues disappear.

That camera is literally the best kept secret on the market and all because a bunch of clowns believe their 24 MP FF sensor with horrible readout speeds are more “professional”.

Do you know how ridiculous and douchey you sound? SMFH

Until Fuji get their auto focus disaster in check, especially for video and subject tracking, due to the defective AI predictive focus crap they introduced, any of their cameras with the current-generation Xtrans sensor / processor should NOT be relied upon for "professional work".