Is the Leica SL3 Worth the Investment? A Comprehensive Review

When it comes to high-end cameras, the Leica SL3 stands out due to its cutting-edge features and impressive build quality. This new flagship model from Leica aims to cater to professionals and enthusiasts alike, offering a blend of advanced technology and the classic Leica feel. 

Coming to you from Christopher Frost, this detailed video explores the Leica SL3’s capabilities and performance. The SL3 is built around a new image-stabilized, full frame, backside-illuminated, 60-megapixel sensor. This sensor offers a base ISO of 100, with an impressive range extending from 50 to 100,000. It boasts a dynamic range of about 15 stops, making it a powerful tool for capturing high-contrast scenes. The autofocus system has been upgraded with phase detect, contrast detect, and object detection, allowing for quicker and more accurate focusing. However, it’s noted that the autofocus can struggle with fast-moving subjects, making it less suitable for sports photography.

The camera’s processor, the Maestro 4, supports faster shooting speeds up to 15 frames per second, with 8K video capabilities, 4K at 60 fps, and Full HD at 120 fps. This makes it a versatile choice for both still photography and videography. Yet, there are some limitations in burst speed when maintaining autofocus or using a mechanical shutter, which could be a drawback for action photography. The camera also includes in-body image stabilization, which is a significant advantage when using Leica’s prime lenses, ensuring steady shots even in challenging conditions.

One of the standout features of the SL3 is its robust build quality. Made with a magnesium top plate and aluminum bottom plate, it is designed to withstand harsh environments. The camera has an IP54 rating for dust and water resistance and can operate in temperatures ranging from -40 to 70 degrees Celsius. The new tiltable screen and high-resolution viewfinder enhance usability, although some may find the joystick control less than optimal due to its limited directional capability.

The Leica SL3 also shines in its customizability. The redesigned menu system and customizable buttons make it user-friendly and adaptable to individual preferences. However, the battery life is somewhat limited, with an estimated 400 shots per charge, which may require carrying extra batteries for extended shoots. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Frost.

Alex Cooke's picture

Alex Cooke is a Cleveland-based portrait, events, and landscape photographer. He holds an M.S. in Applied Mathematics and a doctorate in Music Composition. He is also an avid equestrian.

Log in or register to post comments
11 Comments

PURE click bait

Hard to see why this costs twice as much as Sony's a7RV.

Red dot.

Ok so let’s try to put it in terms you might understand….”hard to see why a whopper is more expensive than a Big Mac”. Get it now?

No. I don't do fast food. As far as I'm concerned, they're both equally repulsive.

One thing that people forget is that Leica cameras retain their value better than almost any other brand. It is a consideration to factor in. My one complaint with the SL3 is the on-off button. I hate it. I'll take the SL2's switch any day. Still, I really appreciate the incredible weather sealing and shooting in inclement weather is no problem, other than having to clean the lens when shooting into a driving rain.

--- "One thing that people forget is that Leica cameras retain their value better than almost any other brand."

It's not that people forget, it's we don’t care. We buy cameras to shoot with and not treat them like a collector's item. And, at least for Leica's previous model SL2, its resale value isn't any better than the popular brands from Sony and Canon. It just may seem better because they are expensive to begin with it. But, its resale value is actually lower.

Below are used to original retail values. Used $ sourced from MPB.com.

Leica SL2 - Used $3300 avg, Retail $7000 = 47%
Sony a9II - Used $2500 avg, Retail $4500 = 56%
Canon R5 - Used $2600 avg, Retail $3900 = 67%

Who cares about the MPB price. It's how much the USER can sell it to MPB.

Lol! The math will work out the same way.

the Leica Sl3 is intriguing its dumbed down but its also lacking in AF, FPS, lighter Leica lens choices and besides the reduced flash sync, bulk, 14 bit change in FPS and the OLD SENSOR!
Its a new camera with 3-5 year old technology, the magic trick is your money disappears before you eyes.
The on off switch on the SONY A1is the worst when you put the camera in your backpack or sling bag the switch catches on the bag and turns on then when you go to use the camera the battery is dead. Also the batteries on the Sony loose their power alternatively a Hasselblad battery will keep its full charge for months. Get it right Sony....

I have to say I found this review to be somewhat inconsistent especially regarding file “noise” at high ISO. Whilst I concede he may have a point regarding JPEGs; you cannot compare the Leica DNG files to Canon or Sony raw files which have been subjected to in-camera noise filters, so their raw files whilst appearing “cleaner” are less pliable in post. Certainly in my experience with both Leica and Canon raw files.
As regards Mr Popes comments below I kind of agree the button is a bit of a pfaff, but my main complaint is the huge white LEICA text on the front. I have taped it up along with the red dot for “street ninja” mode…..