We Review DXO PureRAW 5

We Review DXO PureRAW 5

We spent some time on the new DxO PureRAW 5 when it was announced in February, but now it's out and I've had a chance to give it a run.

For those unfamiliar with the product, DxO PureRAW is a very powerful raw image processor. Now in its 5th generation, PureRAW is revered by photographers for its ability to clean up lens distortion and aberrations, remove noise, and sharpen images.

This latest version is claimed to push noise reduction and sharpening even further and now supports masks so you can target areas of an image for treatment, leaving other parts alone. PureRAW is not an image editor, but more of a preparer for your raw files, so you get more out of them.

DxO PureRAW 5 includes the third generation of DxO’s original neural-network-powered raw processing engine for Bayer and X-Trans sensors. Four years ago, DxO pioneered the use of machine learning to perform denoising and demosaicing simultaneously, unlocking the potential of AI and far exceeding man-made algorithms. Today, this latest DeepPRIME 3 incorporates a third process: residual chromatic shifts at a pixel level. Thanks to the data it draws from DxO’s exclusive DxO Modules, DeepPRIME 3 resolves chromatic aberration as part of the raw conversion process. DxO also says the software has gotten a significant speed boost.

Using DXO PureRAW 5

Once it is installed, there are multiple ways to use the software. Most photographers will use the software standalone and then hand the updated raw file to an editor. Many will use it as a Lightroom plugin, performing further processing steps on the image, then with the option of handing it off to Photoshop or another editor.

I tried the software with a variety of raw files and found this update powerful.

Here's a shot taken with a Fuji X100VI:

Taken at f/16 with an ISO of 250, the cleanup is pretty dramatic. The image is more focused (processed version is to the right of the split screen), which is easily visible in the water, the rocks, and the person.

This is a Hasselblad X2D file, taken at ISO 64 in low light at sunset. The image has been considerably sharpened, and the noise has been cleaned up. As good as the Hasselblad is, it's better after PureRAW treatment.

This is a Sony a7 IV file. Look at the rocks to the left, and you can see PureRAW has eliminated the chromatic aberration on the rock edge.

At the center part of the image, you can easily see how the rocks are cleaned up and de-noised.

We can only show you the JPEG here, but here's an enlargement of the image above to get you a better look at the improvement.

As mentioned, there are now manual controls that let you push the image a bit more if you desire, and I used the "strong" option for lens sharpness, finding it was effective and did no damage.

You could really see PureRAW earning its keep on this very low light image shot in Utah with a Lumix camera. There's a lot of color noise which is easy to see, yet PureRAW eliminated the noise, saving this image.

Local Adjustments

One of the new features in PureRAW 5 is a masking function. Photographers now have the option to focus the levels of denoising and detail extraction on specific parts of the image and tailor levels of sharpening exactly as required.

Users can draw multiple masks and adjust the Force Details and Luminance sliders to dial exactly what they need. In addition, it’s possible to target sharpening more precisely, focusing on specific parts of the image.

I tried it out, and it worked pretty well, but I thought it created needless work when it shouldn't need to. The bracket keys don't work to adjust the size of the brush, which is standard in most photo editors; you have to type the size into the interface, which is a needless task easily fixed with key commands. I'd love to see some AI put to work in this feature, like letting it select the sky or other objects, saving photographers the tedious painting. This feature feels a bit unfinished but could be very powerful if DxO rethought it a bit.

Summing Up

PureRAW 5 is an evolution of a product that was already a must-have for serious photographers. It improves every image that is fed to it. It can remove noise cleanly from high ISO images, sharpen images that were slightly defocused or soft because of optical issues. At the same time, as you could see, nasty optical aberrations are easily cleaned up.

I saw some slight improvements from PureRAW 4, and version 5 does push sharpening and noise reduction to a visible improvement. If you are satisfied with DxO 3 or 4, I would not upgrade to get the local adjustments feature yet, but I'm confident it will improve.

What I Liked

  • World-class noise reduction and sharpening

  • The best optical correction software there is

  • Easy to use

  • Excellent integration with Lightroom

What Could Be Improved

  • The local adjustment feature seems half-baked. While I can see the need to make local adjustments with some images, the masks should include AI generation for things like the sky, buildings, or geographical features.

Where to Get PureRAW5

If you'd like to test it, a 14-day free trial is available from the DXO website

A perpetual license for macOS and Windows machines can be purchased from the DxO website at the following prices:

  • New license: $119.99
  • Upgrade: $79.99 

DxO PureRAW 5 comes with unlimited access and no subscription is required.

Fstoppers readers can save an additional 15% with the code FSTOPPERS15.

Log in or register to post comments
6 Comments

Sooo, the Lightroom plugin is the same cost as the standalone version - pass.

They are one and the same. Depending on your workflow, you can either open the files within PR5 directly, or add them to Lightroom and then use the plugin to process the RAW files. I prefer to process my RAW files in PR5 first and then export into LrC for any further tweaking. YMMV.

It's starting to sound a lot like Topaz Photo AI! That's a good thing, I think. I use Topaz because it allows me to back off from over sharpening and noise control in those "Too much" situations. And let's be honest, the difference between 1st and 2nd place is so small, it doesn't really matter all that much. Detailed fine control is where it's at, in my eyes.

DxO's lens/camera profiles are the bee's knees. And, the NR (DeepPRIME XD2s) is both better and almost 2x faster than Adobe's AI Denoise, at least on my M1 Max Mac Studio. For a high-volume high-ISO event shooter like me, DxO is a huge time-saver.

TBH, there not much in it time-wise between LrC's AI Denoise and PR5 on my Dell G16. ISTR there was an issue with Adobe optimizations and Apple silicon. Is that still happening? It certainly seems so, bearing in mind the XD2s is the slower of the 2 options from PR5 as well.

On my M1 Max Mac Studio with 32 GPU cores, DeepPRIME performance is slightly faster when set to GPU than to Auto or ANE. So, even when PhotoLab and Lightroom are both leaning on the GPU, DP XD2s is still almost twice as fast. When you're processing hundreds or thousands of images at once, as I do, this can make the difference between processing during dinner or overnight.