This Free Software From Sony Could Make Gimbals Redundant

Filmmaker Mark Bone has just discovered that some free software from Sony can stabilize footage from his FX9 to the point that he’s wondering how often he will ever need to use a gimbal in the future. Check out this short video.

Bone puts the stabilization offered by Sony Catalyst Browse, Sony’s free clip management tool, up against that provided by the Warp Stabilization offered by Adobe Premiere. As Bone explains, “it’s night and day.”

While the FX9 doesn’t support in-camera stabilization, Catalyst Browse takes the metadata from the camera’s gyroscope that is embedded into every file. Catalyst Browse then recalculates the movement of the camera and creates stabilized footage than can then be exported. The processing seems to be quite rapid.

Unfortunately, before you get too excited, Catalyst Browse does not have the same functionality with footage shot on Sony hybrid cameras as they lack the same internal gyroscope. As one of the comments to Bone’s video notes: “When you hear that catalyst doesn’t stabilize a7 footage and your heart breaks.”

Watch to the end to find out why Sony might not be able to offer a simple solution for internal raw.

Have you tried using Sony Catalyst Browse? Leave your thoughts in the comments below.

Log in or register to post comments

11 Comments

FocusPulling (.com)'s picture

This kind of claim comes up every once in a while by people who have no understanding of the 180-degree shutter rule, why it it exists, what it looks like (clue: motion blur), and why electronic stabilization of this sort is completely useless.

Tovi Andurrson's picture

YouTuber garbage. No more thank you.

Kevin Famuyiro's picture

No snark, but what kind of content would you like to see from Youtube content creators, and what could Mark Bone be doing better? I thought the video was fine enough, but then again, I'm not really a Sony user.

nick turner's picture

Probably something at least within the realm of relatability would be a good start. Not many people would have access to an FX9, and even less would be putting it on a gimbal.

Just me's picture

If you don't mind some cropping... (and warping and no motion blur...)

William Faucher's picture

I was going to comment on this but you beat me to it. You're absolutely correct. You could always stabilize in post in Nuke, or even After effects, with great results, if you're willing to crop. I don't know about most people but I don't like cropping video unless I have to.

Chris Slagle's picture

For the relatively small cost of a gimbal, I'd much rather save time on the back end and not have to endlessly stabilize footage and deal with cropping.

Stephen Schrock's picture

not free. link takes you to a product page to find out who sells it.

William Salopek's picture

Free? The link goes to a page that says "where to buy". And please, the title is CLICK BAIT. Please refrain. But...if more cameras with gyros were supported, and if some cropping could be planned in advance (stabilizing "slight" wobbles doesn't crop much), this really could be a great solution to stabilization in certain situations. It sounds the same as "Reelsteady Go", which uses a GoPro's (v5,6,7,8) gyros to do a magnificent/quick job of stabilization.