Why You Should Be Offended By The Pirating of Photoshop

Why You Should Be Offended By The Pirating of Photoshop

Okay, I get it. Hundreds of thousands of you are offended by Adobe's choice to go to the Creative Cloud. I understand, I was leading the forefront with my torch in hand. Renting software sounds like a ludicrous statement, especially when half the software you won't even use. So why shouldn't you just pirate it?

The answer is simple, because your career forbids you to.

So whether you're an amateur photographer just starting out, or on the cusp of opening your second studio location, you should know better. You're in this industry for one thing, to create; and if all goes well, make a living creating photos for yourself and for your clients. Nobody joins the art industry to make a ton of money. In fact, jokes are thrown around constantly about the idea of a starving artist. You're not on this career path to become rich and famous, because there is very little money to be had in the art community. And the fame? Lets talk the fame.

When I was at WPPI this year, I had a long discussion with Jeremy Cowart at the Framed Awards. I was absolutely star struck, but playing it off as cool as I could. Eventually I asked him how he handles all of his success and his adoring fans. He said simply, he doesn't. Sure, Cowart is considered a genius to many of us, and many of would kill to have a couple hours to pick his brain. But the fact remains, Jeremy Cowart is still buying his own groceries, and can still be seen walking the streets alone in his hometown of Nashville. Jeremy Cowart is only famous to the market of Photography, and that market is far smaller than you might imagine.

So to get back on point, why shouldn't you pirate Photoshop? It's simple, because you don't want people stealing your images and using them for whatever they'd like. In fact, you spend so much time making sure people don't steal your images or ideas. You constantly complain when someone asks you to shoot their band for free. You're up in arms when a concert gives you a ticket to their show in exchange for event photography. You want to the art industry to be taken seriously, yet you have no problems with stealing from Adobe to save a couple bucks. By pirating Photoshop, the only thing you're telling the art community is that you don't care about them at all.

 

"But Adobe is a multi million dollar company!"

 

Absolutely, they are, and they deserve every dollar they make. They have built their company from the ground up by being innovative and tailoring to the market's needs. I was just discussing this with a photographer over the weekend. Does anyone remember PaintShop Pro? I loved that program ten years ago, even more so than Photoshop. Where is PaintShop Pro now? It still exists, if you believe it. But it's faded off into obscurity, because they were no longer able to meet the demands that the industry wanted. Adobe surpassed them on every level because Adobe is constantly asking themselves "What can we do next?".

Adobe has continuously impressed us with the technology they've been able to create. When content aware fill was introduced, my brain nearly exploded with shock. Even their latest tool, Camera Shake Reduction is straight out of science fiction. I'm convinced they're about 2 years behind from making the CSI-esque tool "Enhance" a reality.

They're constantly adapting and improving, more so than any software company in existence. You need to reward them for their hard work and diligence. Sure, the Creative Cloud is a pain in the ass. I too, like having the disc in front of me and the appearance of owning the software. But when you start using Creative Cloud, you'll find that it wasn't built to piss you off, it was build to help push innovations through at a much faster rate. It was built to increase your workflow, by allowing you to download Premiere Pro with the click of a button, or to search through thousands of fonts that they're offering up for free (Over $200,000 market value worth apparently).

Adobe is making millions with their products, but that is no reason for you to boycott them as long as they're still creating fantastic products. If your photography career begins to take off and you start making good money at it, does that give anyone else the right to kick in your door and take your things?

 

"But $50/$20 a month is a crazy price to put on software"

 

Is it though? I mean, thats $600 a year for all of Adobe's software, and $240 a year for just Photoshop. And sure that seems like a lot, however I just purchased a Canon 5d Mark III 2 weeks ago. That camera costs well over 3,000 dollars, and have I noticed an astonishing improvement over my work from when I was shooting with the Canon 5d Mark II? Absolutely not. The photos on my website are well over 2 weeks old, and my printed portfolios have remained unchanged since the purchase of this new camera. Why is that? Because it's a tool, and with how I shoot photos, the Mark III and Mark II do not make any difference to my work whatsoever. I wanted it because I wanted it, not because I needed it.

I NEED Photoshop. It has worked its way so far into my workflow that there is no turning back. Photoshop has helped improve my work far more than the Canon 5d Mark III ever will, and the Mark III cost far more than I've ever paid Adobe for anything. So why is okay to spend thousands of dollars to Nikon/Canon annually without much thought and the idea of paying Adobe for their cutting edge tools absurd. Is it because you can't illegally download the Mark III firmware to your Mark II and be set? Good riddance.

If you do some math on the topic, the Cloud actually turns out to be cheaper. If you're only using Photoshop, you can get it right now for $20 a month. Buying Photoshop CS6 (an old version no less) right out the door costs $666 on Amazon. So by that math, it'll take you 2.7 years before Photoshop CC has reached its value from the boxed editions of the software. Within those 2.7 years, Adobe will certainly have at least one, if not two new versions of the software available for you to use. So how are you not saving money with this plan?

Like most people, I spend $9.99 on Netflix a month, $9 on Spotify Premium monthly, and $9 on Hulu Plus monthly. How have those services helped my career as a photographer? If anything, they've hurt it far more than helped it. I use those tools to procrastinate and get away from the work I should be doing.

 

So I'll leave you with this. Piracy is going to happen, that's the nature of the beast. If you can build something, someone out there can find a way to tear it all down. So it all really comes down to who you're supporting. Are you going to stand at the sidelines and cheer for the guys who are creating things beyond your own imagination, or are you going to root for the people who come in looking to destroy that idea and innovation? Being a creative mind myself, I'll gladly choose the former.

[PSA - I am not endorsed, sponsored or accredited to Adobe in anyway whatsoever. All of the opinions in this article are of my own and no one elses. This article was written in like...15 minutes in response to this.]

Image via iStockPhoto

Log in or register to post comments

286 Comments

Tam Nguyen's picture

That featured image says, "DAFUQ?"

I won't pirate it. But I will consider cracking it so I can use it on my terms. How about that?

Lee Morris's picture

And still pay the monthly fee? Seems fair to me

Yes, of course. Yes.

Pickpocketing someone's wallet, vs. accessing their bank accounts online. Stealing is stealing, doesn't matter how you rename it.

I'm not stealing anything. I'm basically buying a tool and making it so I can use it any time I want to instead of having to connect it to the Internet between certain intervals. I have nothing against paying for software as good as Adobe's, but this DRM (which is basically what it is) doesn't work well with how I do things. So for me it's either stick to CS6, or buy CC and make it work like CS6.

Zach Sutton's picture

How are you paying for it if you're using a crack to bypass its connection with Adobe? Are you just writing a check for $700 and mailing it to Adobe?

I sign up for a subscription, the sub will keep getting paid. I just want to use the software the way I want to.

Lee Morris's picture

Maybe I don't understand the limitations of the cloud... How do you want to use it that they don't allow?

I explained it in one of the other CC-threads, but I need to "reconnect" ever so often to be able to use the software. In certain periods of time I will not have Internet access available. I'm mostly a nature photographer and spend a lot of time in the summers outdoors, far away from Internet connections (but still have access to power & my laptop). 3G doesn't have coverage in many of these areas, and the way I understand it without Internet for certain time periods I won't be able to use Photoshop CC.

if you buy a year subscription, you need to log in once every 6 months. I'm sorry but if you are out of the internet for 6 months, but using your laptop to edit photoshop of Antartic Penguins (who probably have 4g phones to go with their nice tuxes) you have other problems (such as probably a lack of food in your ice hut)

You need to get away from technology for a while.

Uhm Steven if you are getting away from technology, why are you using photoshop?

All you have to do is is roughly about 20 minutes of internet connectivity a YEAR to keep CC active. How is this inconvenient?

People literally stop their cars on the highway to steal wifi.

The way I read your statement (which is very unclear to begin with), that him being away from the internet for long periods of time is a problem. And to that, I said you need to get away from it for a while if you think that's a problem.

Perhaps he works on safaris, expeditions or other trips that take longer than 30 days with limited or no internet. Without a monthly check to the mothership, Photoshop CC shuts off. (Granted, this reality is shrinking... even McMurdo Sound in Antartica has Internet Access now.)

One can argue that you edit the photos when you get home, but this is where CS6 would work better than the state-of-the-art that Adobe offers.

Pages