Sitting front row for some of the best aerial views in the world, airline pilots (both private and commercial) have taken their selfies and photos to Instagram with some astonishing smartphone imagery from all over the world. It is undeniable that these images are unique by their own right, as pilots have access to views over the average passenger. However, the question stands, are these insta-snaps harmless or are they a despicable jeopardy of safety for passengers and crew?
Piloting commercial airlines comes with its share of strict regulations that limit the use of certain devices in the cockpit. In some cases, even casual conversation is prohibited as pilots are expected to keep a "sterile cockpit" during the most critical parts of flight — specifically takeoff and landing. In a recent expose by Quartz, pilots have been breaking this rule in the name of Instagram. Over the course of six months, Quartz monitored the Instagram accounts of hundreds of pilots, collecting photos and videos of individuals sitting in the pilot's seat. Many of these images exemplify the breaking of some of the FAA's most fundamental rules regarding use of electronic devices while piloting commercial aircraft.
It isn't Fstoppers' intention to incriminate any of these pilots or to tarnish the overall profession, so we've chosen to withhold the identities of these 'gramming pilots. It almost goes without saying though, we're fans of photography and we find a few of these images visually striking. However, the facts are in — unauthorized cockpit activity, including taking photos during takeoff and landing, is incredibly dangerous. Violations of the sterile cockpit rule have already resulted in multiple casualties, including the most recent in 2009 where the crash of Colgan Air Flight 3407 resulted in 49 deaths in Buffalo, New York. Even still, pilots seem to be giving in to the urge to break these guidelines, in some cases brazenly posting selfies during critical flight moments — time to land this plane #lmtas.
The aviation community is naturally in an emotional uproar over these images. David Yanofsky, journalist for Quartz commented, "Some have directed those emotions towards me, or my employer, others have directed them towards other pilots." He continued to say there is a very distinct difference between commercial pilots who are in charge of safely transporting paying passengers and all other types of flying. The stance of his article was to illustrate the obvious dangers of breaking FAA protocol for a few social media likes.
Now I'll admit, as a passenger I rarely stow my electric devices during commercial flights. I'm definitely that guy that has to be told by the flight attendant to put my phone away. With the recent approval to use devices in "airplane mode," this is my thought: how are they going to know I'm texting, Instagramming or just playing Fruit Ninja? I can't be the only one messaging and Ubering for a ride while we're on approach. That being said, it's highly hypocritical for me to pass any kind of judgment on these captains of the sky. But then again, the only thing I'm piloting is this third Bloody Mary and my never ending battle for use of the arm rest — not a commercial airline full of passengers.
With the ease and accessibility of smartphone photography, or iPhoneography, it can be argued that mere seconds are used to snap a quick shot then later posted to Instagram. But the fact of the matter is that rules and regulations established by the FAA while piloting commercial airliners are in place for a reason. Breaking these restrictions has resulted in casualties in the past and, sadly, probably will in the future. So I once again present my question: is the beauty and unique quality of these images worth breaking a few rules?
[via quartz]
Interesting points, though I do think during the cruising altitudes, there shouldnt be any problem. I agree about the critical phases of flight (Taxi, Takeoff and Landing) and how that should be awarded the full attention of both pilots. My father was a pilot and a few times I used to join him in the cockpit (or jump seat) for a 14 hour flight. My God, can it get boring (after the excitement of the buttons being pushed during take off and landing) ;)
First of all, Colgan 3407 had instances of sterile cockpit violations, but that was not the causal factor. The pilots did not monitor their airspeed, flew the plane into a stall and exacerbated it by pulling back on the elevator. Second of all, the simple answer to your final question is: no. It may take "mere seconds" to snap the picture, but I can name you at least ten accidents off the top of my head in which the time between the beginning of the problem and a fatal crash was "mere seconds." Takeoff and landing are by far the most dangerous portions of the flight, with the highest workload and the smallest margin for error. If you're not five steps ahead of the plane and the environment, you're dead.
agree 100%
The workload during critical phases is significantly reduced by the presence of two pilots. I don't think one pilot taking a picture on a VMC day is going to lead to the crashing of any airliners.
It doesn't matter if it's VFR or IFR. The pilot flying *and* the pilot not flying have specific duties that the safety of the airliner depends upon. I don't want a copilot missing calling minimums because he's taking a picture. Hundreds of accidents have occurred because a pilot lost situational awareness and events unfolded before they regained it and got control of the situation.
I kind of agree here. After all its more a factor of rules being broken rather then justifying breaking them. FAA has these regulations in place for a purpose.
<----Me Now, this has been going on long before Instagram. Probably since the invention of the airplane and camera. Let me just say that I belong to ALPA ( the AirLine Pilots Association) and we have a photo contest every year, and the images are always stunning. Were they shot in violation of an FAR? I don't know, I was not in the flight deck to know. Maybe we all use film and not electronic cameras? As usual, this more sensational news to stir up the pot! Maybe Ebola will come back and we can focus on something truly life threatening (what ever did happen to that epidemic anyway?).