Will Off Camera Flash Make The iPhone a Professional Camera?

The day has finally come when photographers can sync their powerful off-camera flashes with their Apple iPhone using Profoto's new AirX syncing system. Being the skeptic I am, I had to see for myself if using 500 Ws of powerful strobe light with your cell phone was simply a gimmick or potentially an industry game-changer. Today, I'm left swallowing my pride. 

Now, I know what many of you are thinking: it's the same exact thought I have had for years. Yes, cell phones are extremely convenient, and yes, you can create professional-looking images with minimal gear as long as your natural light is sufficient. However, the fact that cell phones are only around 12 megapixels (with tiny sensors too) and are unable to sync with the powerful flash systems we have grown accustomed to using, using the iPhone for professional photography isn't a viable solution for the fulltime photographer. Regardless of how many iPhone photoshoots we have posted on the Fstoppers YouTube Channel, I understand the limitations of "iPhoneography" all too well. 

There are also other limitations and shortcomings that come with shooting on your phone, like workflow issues, transferring images, long-term storage of images, resolution, proprietary file types, lack of raw options, dynamic range, lack of fast lens options, interrupting phone calls, and many other things that make the DSLR and mirrorless options still so much more desirable. I understand all of that. However, for me, one of the most limiting aspects of a phone camera is its inability to sync with flash.

The Profoto Air X app lets you control every aspect of your image

About a month or two ago, I received an email from Protofo announcing their new AirX software. Basically, AirX is an iPhone app that allows your phone's camera to communicate with Profoto's B10, B10 Plus, C1 and C1 Plus flashes through Bluetooth. Previously released software allowed photographers to use their strobes with their phone cameras, but many of these apps were severely limited to simply using the flash's modeling lamp or only syncing a small sliver of flash to the final captured image. When Profoto announced that their AirX app could utilize all of your strobe's actual flash power with your iPhone at shutter speeds up to 1/25,000 of a second, I was of course a bit skeptical. How could a phone camera actually capture all of a flash's output when the camera doesn't have a shutter?

Some of my favorite images using an iPhone 11 Pro with the Profoto B10 Plus and AirX

To be honest, I'm still not 100% sure how Profoto pulled off this feat. The iPhone X and 11 cameras both claim to have electronic global shutters, which means the camera can pull all the data of the sensor off instantly. Most DSLRs and mirrorless cameras can't do this and instead rely on a physical shutter to capture portions of the sensor. Having a global electronic shutter on a camera is the holy grail of camera innovation, and it will be more groundbreaking than removing the mirror from the DSLR. The last few iPhones apparently have this type of shutter, but what's crazy is the AirX app can also work on the older iPhone 7, which suffers from rolling shutter. Again, I'm not entirely sure how this whole process works, but it's probably most similar to the high-speed sync function on your professional camera when your shutter is set above 1/200th of a second. Whatever is going on, it's pretty effective, as I was easily able to overpower the sun by shooting with a shutter as fast as 1/2,000th of a second at ISO 32 on the iPhone. 

Correction (9/2/2020): Despite my research suggesting the iPhone now has a global shutter, the engineers at Profoto have informed me that no iPhone has a global shutter at this moment. This means Profoto's app using AirX is not simply syncing their flash which is captured all at once by the phone's sensor. Instead, the process is much more complicated and requires complex Bluetooth syncing, a process that has actually been patented by Profoto. To read more about how AirX was designed and how it is now being used with xenon flash tubes, check out this article on Medium by Profoto VP of Technology Tobias Lindbäck

Below are a few images taken during my bridal shoot with the lovely Mya Puryear. Mya is an amazingly talented broadway dancer and singer from New York City, and it's pretty awesome to have the privilege to photographer her in the actual dress she wore on her wedding day.  As you can see, exposing for the scene left Mya completely underexposed, while exposing for Mya left her dress and the overall scene totally blown out. This is where flash comes in handy. By correctly exposing for my scene, even at a fast shutter of 1/2,000th of a second, I was easily able to light Mya independently of the ambient light, which resulted in an image that was both balanced and full of detail. Shooting this way also gives your images more of a high-end fashion look. That's not to say the natural light images aren't usable, but in this very bright environment, I think the highlights are just a little too bright for my liking. 

Exposed for scene, exposed for bride, and both exposed with flash

As you can see in the images above, the Profoto B10 Plus was easily able to overpower the bright four o'clock sunlight, and in fact, I still had two more stops of light at my disposal! Using flash with your photography isn't only about overpowering the sun, though. Sometimes, it's nice to give your images a more dramatic look even when shooting in the shade, where the light is even and soft. In this set of images below, you can again see the range of possibilities when shooting with natural light exposed for the background, natural light exposed for your subject, and strobe light overpowering the ambient light slightly. With dark skin against a bright white dress, it's often hard to use the image exposed for the dress, because Mya simply goes too dark. However, I really like both the middle natural light shot and the more dramatic strobe shot on the right. Being able to pull off both these looks on a shoot is super important to me, and it's crazy I'm able to do this with just my cell phone. 

Natural light exposed for dress, natural light exposed for bride, flash adds dramatic look

The final shooting situation was definitely the most dramatic from this session. I wanted to see how the iPhone handled lower-light situations when paired up with the Profoto B10 Plus set to very low power. For this shoot, we headed to a local marina and photographed Mya against the setting sun. As you can see in the video above, the LED modeling lamp on the strobe still wasn't quite powerful enough to give the exposure I was desiring, but just a little pop of flash was enough to keep the sky dark and dramatic. This is a great example of why constant lights like LED panels are often not as versatile as a strobe light. Strobes are much more flexible when it comes to overpowering the sun and adding just a touch of light into a dimly lit scene. 

All images straight out of camera: shot on iPhone 11 Pro with Profoto B10 Plus

So, what is my overall verdict? Even though I think the iPhone still has some major limitations when compared to much more expensive DSLR and mirrorless cameras, I am absolutely blown away by the overall final product coming off my cell phone. Yes, there is a slight delay when shooting with Bluetooth, and yes, I'm very much aware that the Profoto B10 Plus is twice the cost of my iPhone 11 Pro. However, for me, this is the beginning of the future for many photographers and visual artists. If you primarily post to Instagram or you want to be able to improve your iPhone photography dramatically with a single accessory, Profoto's AirX app opens the doors for a lot of possibilities. Is it perfect? No. Is it the best we've ever been able to do at this moment in time? Yes! As someone who already owns an iPhone and owns quite a few Profoto products, I'm super excited to have the option of syncing my phone to my strobes for those quick moments that I just need something to look "finished" and uploaded straight to the internet or a client. If global electronic shutters now allow us to sync our flashes to our phones, the last piece of the puzzle lies with increased quality and lens options with our cameras. And with the rumored iPhone 12 having four total lenses, the days of using solely using a cell phone for professional photography are getting even closer. 

If you're passionate about taking your photography to the next level but aren't sure where to dive in, check out the Well-Rounded Photographer tutorial where you can learn eight different genres of photography in one place. If you purchase it now, or any of our other tutorials, you can save a 15% by using "ARTICLE" at checkout. 

Patrick Hall's picture

Patrick Hall is a founder of Fstoppers.com and a photographer based out of Charleston, South Carolina.

Log in or register to post comments
75 Comments
Previous comments

Well...if they market it as a professional camera (LOL) then there's a 'possibility.' But remember, it's the 12 inches behind the (so-called) camera.

Hopefully Profoto can include this capability in there next version of the A1X, an A2X if you will. The C1 Plus is too underpowered and the B10/B10 Plus are great but overkill for many subjects. An A2X would be perfect run and gun lighting for photojournalism. Thanks for the review Patrick!

I think the technology is cool, and I would definitely use it....if I already had profoto lights. The only unrealistic part of this is the idea that someone is going to use this is they don't already have the lights. They are just so expensive. But something more powerful and midifiable than the C1

Hi Patrick I have the iPhone 11 Pro and one B10 but somehow I missed the update of the app. Did the update and it works like a dream!

My question is, will the app work with two flashes?

"Oh, it's a 2k light system". Man, a 50 bucks LED could do a pretty good job too. Don't be attached to the light's price, just read de post and start to think outside the box

Think outside the box, now isn’t that a trait that would make the world a better place if everyone did it.

It's not the camera that's professional its the photographer. A professional photographer will choose the best equipment required to get the result they need be it phone or a top of the range dslr or a large format film camera.
personally I'd use a point & shoot compact over a phone any day. Horses for courses

Proper use of lighting will make anyone a better photographer. No kit or piece of gear will make you a professional. Your body of work and the clients you've been hired by make you a professional. On the matter of a cell phone making you a professional photographer? HAahahahaha, not unless you're on my set to order coffee. Let's stop with the cell phone crap, it's barely a camera. Please, don't flood me with a ton of your cell phone photos, try printing that crap poster size. Show up to a paying gig with a phone someday, see how that goes for you.

Something missing in all this for professional photographers is the experience. If I showed up on the kinds of jobs we do (mostly commercial work, advertising, and some commercial architecture and interiors) with my smartphone I'd be laughed out of a job.

It really doesn't matter if the tool is technically able to do it. There are impressions with the client, they have expectations of the experience. I often have an assistant with me carrying gear for this very reason even when I could have done the whole job, my clients pay a premium, they expect a premium experience. They expect me or my photographers to come off as professionals focused on the creative direction and not sweating the little details, messing with lights or grip too much.

A biplane will get you from a to b but when an executive flies through a private airport you can bet they will be on a private jet, they will get executive treatment and wait in a very nice lounge with free snacks and personal service. They will carry nothing themselves to the jet unless they want to and there will be no TSA hassles.

If the executive showed up and the pilot said don't mind my trash from lunch on the seats, just push that bag of laundry to the side, oh and sorry about the french fries on the floor, the executive paying for private jet service would likely not pay at all even if you got them where they intended to go on time. At best they would expect a big refund.

My point is I don't really care if my camera phone can do the job, its still in inappropriate device for most work we do. I've had customers 15 years ago who refused to work with photographers who had not gone digital, 20 years ago I had clients who refused to work with photographers who did go digital earlier than they were ready to have in their experience. Now shooting with film is considered a boutique experience with older professional cameras but no one is going to be happy if I whipped out a Kodak 126 Instamatic.

When we shoot in a studio, clients expect craft service, catering, a stylist (or several), set dresser, make-up artist, etc. The models expect to have a dressing room with a makeup counter and proper lights, they expect to see assistants, talk with our studio manager, see art directors and other creatives. And often depending on the client the photographer doesn't enter the scene until everything is ready to go if we are using higher-end models or brought in a top photographer. There is music picked to align with the set design and mood of the shoot. It's a whole production, preplanned, sometimes rehearsed so that the actual shoot goes smoothly and productively and meetings to plan out the client's expectations.

Again, if we pulled out our smartphones they would maybe be used like preshoot Polaroids. Today we have wireless big screen TV's posting live images from the main camera and if we are shooting video of the shoot or for production use, that's being shown live on screens and laptops too. Even the models on set get 72 in live-view verticle monitors to see how their poses are working.

Regardless of location or studio using a smartphone would be considered a fun interruption to the real shooting work.

It doesn't matter that the phone can do it, it sometimes matters more or at least just as much that the presentation and trappings align with client expectations. I found this to be true when I used to shoot weddings and engagements for better clients too. They expect a certain level of service, they expect multiple cameras, they appreciated music that they preselected playing, wine or champagne, comfortable seating in attractive rooms, well-developed websites and image presentation rooms, etc.

Completely missing the point, they aren’t claiming anyone should be using this setup, it’s just a showcase, an experiment of sort. At least you got to write a 5000 word essay about it though.

Let's be fair. He only wrote 651 words. Not even close to 5000 words.

lol

This a great proof of concept but as a travel photographer I also enjoy this as something that can be used.

But for events, people want their photos right now. I can see this being perfect for this. In the past I would use an Instax to give them photos to show right then and there. Now while doing a shoot I can do a quick shot with the phone to share for social media and tag them right away.

If you are not thinking of this as a great tool to for marketing on the fly while everyone else is talking about the event then you are not thinking in the right mindset.

What a SILLY question, does off camera make any camera a pro camera...NO the camera it's self does not change and their are times when flash is not used also does not change the camera and if you can consider it a pro-camera, it's like saying if you put stripes on a horse does it become a zebra

Ahhhhhh no.

I think that this is not likely to replace the professional image because the answer to iPhone is "print it". For web based stuff, however, I believe that what will happen is that it will enable iPhone photographers to become better photographers. If the big brand camera companies do not rush to make it possible to use speedlights with a smart phone (of their manufacture), then they may lose the edge. Kudos to Profoto for taking this imaginative step, can't imagine how they could patent it, however, it is just a Bluetooth signal for crying out loud.

The iPhone is already a professional camera. I know this because I use mine to make professional photos for scientific purposes. Perhaps the question is whether off-camera flash will make the iPhone a more versatile professional camera. Obviously it will, just as professional lighting does with other professional cameras. The next question is, why did I waste my time answering this inane question?

Well...I guess I'll keep using my "real" camera, as I don't use Profoto or an iPhone! 😂

I think putting real in quotes implies it's not real. Maybe just say real camera, to make your point.

Mopeds are fun too, as long as nobody sees you riding one. My clients would disrespect me if they saw me with lighting and an iPhone for capturing. I will say that camera manufacturers have been asleep at the wheel, and Apple is forcing them to improve their products. Look what Apple has done since the first iPhone in 2007. I also think the smartphone should be called something different. The worst performing feature of a smartphone is the PHONE. Great article, but I will pass on working with off-camera lighting with my phone. Although, I have bellied up at a bar and used someone else's phone for side light to show off a cocktail a few times.

"The worst performing feature of a smartphone is the PHONE"

That is the Gods honest truth right there.

Is this compatible with Iphone only? How about android. Usually,some photographers use there android phone for photography.

a lot of android phones have good cameras like Samsung and Huawei. Not sure if you've heard about this flash but a review is posted here about it. Here's the link https://fstoppers.com/review/reviewing-cpflash-550w-mobile-flash-smartph...

Hey Brad James, I also see that. Something interesting about their flash.

Thank you for the info brad james.Let me check this