AI-generated real estate listing photos are showing up on major property websites, and buyers have no way to tell they're fake. In California, a law requiring disclosure already exists, and agents are still ignoring it.
Coming to you from Martin Wong, this eye-opening video walks through a real listing Wong found in his email, one where the exterior of the house shown in the main photo is a white-painted home that bears almost no resemblance to what the property actually looks like. The neighboring house in the AI image has a doorway that doesn't exist in reality. The real neighbor's house has two large windows and one small one. The AI version replaced one of those windows with a full doorway, on a property the seller doesn't even own. Wong also flags that the far drone shot shows a completely blue house with doors that would require removing an entire wall to install. These aren't minor touch-ups. They are fabricated structures.
The interior is just as misleading. Wong points out a kitchen where the AI image shows three cabinet doors in the back where only two exist in the actual house. The square footage implied by the generated images simply doesn't match what's there. The listing describes it as a "prime fixer opportunity," sold as-is, cash or hard money preferred, at $550,000 for under 800 square feet with one bath and two beds. None of the listing description mentions that the photos were AI-generated. Wong notes that California's Assembly Bill 723, which took effect in October, requires real estate brokers and salespeople to include a disclosure when digitally altered images are used in property advertising. This listing has no such disclosure, which means it's in direct violation of the law.
What makes this worth paying attention to is the scale of the problem. Wong mentions that multiple friends currently shopping for homes have run into this repeatedly, across different listings and different areas. The legal framework in California is newer than you might expect given how long AI image tools have been widely available, and most other states have nothing comparable on the books yet. There's also a practical argument Wong makes that's hard to dismiss: if someone drives out to tour a house expecting the images they saw online, discovers something completely different, and walks away, the agent has burned a lead and their own credibility in a single showing. The deceptive approach isn't just unethical; it doesn't even work as a sales strategy.
Wong also gets into more detail on specific images from the listing side by side with real photos, which is worth seeing firsthand rather than just reading about. Check out the video above for the full breakdown from Wong.
No comments yet