ASIAIR: The Little Box That's Changed Astrophotography Big-Time

ASIAIR: The Little Box That's Changed Astrophotography Big-Time

Astrophotography can be divided into two camps: terrestrial and deep space. Both can be equally challenging for different reasons. But recent advances in technology have also made both more attainable and enjoyable. 

Terrestrial astrophotography, as its name suggests, is the practice of photographing the night sky with a foreground anchored on earth. It’s the more accessible and less equipment dependent of the two, requiring only a camera, lens, and tripod. Planning a composition with the backdrop of the Milky Way or other celestial objects has always been the hardest part of terrestrial astrophotography. But in the last decade, a slew of computer and smartphone apps have helped all photographers realize new possibilities of achieving amazing images of landscapes coupled with our galaxy, near-earth comets, and even solar eclipses.

Deep space astrophotography focuses mostly on astronomical objects (nebulae, galaxies, star clusters) outside our solar system and without foregrounds altogether. It has inherently come with a larger investment in time and equipment. The use of an automated tracking mount is nearly imperative, and control over that mount and the peripherals attached to it has necessitated the use of a computer. Portable, economical tracking mounts are relatively new, but these have only solved one-half of the equation.

The Problem With Astrophotography

The problem with deep space astrophotography has always been one of equipment. There are thousands of unique products made by hundreds of manufacturers. Getting all these disparate items to communicate with one another and work together can be a wholly frustrating endeavor. The fact that there are multiple astronomy interface standards makes this more complicated. Nothing is truly plugged and play, so getting things to work properly can take an enormous amount of effort and constant troubleshooting. The use of a computer running specialized programs has been the only way for consumers to get all of their peripherals to run simultaneously. 

For those of us without dark skies in our backyard or a backyard altogether, entering into deep space astrophotography has been a challenge. The enormity and sheer mass of traditional astronomy equipment present a significant barrier as well, one that led me to sell off all of the equipment my father and I had accumulated in our mutual venture into amateur astronomy, as I sought a better solution.

The Solution

By 2018, the proliferation of small tracking mounts had necessitated the next evolution in portable astrophotography. With the success of miniaturizing the complex mechanics of larger more accurate tracking mounts, came the need to miniaturize the computing side in kind. Multiple individual solutions made their debut, like Astroberry and Stellarmate, but the standout has been the ZWO ASIAIR, now in its third generation. Imagine the ability to automate nearly every function of astrophotography wirelessly from your smartphone or tablet. This was the next evolution in electronically assisted astronomy (EAA).

With these new products, it's now possible for an amateur astronomer to fit their entire setup into a camera bag, rather than the trunk of a car. The ASIAIR in particular allows for the seamless integration of multiple accessories, to expand the efficacy of astrophotography. Things like autofocus units, filter wheels, guide cameras, and tracking mounts, all can be easily controlled wirelessly and automated with little to no input.

Why Is It Significant? 

Products like the ASIAIR have helped to streamline the acquisition of astro images. Anyone with a smartphone can now be an amateur astronomer; that's a powerful message to send to prospective customers. And in ZWO’s case, they included support for both Canon and Nikon cameras, opening the world of electronically assisted astronomy to hobbyist photographers. This inclusion of support for the most popular digital cameras allows one to incrementally creep into the wider world of electronically assisted astronomy. What's more, they are assured complete compatibility when pairing products in the ZWO ecosystem. That’s a huge deal for hobbyists who don't want to spend time researching product compatibility and troubleshooting those issues. With a minimum investment, new customers have access to a range of features that have only been available to serious astronomers.

Plate Solving

For deep space photography, in particular, the ASIAIR makes the initial setup nearly foolproof. By utilizing something called plate solving, it can examine images from your camera during polar aligning to help you to achieve near-perfect alignment in a matter of minutes. This reduces the human element of error introduced into the process. Plate solving can further assist when you’ve managed to find your intended target, examining the image to determine where in the sky your setup is pointed. If your star tracking mount has go-to capability, you’ll never need to manually find an object ever again. 

Fully Wireless Control

Touching anything connected to the camera at any time during an astrophotography session could disturb the entire process, knocking the rig out of polar alignment, or moving the field of view away from your intended target. But with the ASIAIR, since everything is wireless, you can adjust all the camera settings, take practice photos, and even process those photos, without ever stepping near your setup. Even for hobbyists who are running a more permanent setup, say in their backyard, the included Ethernet port allows for a direct connection to a stationary home router or pocket WiFi router, meaning one could theoretically have access to their entire astronomy setup from the comfort of the entire house. 


Once you’ve polar aligned, taken preview images, and are ready to shoot, the ASIAIR has an autorun feature that is like an intervalometer on steroids. You can program just about every parameter you can think of for an entire night of imaging. Included in this feature, is the ability for the ASIAIR to store the data you collect in neatly collated folders on its local storage.


All of the features mentioned above don’t need extra equipment to work. But that's where things get way more interesting. With the ASIAIR, you can add guiding cameras, which can help with the sustained tracking of the mount. There's an option to add an automatic focusing unit, which can even be adapted for use with any kind of lens/camera combo. And lastly, if you’re serious, you can even add an automatic filter wheel that will rotate filters in the correct position based on the specific set of images you’re capturing.

If the above features aren’t enough, the ASIAIR can also do live stacking, dithering, planetary imaging, automatic meridian flips, and it even has a planning mode for imaging multiple targets on the same night.

My Specific Use Case

I first started using the ASIAIR with the iOptron Skyguider Pro, and it also works equally well with the Skywatcher Star Adventurer. Initially, I was amazed at the way it expedited the achievement of precise polar alignment. The wireless control and autorun features were a huge boon as well. After a while, I even added an autoguiding camera and scope to improve the tracking over a night's imaging run. The problem with all of these trackers is the same, however. They are manual, meaning you must physically move the camera to your intended target. 

The biggest breakthrough came when I paired it with the Skywatcher AZ-GTi. As far as I know, the AZ-GTi is the smallest and most affordable fully GOTO mount on the market today. With a few off-the-shelf products and an upgraded equatorial firmware by Skywatcher, this setup is the most capable fully automated astrophotography rig that can fit into my camera backpack. The most important part for me at least is that I can take it anywhere, and the setup and teardown can happen in moments. This would have been impossible before. Although the portability of the AZ-GTi is a large part of my success story, not having to bring a laptop and the power requirements to run it cannot be ignored. I can run everything off of two small smartphone battery banks which I already had.

The best part of this system is its portability. I live in a big city, so I must travel at least 30 minutes away from home to get decent images. After the initial setup and polar alignment, I can relax in my car and control and monitor everything without any physical interaction. Collecting images is a long process, and there's nothing better than reclining inside while watching Netflix until I’m ready to go home.


As an amateur astronomer and avid astrophotographer, the ASIAIR has transformed my relationship with these hobbies. I wouldn’t dream of shooting deep space objects without using one. There's just not much more to want out of this device. ZWO has carefully crafted a product that meets the needs of the smartphone and tablet generation. And they have breathed new life into a traditionally stuffy, exceedingly DIY, and sometimes overly complicated hobby. 

Log in or register to post comments
Gilmour Dickson's picture

Good article. I am a huge fan of the ASIAir pro. To really get the full use of it of course you have to be in the zwo ecosystem. I am fine with that but not everyone is. I like how I can eliminate the laptop from my imaging. It makes everything much easier and more compact.

Scott Donschikowski's picture

Yes! Thats the whole reason I bought one as well. It makes imaging way less laborious.

A d.'s picture

ZWO has released some flawed versions of the ASIAir including the WiFi hobbled ASIAir Pro. Their devices also lock you in to their gear. It’s a nice idea but poor execution with poor support. There are better options from DIY Astroberry (ASIAir is basically a RasberryPi) to more expensive windows based PrimaLuce Eagle.

Scott Donschikowski's picture

I think the marketers from ZWO were clairvoyant enough to consider that they could corner the market on these astro-computers. They already were making in-roads into the community with their cameras, so making a device that could control all the products they make was completely academic. The point wasn't to make the most completely open product like astroberry or stellarmate, it was to gain new customers with a less-DIY focused piece of kit, like nearly everything else in astronomy.

Gideon Ariel's picture

Great article. I need step by step how to use the "live" mode in ASIAIR

Spy Black's picture

The AZ-GTi was indeed the smallest GOTO mount, but it was a hack that needed a firmware update, and some parts from the Star Adventurer. Sky-Watcher finally made the hybrid into a portable full-blown EQ GOTO mount in the form of the Star Adventurer GTI.

I suspect iOptron will follow suit with an evolution of their SkyGuider Pro. BTW, you need to add a second counterweight to your AZ-GTi setup, as you need to get the counterweights closer to the center of gravity to improve your tracking. Counterweights don't add to total load capacity.

The ASIAIR is not "the little box that's changed astrophotography big time", that would be the Astroberry/Stellarmate (KStars/Ekos) system. ZWO has literally ripped off the KStars/Ekos system and crippled it to work with only ASI, Canon, and Nikon cameras. The KStars/Ekos system works with far more DSLR, mirrorless, and cooled astro cams, as you can see below. There's also drivers for a multitude of astro hardware, focusers, mounts, observatory domes, etc. I'm really surprised ZWO took that low road, as they make a good series of astro cams and accessories, and are otherwise a reputable firm. ASIAIR is a low blow. This fellow made a video pointing some of this out as well:

So as you can see below, KStars/Ekos offers you a far greater choice of cameras to work with. Not all DSLR models from all manufacturers work, but I know of no other platform that offers support for the likes of Sony, Fuji and Pentax camera, for example. ASIAIR omits all these options.

Scott Donschikowski's picture

I don't disagree with you on many of your points. However, Astroberry in particular, although feature rich, has a very limited audience because of its complexity. 3/5 comments on this video lament that they cant even get Astroberry to run.
So although it has more features, its entirely more complicated. Whereas with the ASIAIR product line, although you are limited in features and cameras, it uniquely simple in an world where complicated DIY is the norm.
The ASIAIR opens up this hobby to the masses, and that it why it has changed astrophotography big time.

Spy Black's picture

The simplicity you're referring to is a copy of the Stellarmate interface, which ZWO equally clipped. So whatever simplicity you see in ASIAIR can be equally found in Stellarmate. The Stellarmate/Astroberry system was the first to implement an entire astrophotography station in a Raspberry Pi, not ASIAIR. ZWO simply clipped Stellarmate and marketed it heavily. The standard Ekos interface is indeed more complicated, but so is full-blown astrophotography. ;-)

Michael Marcelletti's picture

The simplest deep sky photography option is the Pentax Astrotracrer.

William Salopek's picture

Simpler, yes, but with less capability. Pixel 6 is even simpler but with even less capability. Definitely a neat feature on the Pentax though.

Scott Donschikowski's picture


The astrotracer function just has too many limitations for it to be a viable alternative.
1) Single exposures are impossible with a foreground.
2) Exposure times are limited by the lens used, as the sensor has to travel faster with a decreased field of view. Far less than 1 minute with lenses over 50mm.
3) Not wide angle friendly. The corners exhibit extreme trailing over 45 seconds with lenses from 15-24mm.
4) Atmospheric thermal turbulence will interfere with any pixel-shift mode and cause blurring.
5) The built in timelapse mode will not work with astrotracer turned on

Hector Belfort's picture

I’d love to do Astrophotography but every time I look into it I realise again how complex it is. There are expensive scopes now like Evo-scope which are simpler products. Image quality not as good as a good telescope but plenty of reviews say it’s far less frustrating and more consistent results. My take on it in general is that it’s far too complicated. I think they are missing out in a lot of sales by not making the whole thing simpler from a user perspective. I know many Astro people love the complication diy nature of it. It’s like computers / phones before Steve Jobs came along .

Scott Donschikowski's picture

I totally agree with you Hector.
However things are changing in the industry albeit incrementally.
Sky-Watcher just introduced a new affordable, portable GOTO mount which was designed for astrophotography and can be controlled by a smartphone or tablet. It doesnt even need a product like the ASIAIR, although results would be improved.
And yes the new Evolux product line is their entry level wide-field telescope line for amateur astrophotographers. The 62ED model in particular is among the most inexpensive 400mm lenses available today.