Here's how I failed at becoming a full-time photographer.
In 2021, I quit my job, moved out of my apartment, and embarked on a 13-month full-time travel and photography journey. I had hoped to prolong this time by increasing my photography income, but after 13 months, the savings I had dedicated to this adventure had run out.
There are a few reasons this endeavor wasn't a financial success.
Too Many Changes at Once
Before I began my travels, I had gradually established my photography business as a side venture, in addition to my primary job as a software developer, over more than ten years. It didn't make me rich, but it financed most of my travels and my photography equipment, with a small profit on top. And the best thing is that, since I didn't have to pay my other bills with my photography, it was still a lot of fun.
However, time-wise, I was limited, and my income from photography had stagnated for a few years. And because my girlfriend and I had planned to spend a year traveling for some time already, this was the perfect opportunity to make landscape photography my main job. I thought that by devoting all my effort to photography, I'd be able to build my business to a point where it could sustain my new nomadic life.
It might have worked better without all the other changes. But especially the part about full-time travel became a huge hindrance in focusing on my photography. Constantly planning the next trip and the next place to stay takes a lot of time, especially if you are a landscape photographer who also has to research photo locations for every destination. It ate up most of my office hours on the road, and I wasn't able to work on all the other aspects of running a successful photography business.
Therefore, a better approach to transitioning into full-time photography would have been to do so gradually. I could have reduced the time spent on my main job first and allocated it to my photography instead. And while some people can make the nomadic lifestyle work, for me, this change was one of the biggest obstacles. Don't get me wrong, all those travels were a lot of fun. But it also made it hard to focus on the business side of photography.
More Photos Don’t Mean More Income
And this business side of photography is more than taking photos. I thought taking more pictures, putting them up for sale through agencies and for print, publishing regular YouTube videos, and increasing my social media presence would also increase sales. But this part made zero difference.
I photographed nearly every sunrise and sunset, documenting most of them on social media and in my YouTube videos. Yet my subscriber count didn't budge. Up to that time, I had produced nearly one video a week without much success for four years; now, I was creating two videos a week without success. Guess what: just doing more of the thing that doesn't make you successful doesn't make you successful. Although the common advice is to just keep posting regularly, in a saturated market, this only works for a few. I had already expected that, but it was still an interesting experiment.
Now, what about the fact that more photos don't necessarily equal more sales? At least not without the proper marketing. Becoming a good marketer is perhaps the most critical aspect of running a successful photography business. If I had invested the time I spent taking more photos in learning about marketing and creating a strategy that fits my photography, I would have certainly earned more money.
But to be honest, my dream was not to spend more time in front of my laptop creating leads and working on my sales. The dream was to travel and capture unforgettable moments in photos.
Not Taking It Seriously Enough
When I quit my job, I had already planned to return to software development after some time. Although it's a nine-to-five job, I like it, and nowadays, solving problems in that field has become as much of a creative outlet for me as my photography.
So photography, even during those 13 months of travel, has never really been a Plan A. While I never lacked the dedication to get up in the middle of the night and head out to take a photo, I certainly lacked the dedication to spend time in the office. In the back of my mind, I always knew I would return to being a software developer once the money ran out, so it was easy to say no to the less enjoyable aspects of being a full-time photographer.
On the other hand, had I had to make it work and treated it as a job on which I had to depend, there would have been no excuses.
It’s Not Only About Photography
Ultimately, becoming a full-time photographer is more about building a business than it is about photography itself. Before this year of travel, I worked 40 hours a week in my nine-to-five job and spent my weekends on photography.
If I had wanted to make this work, I should have treated photography as a business and replaced most of those 40 hours by focusing on it and becoming a pro at building a business. Having a passion for photography is not enough.
The Market Is Saturated
There is no denying that the photography market of today is highly saturated. So, selling your photography is becoming increasingly complex. What worked ten years ago may not work today, and what works today may not work ten years from now. So, you must be prepared to adapt constantly.
For example, seven years ago, I made most of my photographic income by selling photography licenses through agencies. By now, around 25% of that income remains. Another thing that could earn you good money was photography workshops. While this market is still expanding, it is already becoming more challenging for less well-known photographers like me to book a workshop in full.
Conclusion
It's essential to recognize that traveling the world, photographing exotic places, and sharing those images on social media will not necessarily make you a successful photographer, even if you are skilled at the craft of photography. It's the unseen work that eventually pays your bills.
That's why, for me, a solid nine-to-five isn't such a bad thing after all. It allows me to focus entirely on my photography when I'm traveling and out in the field without worrying about the next sale I might or might not create from the photos I capture.
Although it didn't work for me, if you know what you're getting into, you can still be successful as a photographer. There are enough examples. Just don't take such a naive approach as I did.
Great article, I can understand your experience. I did gallery sales years ago; it was a different time, I used mostly 4x5. I loved seeing those big prints, but I didn't care for the business aspects required. Also, like you I'm a software developer and yes, it is a satisfying profession. After I retire next year, I'll go back to doing photography full time, but I no longer care about selling anything.
Did you forget there was a pandemic? I wasn't locked down then, but people and businesses were holding onto their money in case a time of no income were to occur. My new camera fund got me through 2 momths with no paycheck, in 2021, caused by a business shutdown.
Think about it. How much did the pandemic scare away business or cause clients to budget elsewhere? You may have been on the right track had that not been a factor.
I have done photography now for almost 50 years, and opened my first studio47 years ago. People come to me frequently saying they want to become photographers, and what should they study in school. Get a business degree, with a minor in accounting is my reply. This is an extremely difficult profession to earn an income in, and very few - extremely few - arise to more than just getting along. Then consider that landscape and fine art are the most competitive fields in photography. Extremely few in that niche group ever make it financially, and most of those subsidize their income from actual photography by operating tour groups masquerading as workshops. Studio photographers will do some better depending on their demographic space. Even then though, it's a very tough slog.
I tried to be pro before the digital age. I had 2 jobs in photography. One artsy-fartsy. The other to pay the bills. I was always busy, but the money wasn't there. For reasons not related to success of being a pro, I walked away from it. I've been an "enthusiast" since '96. I became a teacher, instead. I wonder if I'd have been able to do online tutorials and reviews, would that have led to bigger success?
I know a few guys that have done well in photography, Bruce Barnbaum, John Sexton, and there are others. But if you take into account how many millions of people there are who proclaim themselves to be pro, the percentage is miniscule. I lamented to one of those guys one time that it was a whole lot easier to make an outstanding image that it was to sell. it. Boy, was that correct.
My "outstanding" work came in the part of my job where images didn’t sell, but I was paid for my time. Not that my art work was bad, it received high praise. It just took a lot of time and exposure to sell. I wasn't making a living off of my photos, alone.
This article is awesome. I love that you laid out in front of you what you consider a failure. That openness is commendable. It does seem incredibly hard to make a living as a landscape photographer. I used to want to do that, but quickly came to realize that simply selling your photos not only requires marketing, but what you may think are your best or most dramatic photos probably won't sell in the way you would expect them to.
I've kept it as a hobby, and I still enjoy it incredibly all these years later. Recently, I've found an absolutely great way to enjoy my life's work in my landscape photography hobby. The Frame TV by Samsung. I already see how this is going to come across as an ad, but I think there's a couple other brands coming out with similar "art TVs", where the display is totally matte and not as bright, as to appear like a print rather than a screen. Anyway, I have hundreds of my landscape photos just roll through randomly, in 15 minute periods. It feels like every time I walk by the living room, I see a different photo. It's great to see them, as it brings back all the memories of each specific trip. The other great thing is, there's only so much wall space for photos. Instead of stressing out about which photo to print anymore, they just all get thrown into the rotation. Furthermore, it's stopped my lust for ever newer cameras with better tech. Since the TV is 4k (which is about 8mp), even the A7R2 is plenty fine resolution.
Thanks for a very frank and honest article, I think you hit the nail on the head on many. The main challenge I find is the challenge is ensuring you are constantly evolving and marketing that evolution. If we always do the same things and expect a different outcome, then we are destined for failure, I feel. I hope that you will continue your passion for photography and forget the challenges experienced, after all, we got into photography for the love of it, and not for the grind of making it a living.
Brilliant article that should be required reading for aspiring photographers thinking about jumping into the profession. Had some of the same aspirations after retiring from my main career, but after an introspective analysis on what had motivated me to go out and take photos for over 40 years, I realized that the business side of going pro held no glamour for me, and not needing the money of a second career, the “hunger” was somewhat lacking. So, realizing that I just wanted to be happy taking pictures and traveling without pressure was what I was after, I decided to stick to my amateur ways.
Really great article Michael. Thanks for sharing your experience and don't stop creating great content!
Please don’t take offense to this. Your article is sort of missing the point. The problem is right there in your cover image. I don’t see any weddings, spaces, nor commercial shots in these pictures. You were fixed on shooting what’s considered a fun category. Who wouldn’t love to gallivant around the world, taking pictures..
Product, real estate, weddings and other events. The “less than exciting and glamorous” work. Those are how many working photographers eat. If you like something as a hobby, don’t make it into a job.
This.
Yes it's a big leap to go full time, but it's got to be something marketable.
This kind of reminds of people who are "model photographers"
I can't disagree more. When you take out the things you love, then it becomes just another "job". History itself shows that art, for the sake of enjoyment, lifts people up. Where would we be without the works of people like Claude Monet, for example. There are photographers making a living doing landscape photography - I recently purchased a landscape photography book by Adam Gibbs for example - but, it does require a commitment to "marketing".
I did too.
Once I got back to photography being a recreation - I enjoyed it far more.
Cheers :)
Knowing what the public want or developing that certain style that tunes in to the current vibe has always been a challenge. It’s not about being a competent photographer who can take great photographs it’s more about developing ‘a myth’ that the public will buy into. Finding that elusive ‘added value’ that somehow differentiates and then elevates your work above the rest is the elusive holy grail. Without doubt your photography is pretty solid but as you have discovered sun rises or sun sets in exotic locations is not where it’s at.
Becoming a great photographer requires creating a persona that your photography can ride on top off. You yourself are as important as the photographs, possibly more so. When people buy your images they are in essence buying part of you.
I have no answers but what I do know having met quite a few internationally famous photographers the person and their persona are a critical element in being successful.
Hearing ‘high praise’ can be counter productive and just feed your own self delusion. Sound critique from someone that knows the market is another thing entirely. Did you ever seek out that kind of feedback?
I’m not so sure that rushing around from location to location was ever a good way of building a business as there are so many people doing that very thing with all of them being pretty competent photographers.
The same with a YouTube presence. How many photographers are out there giving this advice or that advice? They are ten a penny these days. Again it’s not about frequency it’s about creating content that stands above the rest and that’s where YOU are the most important element. Working on presentation and how you come across, designing a set, creating a style and design for your videos is crucial. Did you shoot you own video and if so what advice did you seek about how to go about it? How good a photographer you are is pretty irrelevant, for it’s all about how good YOU are.
How watchable were you? Did you ever ask for feedback for your content from a professional?
The fact that your traffic stagnated points to a problem with your content. Did you ever identify what it was?
Carving out a creative niche for yourself that stands you apart from the rest is possibly the way to go. Doing what others are doing no matter how well you do it is a hard way to go about it as you have discovered.
The last thing I’ll say is the market is king . Know the market and provide some of what it wants and deliver it in the way it wants it.