Overrated? William Eggleston: The Photographer Who Changed Everything

William Eggleston's documentation of the everyday, referred to by many as a revelation, is also regarded by others as overrated when judged in a modern context. This video by Tatiana Hopper, a respected voice on photography, dives into William Eggleston’s transformative work, leaving room for you to make up your own mind on where Eggleston's work sits in photographic history.

Born in Memphis, Tennessee, Eggleston captured the American South’s everyday scenes in new ways, embracing color photography in a time when this was snubbed as amateurish. The subjects of Eggleston's gaze paired with color film are the combination that polarized viewers of his work so much. His 1976 MoMA exhibition, William Eggleston’s Guide, displayed 75 prints of subjects like tricycles and light bulbs. Critics scorned it as “snapshot chic,” with The New York Times dubbing it the year’s “most hated show.” Eggleston’s response? “If nobody cares about your work, it could demonstrate that it does not bring anything new… but if your photos stir a strong emotional reaction… you did the job of a good photographer.” His democratic approach—treating every subject equally—reshaped photography. See how in Hopper’s video, William Eggleston: The Democratic Camera.

Hopper explains why Eggleston’s work still sparks debate. His dye-transfer printing gave images unmatched vibrancy, making color photography a fine art force. His mundane yet profound photos influenced filmmakers like David Lynch. Eggleston’s philosophy—shoot everything, no judgment—urges photographers to trust their eye and print their work. Prints, like those in The William Eggleston Guide, reveal details that screens miss.

Kim Simpson is a photographer based in the West of Scotland. Her photographic practice is an exploration of the human experience, with a particular emphasis on themes of identity and belonging.

Related Articles

5 Comments

I'm assuming the "overrated" thing is just dumb click-bait. The guy's a freakin genius.

As somebody who appreciates his photography and also lives in the Memphis area (he's considered a local hero), I do think his work overrated in the much the same way much of modern art is for cleverness over quality/execution of skill.

I agree. The "overrated" label came from descriptions of his work over the years in art circles

Those who are unable to appreciate his genius of course label him as "overrated". Having scoured over his prints in person, I can say he ranks in the pantheons of greats.