From 3 megapixels to 10 megapixels to 50 megapixels, the world of photography has changed significantly over the last 10 years. With the changes in technology, we're always in battle to keep our work and data on the most current iteration. With the rumors of the next Apple MacBook Air, it seems that the USB port is under attack, making photographers everywhere questions how they can keep their work on the most recent format.
I remember back a few years ago when the first laptop was introduced without a CD optical drive. I was in a panic, because literally all of my work was put onto a DVD, and delivered to my client through the mail or in person. What happens when I get my enviable client that doesn't have a CD drive on their computer? What hoops will I need to jump through when that time comes? In my panic, I changed my business format to accommodate for the future. I bought branded USB drives.
At the time, I thought this was the solution. Everything runs on USB these days, and with the current pricing of thumbdrives, it's nearly as affordable as blank CDs or DVDs, and far easier to work with as well. While this meant that I'd have dozens of CD cases in a closet, gathering dust and never to be used again, it also prevented me for getting the inevitable call from a client years ago, asking if there was a way I could resend them the files in a new delivery format.
Apple Making a New USB Standard
All of this news comes out of Apple introducing a new USB standard for the 2015 iteration of the MacBook Air. The MacBook Air exchanges convenience and versatility for size and form, and is looking to change the computer industry to a new standard, called USB 3 Type-C. This is not a new plug designed by Apple, but is hoping to become the new standard for computers going forward. The perks on the new format are simple - for one, it's reversible, solving the problem we've all faced, that despite logic, it somehow always takes three 180 degree rotations before the standard USB cable will fit into the input. Perhaps the biggest benefit of it comes in the bi-directional power, allowing you to charge peripheral devices, as well as the host device. Pairing that with its power output up to 100W (20V), it should also allow you to charge laptops (which are typically around 60W), allowing for a universal power cable for future laptop designs. Alongside it being reversible and versatile, it's smaller, which is a necessity when it comes to MacBook Airs and their PC ultrabook counterparts.
Everything seems great, right? However, the stark downside to this new design change comes in it not being backwards compatible. Prior iterations allowed for backwards capability. With the original USB plug design dating back to the mid 90s, everything would work with the new designs. The new designed of USB 3.0 (and USB 2.0 in the early 2000s) changed only speed of the devices, while maintaining the same shape and form, allowing for all plugs to work with the faster speeds. The new design means one of two things, we're going to need adapters, or we're going to need to buy the new devices altogether to keep up.
Adapters are a simple solution for any hard drives or other systems devices you may use, but what about your clients? If you're delivering your work on a USB thumbdrive, we're only a few years removed from that plug design being obsolete. While it's not terribly important right now, it's something to certainly think about down the line. Clients who've gotten wedding photos from you on a thumbdrive, may not be able to see their beautiful photos in five or ten years, or at least not without scouring the Chinese adapter markets on Amazon.
And while Apple is an early adopter of this technology, it's important to remember it is likely the future standard for all computers to come. The design itself is actually USB 3.1, with a standard of 10Gps - twice the speed of the current USB 3.0. And Apple isn't the only company grabbing on to the new tech. Gaming laptop manufacturer MSI has also shown its interest in the Type-C port, applying it to their latest gaming laptop systems announced at CES this year.
Alternatives
For USB thumbdrives atleast, my solution occurred a year or so ago, and I adapted to using gallery services to deliver photos to my clients. My personal preference is Pixieset, but there are dozens of gallery systems available for people, with each of them racing to acquire the photographers abandoning their USB thumbdrives, and those who still used CD/DVDs. But one must ask, will that be a solution for the future?
For one, gallery systems take a lot of personality out of the process. No longer am I meeting with clients at coffee shops, to give them their branded CD, or their elegantly boxed USB drive containing their photos. My delivery experience has been exchanged for a somewhat impersonal email of their images being ready, but with the ability to share all the photos to friends and family with ease. So while the solution fixes some past problems, it comes with a treasure trove of new ones as well.
The other likely alternative is resistance. USB 3.1 is capable of sharing the same port design of past and present USB systems, and would allow for a slower transition into the new design. By maintaining the old design of ports on computers, and pushing the new design on the backsides of peripherals first, the transition into the new tech would be a bit more organic, all while incorporating its benefits.
But who knows, maybe this new USB design won't take off. Apple's once innovative Thunderbolt system is all but dead by the hands of USB 3.0, and the new design standard proposed by Apple has already been met with plenty of opposition. That said, one value that has come from it is that it's got us thinking. How are we going to make sure our work stays around for longer than a few years? What solutions can we find for problems we're bound to have in the future?
"it also prevented me for getting the inevitable call from a client years ago, asking if there was a way I could resend them the files in a new delivery format."
Nothing is preventing you from offering *the files* in a new delivery format.
"All of this news comes out of Apple introducing a new USB standard for the 2015 iteration of the MacBook Air."
Apple is not the one introducing a new USB standard. The computing industry and relevant USB organizations are introducing this new USB standard.
"But who knows, maybe this new USB design won't take off. Apple's once innovative Thunderbolt system is all but dead by the hands of USB 3.0,"
That's not true. You are comparing Apple's to oranges. Thunderbolt, and now Thunderbolt 2, are both clearly superior to USB 3. Many people and professionals that deal with a lot of data take adavantage of Thunderbolt. The average consumer? No, but it is unlikely that Apple introduced Thunderbolt with that expectation. It serves purposes that USB 3 can not.
Thanks for the article.
We rarely burn discs occasionally use thumb drives most of our delivery system is web based. This works well for most of our clients who are companies. The biggest issue tends to be the computer and web illiterate who is usually in charge. We use the web for both video and still deliveries. Mainly because it was a fast turn around and we ended up with less wetware issues on the clients end.
As far as Apple goes we mainly use them but their are two issues we have. One is maintenance Apples used to be the most maintenance friendly system are now designed so you can't open them up and work on them. The second issue Apple in many ways is focusing on consumer products so they seem not to have resources to maintain and improve their professional products.
As far as Apple changing USB ports this not a real surprise. Apple has a long history of doing these things.
They dropped Small Computer System Interface (SCSI), serial ports and firewire ports which they developed.
From an engineering stance these were for the most part good calls but for the user it means changing sub systems also poor backwards compatibility.
With Apple you have about 75% less tech issues but when you have a hardware issue now it means shipping the computer off to get fixed, instead of replacing the part yourself.
I take it you are referring to the new iMacs in terms of getting inside them? They are actually not very difficult to get inside them. Even OEM tape kits to reseal them are available. Once the display has been removed there are also many less steps to take compared to previous iMacs. Anyone that has opened and reassembled previous Macs easily have the necessary skills to get into the new iMacs. With the new Mac Pro, all the parts are easily accessible.
The new Mac Pro, by the way, clearly shows a dedication to the professional market.
The thing you failed to consider is that most people went inside their Macs in the past to replace their hard drives. With USB 3x and Thunderbolt that is no longer necessary for storage since you could simply plug in an external drive, load your operating system, and be done with it. In the past you couldn't do that since USB 2 and Firewire were too slow to compete with an internal drive. Many Macs now also come with SSD storage so you much greater reliability, eliminating the typical need to replace the failed hard drives of the past.
As for those wanting to upgrade RAM themselves, the drive towards thin and light has led to soldered on RAM on some Macs, typically the MacBooks. For some oddball reason the new 21" iMac and the new Mac mini are included, with no customer friendly excuse for going down that route for those two Macs. Now the decision to add more RAM often needs to be made at the time of purchase, and sometimes at good expense. In terms of having to replace defective RAM that is now soldered on to the motherboard, forcing the motherboard to be replaced, I wouldn't expect there to be a significant issue with reliability. In fact, soldered in RAM is likely more reliable.
In terms of overall reliability, I would say Macs today are far more reliable than they used to be, and they were very reliable in the past. I would attribute that to SSD storage, LED LCD displays, and other more efficient components that produce far less heat than in previous Macs.
Thank Zach for the insight!
Also thanks for the link, Pixiset. Will check them out
Now you have me thinking about the future of Cameras as well. I know that we have Eyefi and wireless SD today, I wonder if memory card won't be a thing in the future.
Fstoppers, stick with covering photography news; let the big boys handle computer news. Apple is NOT involved with the development of USB 3.1 at all. Stop using sensationalized headlines and wording to otherwise give false information. Like so:
"Apple Making a New USB Standard"
"Apple introducing a new USB standard"
"the new design standard proposed by Apple"
THIS is how the big boys in news report USB 3.1 Type-C:
http://www.engadget.com/2014/08/13/usb-type-c-standard-finalized/
Also failed to mention that OEMS, like MSI is adapting the standard:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8868/msi-goes-usb-3-1-at-ces-2015-the-msi-...
Get off your Apple high horse and use a real computer.
Thank God man!! Enough with this 50/50 odd of plugging usb the wrong side, now you just plug the damn thing!!
I find this to be an exciting evolution, I have always hated standard usb connectors. Yes this will be a pain to transition into but it won't be over night. After all the computer on my desk will still have 3.0. Any ideas as to what the transfer speeds will be?
People will get over it for sure. Just like the D4/D4s with the XQD. (Not a Mac user here)
What next? Fist they got us from SCSI which worked nicely to Firewire. I still got lots of excellent, fast firewire drives. Now you need two adapters for two useless thuderbolt ports, got one USB port less and you can't set up a firewire chain .. plus no hard drives in the Macbook, so you need the ESATA or Firewire ports even more. They totally lost the plot but then I'm stuck with apple and I don't like Microsoft either.