f/138: Taking Pictures With No Lens at All

Lenses are obviously some of the most talked about pieces of photography equipment out there. However, there's one type of photography that requires no lens at all. This neat video follows a photographer as he spends a day shooting landscapes with a pinhole camera.

Using a Zero Image camera, Craig Roberts of e6 Vlogs created this fun video that follows him as he spends a day shooting pinhole images on film. Pinhole cameras are rather interesting (you might have made them with a shoebox or Pringles can as a kid), as they don't use a lens, only a small hole drilled in the front of the camera to allow light through, so small that the camera Roberts is using essentially has a 25mm f/138 lens. It's a delicate balance with pinhole cameras, as reducing the diameter of the opening reduces the size of the circle of confusion projected onto the film plane, thereby creating a sharper image, but reducing the diameter too far makes you start to bump into the wave properties of light, namely diffraction, thereby reducing sharpness. Either way, it's about as minimal a setup a photographer could possibly have, and it's a vastly different way of shooting. 

Log in or register to post comments

11 Comments

Peter Mebli's picture

Wonderfully moody images, and it seems like a fun way to spend an afternoon.

I find it strange that someone who is "going back to the basics" of photography doesn't develop the film he takes, however. He's spending all the time and effort to shoot this way, and then wet mount scanning too, why not have control over the developing process?

And if you're going to process most of your images in black and white, why not just shoot with black and white film? Meh, to each their own.

Color developing is not as easy as b/w. It's also considered considerably more toxic. Either way, I don't think it is worth developing your own color film. I used to get my color film developed for $1. I never ran into any issues.

Shooting with color film allows you the choice of having a color or b/w image.

Peter Mebli's picture

I thought so too until I starting using C-41 press kits. They're about 20 dollars (at least where I am, this man is in the UK so it may be very different), can last through a couple dozens rolls of 120, and combines the bleach and fix steps. Temperature control is key, but warming up a bucket and setting the canisters in that does the trick. Plus timing's the same regardless of film stock; you push/pull with temperature.

That being said, yes, it's definitely more toxic. I wouldn't want to guzzle the blix! Which I technically could with a b/w caffenol developer.

Personally, I shoot differently depending on if I'm composing for b/w or color (I focus more on form and contrast in b/w) but to each their own.

Anonymous's picture

Want.
Somebody knows if loading and unloading a film into those is similar to a normal film camera (say 35mm)?
AT

I don't see why it would be any different. The general mechanism for loading, holding and advancing such film is not complicated.

We made pinhole cameras in grade school. I wasn't yet interested in photography so I really don't remember much about it, but the fact that we did makes me wonder if kids in school today are exposed to such technical things. We had so many vocational classes and shops back then.

Peter Mebli's picture

We made a camera obscura for the recent solar eclipse. Big enough to put your whole head in. Students loved it, and it's still sitting in my office.

Michael Holst's picture

When I was in high school (little over a decade ago) we turned an entire room into a camera obscura to demonstrate how it works. It was one of the first mind blowing moments I've had in education and made me fall in love with photography in that moment. I'm pretty sure these things still happen. The high school I went to still has a black and white film photography course where students shoot, develop, and work in a dark room to create a set of images. I miss that class.

"When I was in high school (little over a decade ago)"

Good Lord. I thought you were much older than that.

"we turned an entire room into a camera obscura to demonstrate how it works."

Yep, I've heard of the room one too. It just got me thinking if such fascinating things, at least for us kids at the time, are done in schools today. In science classes the teacher even blew up hydrogen and sodium.

"The high school I went to still has a black and white film photography course where students shoot, develop, and work in a dark room to create a set of images. I miss that class."

That's good to hear. While I no longer have an interest in film there is still great value and pleasure in printing your own traditional photos. It was my favorite part of film photography. I used a Saunders d6700 color enlarger and super sharp Fujinon lenses for 35mm and medium format. The paper was developed entirely in light tight Cibachrome development tubes on a rotary motorized base due to lack of space for traditional trays. Cut down greatly on the fumes too.

Michael Holst's picture

For a high school class it was definitely a challenging curriculum. To get credit we were required to shoot a few different types of photographs like a portrait, landscape, night photographs, and we also had to show that we're able to shoot shallow and wide depth of field. Develop the film by hand, and create enlargement prints in the darkroom. If you get something wrong while shooting you don't find out until you develop the film so it took a lot of attention to detail to get a good grade. We also got extra credit if we could show that we know how to dodge and burn in the darkroom. A learned skill I didn't appreciate until later when I see new photographers complaining about how difficult it is to edit without presets. We had a great teacher who was as much encouraging as he was critical. I miss that class!

Dodging and burning, and creating the homemade tools for it, was fun. I remember being surprised at how well everything blended in on my first attempt.

"I miss that class!"

As you get older you'll be using the miss word a lot. Maybe you already do. I miss a lot of what used to be. I loved the 70s, and that's coming from someone that used to quickly dismiss older people's nostalgia. I still won't go to retirement lunches though. It can get pretty pathetic in numbers.