Digital film simulations have become a popular way to capture the look of classic film stocks without the hassle of processing and scanning. They’re practical for anyone who wants a specific aesthetic without spending time on extensive post-processing, and they give you the freedom to focus on composition and light.
Coming to you from Reggie Ballesteros, this practical video breaks down how film simulations work and why they’re useful in digital photography. Ballesteros explains that while film simulations can’t replicate film’s organic look precisely, they get remarkably close. Unlike shooting on actual film, digital simulations let you adjust settings like ISO on the fly and adapt to various lighting conditions. Traditional film stocks often require specific lighting to achieve their intended look. With film simulations, however, you’re free from these constraints. This flexibility is a huge advantage for those who want the aesthetic of film but with the adaptability of digital.
Ballesteros also emphasizes the efficiency film simulations bring to a photographer’s workflow. Unlike raw files, which require significant editing and rendering power, JPEGs created with film simulations are essentially ready-to-use. This is particularly valuable for photographers who want to spend less time editing and more time shooting or sharing their work. Ballesteros recalls his time in wedding photography, dealing with thousands of raw files per shoot. Processing these large files became tedious, prompting him to switch to a JPEG workflow. With film simulations, he can achieve his desired look right out of the camera, cutting down the editing time drastically.
Another advantage Ballesteros mentions is the cost-effectiveness of using film simulations. Film photography requires purchasing rolls of film and paying for development and scanning—or investing in equipment to do it yourself. These expenses add up, especially for those shooting frequently. Digital simulations offer a similar aesthetic without these recurring costs, making it a budget-friendly alternative. For photographers on a budget, or those with family and other financial responsibilities, film simulations provide a way to capture the nostalgic look of film without straining the budget.
Film simulations also offer a level of creative constraint that can be liberating. Ballesteros shares that the limitations of JPEGs push him to think carefully about composition, exposure, and lighting rather than relying on extensive post-processing. JPEGs offer less flexibility than raw files, so there’s only so much adjusting you can do after the fact. This constraint encourages a more intentional approach to each shot, helping you refine your style and focus on what’s in front of the lens, not unlike film. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Ballesteros.
