• 0
  • 0
Ken Hilts's picture

Using a sub-optimal lens and inexpensive tracker

Kancamagus Illuminati - The stars sing their secrets
Location: Along the Kancamagus Highway in New Hampshire, USA.

I don't own any great lens choices for astrophotography. The two least bad options in my kit are a 16-35mm f/4 zoom and a 50mm f/1.8 prime (both Nikon). I decided to go with the 50mm stopped down to f/2.8. Also purchased an inexpensive (Nyx Tracker) motorized barn door mount to try tracking for the first time.

This image was composited using two sets of pano-stitched images at the same tripod location; one set was taken at about 8pm to capture the setting sun on the ridgeline, and the second set was taken at about 10:30pm when the sky was dark enough to capture the starfield.

Settings: 50mm · f/2.8 · 30 sec · ISO 1600

I'd love to learn and get better... any comments are welcome, thanks!

Log in or register to post comments


Francisco B's picture

Nice shot. Ken, the 50 1.8 from nikon is very sharp, and even though its not a low light performer, it gets the job done on a tripod. Don't let the cheap price tag fool you :)

1600 iso seems pretty high for that shot on a tripod, particularly since ur lens is almost wide open. was it pitch dark outside?

Ken Hilts's picture

Thanks! It was pitch dark - I was getting about 1/4 up from black on the histogram and didn't want to shift that any darker by reducing the ISO. Since it was the first time using the Nyx tracker, I thought I'd start with 30 seconds; I can try doubling the exposure time and halving the ISO next time.

Deleted Account's picture

I like the sky colors you got in post-edit.

I use a Pentax K-3 II. It has an on- board "astrotracking" program... allows for up to 5 minutes open time without trails, allegedly. Saves me going deeper in debt for tracking mounts. I found a decent Rokinon 10mm, f/2.8 lens I use for astrophotography.

Not tried any stitching of shots. But I second Francisco on saying... you can still do a lot with a nifty fifty in the dark.