Vogue and Annie Leibovitz Under Criticism for Badly Lit Photos of Gymnast Simone Biles, Raising Another Discussion About Lack of Diversity

Vogue and Annie Leibovitz Under Criticism for Badly Lit Photos of Gymnast Simone Biles, Raising Another Discussion About Lack of Diversity

Vogue Magazine has faced criticism over its recent August cover portraying American gymnast Simone Biles, which was shot by Annie Leibovitz, with the public calling for more diversity behind the scenes to better portray dark skin tones.

Only just recently, Vogue Portugal received backlash for its latest issue, self-dubbed as "The Madness Issue," which the public described as being "poor taste" and for undermining the complexity of conversations around mental health. Similarly, the August issue of Vogue, which features America's most decorated gymnast, Simone Biles, has been criticized for failing to capture dark skin tones in a flattering way. Although the negativity primarily surrounds the lighting and post-processing of the shots, others have expressed disdain for how the gymnast was styled, too. 

Some have defended Leibovitz by pointing out that her style of shooting depicts subjects in a "painterly" way; however, public opinion has been predominantly negative. The photographs of Biles are dimly lit, almost letting the gymnast blend in with the background instead of highlighting her features and personality. Some Twitter users took this opportunity to share work shot by less publicly known photographers, even Gabrielle Union's daughter, Zaya Wade, aged 13, whose photographic captures of dark skin tones showcase the subject as radiant and flattering — a complete opposite to the shots by Leibovitz.

https://twitter.com/allisonhopstad/status/1281616493851971585?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1281713773179334656%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffpost.com%2Fentry%2Fsimone-biles-vogue-black-photographers_n_5f09613ac5b6480493d05283

This has raised concern for the lack of diversity, calling for more black photographers or photographers who understand how to light and edit darker skin tones and could have been hired by Vogue instead. Understandably so, the process from the initial concept to the final image involves several steps along the way and thus, people, which means that a better understanding of darker skin tones is not only required at the shooting stage but also during the initial styling and the final post-processing stage.

Interestingly, just last month, Today reported that Anna Wintour, Vogue editor-in-chief, had assured staff in a letter promising that the magazine will work towards diversity when featuring black models and photographers, which is something that could have been put into practice for the August issue. In an email obtained by Today, Wintour recognized the injustices and hurt experienced by "the black members" of the Vogue team and noted that "doing something about it is overdue."

However, using diversity as a marketing trick or as a buzzword during tumultuous times when race issues become more prevalent than before is paying lip service to real and genuine change and activism. Recently, we have seen Magnum and Nikon take a good look at their practices and inclusivity, but at times, it may be hard to distinguish real concern for changes needed towards a more inclusive industry and what could be seen by some as the small effort just to regain quick public approval and to be seen as doing the "right" thing. 

While Wintour's letter circulated among the staff, black photographers and designers took to social media to show what diversity would look like in practice. Using hashtag #VogueChallenge, which originated from Salma Noor, a model based in Oslo, Norway, these artists mocked up Vogue covers that featured Black models. Always having wished to see a representation of people that look like her, Noor was inspired to create a mock-up cover and kickstart this visual challenge, where other photographers and designers joined in.

Some of the participants of #VogueChallenge admitted that Wintour's apology is encouraging, but until real action and change take place, it may remain just a trend that companies and representatives follow to remain seen as part of the positive shift. As Noor concludes, this still gives hope to artists and creators like herself and others who are given a confirmation that regardless of their skin color, they can still be a part of the same platform as everyone else. Equally, the same notion applies across other parts of the industry, whether it is an agency, a magazine, a collective, or a camera brand. 

It might be too early to tell which organizations and companies have implemented or are working towards genuine inclusivity and which are doing the bare minimum for the sake of marketing and trends. What are your thoughts on Leibovitz's August Vogue photographs and Wintour's apology?

Lead image by EVG photos used under Creative Commons. 

Anete Lusina's picture

Anete Lusina is a photographer based in West Yorkshire, UK. You'll either find her shooting weddings, documentary, or street photography across the U.K. and Europe, or perhaps doing the occasional conceptual shoot.

Log in or register to post comments
68 Comments
Previous comments

I agree ... though the badly lit argument falls apart the moment you look at it artistically...

That's what I was thinking too. To me it seems Annie was just going for a darker vibe.

And so the whole bigotry actually falls on those who claim that Annie doesn’t know how to shoot a black women. And there’s plenty out there making just that claim...

The author of this post, Anete Lusina, gets dangerously close by convoluting the notion that Annie’s photograph is badly lit for a black person with the supposed racism at The Vogue ( for hiring a white photographer?).

I’m asking myself who is the racist here?

Anete or The Vogue / Annie Leibovitz

Absolutely. The people looking for racism end up being racist themselves. So much irony. I mean seriously. Annie Leibovitz has been in this industry for decades. If she was actually a racist we would have known by now. She has created numerous works of art that include People of Color but for some reason THIS is what makes her racists? Really?

The capture on the right could have been a little lighter as far as i can see But over all Annie's style is on point for this Vogue cover. Big fan of Both Ann and Vogue : ) Here's a shocker i'm black👍

This comment section is hilarious! Since most all of us get paid to do this (trigger warning - I’m black!) let’s just agree that the post processing on the image is kinda garbage, and that there’s probably enough data in the shadows of that raw file to light Simone up like Casper if you wanted! Lol. Also, white or black, many of us have under exposed a shoot on purpose to give us room to edit - especially when the frame includes bright AF elements like that crazy metal dress. I struggle with anyone assuming AL can’t light black people, because I have a beautiful (and expensive!) book of her work showing she’s pretty darn good at it. And I strongly doubt she was sitting up late night stressing in Lightroom doing the final processing on this. That probably landed in someone else’s lap. The one thing I do worry some of you might be missing on both sides of this argument is the need for black people in the overall chain of production. I don’t need every black person in a magazine to be shot by Tyler Mitchell and it would be racist to suggest so - full stop. BUT... the diversity issue I see with this image is that it somehow went through a long chain of people - photographer, assistants, editors, publishers, etc. and still landed in the magazine looking pretty lame — I do think if there were more diverse voices in that chain - at all levels - we wouldn’t be having this conversation cause someone would have caught it and not let our national treasure Simone end up looking like a sad emo fly in milk. Just saying.

As a side note though, I’m impressed so many people used this comments section to espouse their real feelings about the social unrest right now, and skipped the opportunity to have a debate about the technical integrity of this image. I see more references to snowflakes, segregation, and reflexive support for AL than any single element of the exposure triangle. Maybe it’s how the article itself is framed but Cmon were better than this.

Is it poorly lit or was she trying to preserve the highlights in the gems on the dress and the editor didn't compensate? Maybe Vogue picked that out of many they had to choose from on purpose? I don't see how this goes from being "an under exposed photo" to "she's a racist because she didn't photograph a black person correctly." This stuff has to stop.

Listening to people whine about other people whining tends to give me ga............? .......er?..,,,,,.ah?........heartburn!

What a butthead... it's called fashion... if she likes it fine, if she doesn't nobody really cares about her opinion.

I'll like to take a moment to say Canon camera's are the best on the planet ......Thank you so much PEACE

Which planet?? ;-)

LOL ; )

That's a strange way of spelling Fuji haha xD.

Nice LOL it's all good Scoops .

We just gonna pretend Annie is doing her own lighting or art direction or retouching lmfao.. Photography is all about team work and i am sure theres some diversity on her team because I know some of her assistants.

Photography doesn't always have to be "pretty". It doesn't always have to be "nice". AL knows how to light skin and knows how to light African American skin. Her choices were artistic ones intended to highlight certain aspects of SB.

I just think they were really bad choices that turned a 23 year vibrant young woman into looking like she's a 47 year old smoker and did nothing to get to the essence of who SB is. AL chose her own style over a genuine capture and she made the wrong choice

Stifling freedom of expression. That's all it is. Reminds me of the old Soviet Union.

stifling: "making one feel constrained or oppressed."