I Switched to Fuji 18 Months Ago and Haven’t Looked Back

I Switched to Fuji 18 Months Ago and Haven’t Looked Back

I’m not a trend-setter. I’m 31, pudgy, married, and writing this from my modest ranch hidden among 5000 other modest ranches in a suburb about 90 minutes outside of New York City. I shop at Big Y, buy my clothes at Khol’s, and look forward to Sunday Night Football every Fall. I’m also not really a trend-follower. Ultimately, I spend my time under-the-radar, paying my taxes, and mulching my lawn. Which makes my switch from Nikon to Fuji pretty remarkable. 

My current Fuji wedding kit. (lighting not shown)

“I Been a Long Time Leavin’...”

I started with Nikon in 2004 when I took a job shooting as a freelance photojournalist for a local newspaper in my home state. I was a Canon shooter, until my editor gave me the code to access the lens closet at the paper. There stood before me an entire utility closet of Nikon glass. Nearly a hundred lenses, and I could use any one I wanted… provided I had a Nikon body. I sold my Canon and bought a Nikon D100 the very next day.

I didn’t put much more thought into switching, and I stayed with Nikon for another decade. When I started shooting weddings I added a D80 into my bag, and off I went. Here’s a list of the Nikon bodies I’ve owned and worked with over the years (not necessarily in order):

  • D100
  • D200
  • D40x
  • D80
  • D300
  • D300s           
  • D3
  • D3s
  • D4
  • D4s 
  • D700
  • D750 
  • D800
  • D810

I’ve put about 1.4 million clicks of the shutter through my various Nikon bodies over the years, and I’ve owned all the glass you could imagine to go with them. I know the Nikon system inside and out.


"...But I'll Be a Long Time Gone."

I didn’t leave Nikon for Fuji because Nikon had suddenly started making poor-quality products. Except for the notorious banding issue on the 750 (which I was lucky enough to experience twice, on two different bodies at the same wedding), I never really had a problem with my Nikon gear. The lens lineup was great, I had a collection of Sb-910 flashes that I still love to this day, and Nikon cameras just seemed to work.

Then one day a friend of mine brought over his Fuji Xpro-1. What was this small, strange looking, Leica-esque camera he just placed in my hands? I borrowed it for a couple of days and I fell in love. It was weird and new, as clunky as it was nostalgic, and it threw me right back to the days of firing off Portra 160 when I was a kid. I wanted in.

If you know me personally, you know that once I decide that I’m doing something, I do it at 150% until it’s done. I did the same thing with switching from DSLR to mirrorless. Within four months of picking up my first Fuji I owned an entire system, backups included, and switched to shooting my weddings with my new kit full time. 

iPhone photo of the vendor table at my last wedding.

It’s Not Just About Specs

There are lots of tangible, calculable reasons why switching to mirrorless makes sense for a wedding shooter. The weight and size of the gear notwithstanding, the image quality, colors, and ability of these cameras and lenses to focus wide open is outstanding. There are also lots of reasons to not switch. The lack of a solid, well-integrated flash and lighting system being the big one. However, I switched because it changed the way I feel about photography.

Something about this kit, some indefinable quality that can’t be measured or described has reinvigorated me as a creative professional. It’s put the spark back in my work that I haven’t felt in years. I shoot a lot of weddings… probably more in a year than most do in three or four. So if you want to tell me I was burning myself out I probably can’t argue too much. This Fuji system has changed everything for me.

The first wedding I shot on a Fuji I found myself caring more about my composition than ever before. It slowed me down. I went from shooting an average of 3500 images per wedding to about 1200. I was more in tune with the pace of the day, and I felt seamlessly intertwined with the cadence of each wedding than I had ever felt before. 

I also shed all of my gear. No more big bags, no more lens belts, or duel-shouldered straps. I’ve actually never owned a lens longer than an 85, but the idea of dropping all that bulky, clunky equipment is what did it for me. I finally felt like I could get the images I envisioned. Why did it take a switch to mirrorless for this to happen? 

I have no idea.

What is an Artist?

Someone in the Fstoppers boards once told me they likened the use of the word “artist” as a descriptor of oneself to using the word “master.” I decided to start referring to myself as a creative professional instead. The Fuji system has pushed me closer to truly being the artist that I want to be than any other change or integration to my workflow. 

“The best thing about a picture is that it never changes, even when the people in it do.” - Andy Warhol

We are tasked, as photographers, with this enormous challenge of capturing the subjects we shoot as they truly are. We have to create a timeless and honest representation of that moment that will withstand time, life, and death. For me, the switch to mirrorless helped me reunite with the passion I started with when I shot my first wedding nearly 300 weddings ago.

I remember that feeling, when I opened the lens closet at the struggling newspaper. Beat up and blemished lenses that, if they themselves could talk, would pen a million different stories told by all the photographers who had come and gone before me. I was like a kid in a candy store. There was no assignment I couldn't tackle with this kind of equipment. For the first time in my young career I really believed I could do this.

I felt that same rush of excitement and determination the first time I picked up that Fuji. That’s why I switched, and that’s why I have never looked back.

Markus G's picture

Eric is a wedding photographer, mirrorless shooter, and armchair economist based in the United States. He combines his love for photography with his background in predictive analytics to run two busy and successful wedding photography studios.

Log in or register to post comments
71 Comments
Previous comments

Either he's not American, or somehow he missed a very common style of home more common to the part of the country he indicates he is from. 😁

...or he was joking. :-)

I left that option out purposely to see the kind of response I would get from him. 😁

I want to buy a Fujifilm camera, but not until they stop using that X-Trans sensor. Images are simply too soft as a result.

I hear this a lot, but not entirely sure where the argument comes from. I've had no issues with sharpness when editing Fuji's RAW files in LR. With no AA filter, the files from the X-Trans have great detail. I made a video showing some of my shots in LR. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyGFNWvzfG0

Check the review sites, particularly the one that starts with dp...... and compare the camera review image quality tests. All the Fujifilm X cameras have the same softness to their images. The softness is a result of the unique sensor design. If you are ok with the images, great. Unfortunately I always see the softness in Fujifilm X camera images. I like to print large and that makes it even worse.

To each their own I guess. I think the issue that I hear isn't necessarily that the X-Trans sensor isn't sharp, but that the software used to process the X-Trans Raw files (be it LR or otherwise) has a hard time with it. I've also heard a lot of people say that when processing the Raw files with Fujis' own Silkypix, it's a big difference. That may be true, but all I know is that I haven't been able to tell a difference in LR. I shot with both Canon and Nikon full frame systems before I switched to Fuji and I personally haven't noticed a difference. I would say that if you were interested in buying a Fujifilm camera, rent your model of choice and give it a try using LR. You may be surprised.

I've tried LR and all the other recommended RAW converters that are supposed to work better and the two issues I have with the X-Trans sensor remains. From everything I have read the problem lies in the sensor design itself. What makes it capable of reducing color moire so much is what causes the two other problems, soft images and odd patterns/artifacts in certain scenes.

Fair enough. Bayer sensors today have gotten to the point where they work much better without an AA filter than they used to which could make the point of having the X-Trans irrelevant. If you really want a Fuji with a Bayer sensor, might as well go for the GFX. :)

If you want to buy one for me, I'll take it.

Haha! Yeah, I don't think I'll be using one anytime soon.

😁

I literally only buy things that make me look sexy.

I shoot a metric ton of classical music and have never had a problem with my Canons noise-wise, though I do pay careful attention in knowing when to click and when not.

Crappy image quality at high ISO may be an extreme statement. I've been shooting with the X-T1 for a year now and I find the ISO performance to be pretty solid. It's no Nikon D5 or anything, but files are definitely usable at ISO 3200 and 6400.

The biggest drawback with Fuji is the batteries I don't know how you can shoot weddings without two to three bodies and at least 10 batteries. Even with 10 batteries one must still have several backup batteries because the batteries themselves are not reliable for constant use and recharges. I don't shoot jpeg but the Fuji line produces the best quality jpegs I seen yet. My Fujis also all have one common other deal breaker which Fuji has generously included for free the dials move easily ....brushing against my side, in and out of the bag. And even it seems by themselfs sometime.

Yeah the batteries are the biggest drawback in my opinion as well. I now carry on regular 3 fully charged batteries at all times. I'm not in the wedding game but on long exposure shots that I take, I can feel the camera sucking the juice out of the batteries.

I've shot 5 weddings using two X-T1's and really haven't had a problem with battery life. Between the 2 cameras, I typically use 2.5 batteries for a whole day of shooting. I have 5 batteries total. It's all about how you use it. When not in use, I turn them off. I hardly ever review pictures as the EVF shows me my exposure so there's no need to chimp.

I love fuji but Im not a fan of the lacking high iso capabilities on my xt1. Im heard the xt2 is better but not by much.

I'm so very close to doing the switch right now... I currently use a Nikon D810 kit for weddings and fashion work and I've become very comfortable with the system. I have no issues with the image quality or abilities of the Nikon. I have no want to get the D850. But dang my body hurts at the end of the weekend from hauling all that around. I never thought of switching back to Fuji (I sold my XT1 kit last year), but now with the Profoto TTL trigger coming out I'm waffling every day about taking my kit down to the store and doing a trade. I'm told if I bring it all in today I could walk out with an XT2, Grip, the two 2.8 zooms, a flash, and the 56mm f1.2 with no money out of pocket.