Canon cameras tend to get a lot of flak for seemingly being behind the times technologically speaking, though they remain the top brand in the world. Nonetheless, it's not all bad with them. Here are three things that I think Canon cameras do very well.
When I was a kid, I shot with Canon film cameras, though I didn't know much about photography; I just liked taking pictures. I continued shooting with them as I moved into the digital world, but being the nerd I am, I eventually branched out. I've shot with Pentax, Panasonic, Sony, Fujifilm, and Hasselblad, and I currently shoot mainly with a Sony a7R III and a Canon 1D X Mark II. In all that experimentation, I've come to appreciate certain things about Canon cameras that might get overlooked when one looks at the spec sheets and the like.
Ergonomics
There is really no codified way to quantify this, and thus, it often gets swept under the rug by more marquee features like frame rates and dynamic range. But taking pictures is a physical act, and as such, how a camera fits in your hands has a significant impact on how comfortable you are and can even affect if you get a shot or not, as having a strong, intuitive feel for the device's operation can shave off precious milliseconds that make the difference between getting the shot and being just a smidgen late.
In this regard, I think Canon can't be beaten. In the race to shrink the size of bodies in the last few years, I think ergonomics have suffered a bit. I love the files I get out of my Sony, but holding it for extended periods of time can get a bit uncomfortable, and it never feels deeply molded to my hands so much as simply being gripped. On the other hand, my Canon feels like an extension of my body. Whereas most camera bodies have grips that simply aren't big enough, causing me to hold them more with my fingertips, the Canon's grip allows the entirety of my fingers to wrap around it, sinking deep into my palm. The textured material adds the right amount of friction to keep it in place. Whereas other cameras feel acceptable in my hands, a Canon camera legitimately feels comfortable; it's an enjoyable physical sensation to pick one up. And over the course of several hours of shooting, that seemingly minor distinction can add up to a big difference.
This is further backed up by the controls layout. I personally think Canon does a great job with the physical placement and feel of controls. I can keep my eye to the viewfinder and change all of the most crucial settings with ease and efficiency, which is again a very important aspect of staying agile while shooting. This is why I always say that if I could drop a Sony sensor into a Canon body, I'd have my perfect camera.
Menu System
I used to scoff at complaints about menu systems on cameras, thinking photographers were being overdramatic. But I've come to appreciate how much a logical, well laid out, and well labeled menu system is. We've all had that experience on a shoot where the camera isn't behaving the way we expect, and we have to try to quickly diagnose and fix it before we start missing shots. Canon's menus are very well organized in an intuitive fashion such that even if you don't know where a feature or setting is, you can quickly guess and find it.
Even more importantly, feature and setting labels are well named and clearly indicate exactly what they're affecting. There are many other camera systems on which the names given to menu settings are too technical, nebulous, or just plain weird to tell you what they're actually affecting, and that can be tremendously frustrating. You shouldn't have to keep the manual in your camera bag or refer to Google for these things. Also, I often find the organization and location of settings on other cameras to be less well thought through. But perhaps most frustratingly, I've found that sometimes, changing settings on another camera results in unanticipated consequences on other settings or features. With a Canon camera, you can intuitively follow the camera's internal structure and logic with ease.
Lens Selection
Other companies are definitely catching up, but Canon remains the brand with the deepest library of professional and more esoteric lenses. And while most brands have the standard sets of professional lenses now (the holy trinity of f/2.8 zooms, standard primes, etc.), Canon has some of the most interesting lenses that can give you a competitive edge in specialized applications or that can inspire creativity. For example, they have a highly regarded line of tilt-shift lenses ranging from 17mm to 135mm, with the longer focal lengths featuring macro capabilities. Their 28-70mm f/2L is a stunner that blurs the line between prime and zoom in terms of capabilities.
Whatever (possibly justified) complaints photographers have about a lack of innovation in camera bodies, Canon certainly creates a veritable bevy of reliable, high quality, innovative lenses, and anyone working with the Canon system is certainly not left wanting when it comes to glass. Even as I continue to migrate away from Canon bodies, I find myself hanging on to a few of my favorite lenses and using adapters simply because the results I get from them are so consistently excellent. If you're a photographer who relies on more standard lenses, that might not matter as much to you nowadays, but if you need more specialized glass, Canon is still one of the leaders.
Conclusion
Canon tends to get a lot of criticism for a seemingly glacial pace of evolution, and some of that criticism is certainly justified. Nonetheless, behind the headline features that attract the attention of photographers, there are a lot of subtle aspects and features of the Canon system that add up to what's quite often a very enjoyable and reliable shooting experience.
What are your favorite features of the Canon system? Let me know in the comments!
Ask a rock climber if they’d rather hang on a crimp or a jug for 4 hours. It’s not uncommon for “bulk” to add effectiveness. I guess if you have very small hands, I would give you the benefit of the doubt, or if you had no pinky on your right hand.
Over the last 12 years, our studio has gone from Nikon, to Canon, to Canon and Panasonic, then added in a few Sony bodies. Now we’re rock Canon and Sony. Here’s our thoughts (which are not meant to stomp on yours).
In all 3 categories, our entire studio prefers Canon. They’re just a pleasure to use. Menu system might be subjective, but ergonomics and lens selection are are hard to argue with.
Image quality probably goes to Sony or Nikon. They come quite close subjectively.
Color goes to Canon, but obviously that’s subjective (but also widely recognized and accepted)
Features easily goes to Panasonic or Sony. That ones not so subjective.
After going from Canon to 90% Sony whenever I use the 5d2 I need to dial back the warm and saturated Canon color science to a more neutral to match the Sony color science....
But since I very rarely use the colors that the camera picks for me, that is what Joey from "Friends" calls a "moo point"
I like one more thing about Canon - they have the best service in my experience - compared to Nikon, Sony and Fujifilm. The cost of repair for Fuji being the highest and slowest in response times.
My experience with the Pro Support was:
NPS usually answered "your fault, impact damage. it will cost $XXX -$20% Updated firmware cleaned sensor"
CPS usually answered "could not recreate the issue, it will cost $XXX -$20% updated firmware and cleaned sensor"
SPS usually answered "yes it is broken, it will cost $XXX -$20% to fix but may take 3 days to 3 weeks, updated firmware and cleaned sensor"
To be fair all usually had a loaner on hand so It was not a huge deal. And I always had to re-clean the sensor LoL
Canon fits my hands, I love the control layout. I'll never change.
"This is further backed up by the controls layout. I personally think Canon does a great job with the physical placement and feel of controls. I can keep my eye to the viewfinder and change all of the most crucial settings with ease and efficiency, which is again a very important aspect of staying agile while shooting. This is why I always say that if I could drop a Sony sensor into a Canon body, I'd have my perfect camera."
I can't say I have ever completely agreed with a paragraph as much as I agree with this one. And props to Canon for essentially never changing the perfect layout they have. I can get a new SLR from them and be up and running in 15 minutes after I set my menu shortcuts.
More world class images are done on a Canon than any other camera, despite spec sheets. I'm pretty okay with my upper limit being "world class".
Do I wish there was more dynamic range, IBIS, and 120fps @ 1080 on my EOS R? Of course! But those aren't the only things that make a camera good (unless you spend more time posting on DPR forums than taking photos).
Why get butthurt if they talk about a camera brand you don't like. If this were an automotive website the same would be argued between Ford, Chevy, and Dodge. If you like it and it does the job, congrats! I've read so many articles that state, "the best camera is the one that is with you!", seems to me that brand doesn't matter then. Keep shooting and trying to improve and most importantly is have fun! Thanks for the article.
Just bought the 90D and i use a 70D for back up....I have wicked glass from Sigma Tamron and Canon . Why change?
I just have to agree with everything you have said in this article, I use a mid range Canon Dslr (aswell as 35mm bodies), holding my Canon Dslr is an almost invisible experience, button layout near perfect and menu system, may not be the prettiest, but functionally is the best.
Even my older 35mm bodies, EOS 50e, 500, 300v are ergonomically near perfect, Canon carried over much of their Dslr body design from these 35mm ubiquitous models. Models, I might add, still in use today. The only other brand I would consider buying, yes, everyone's favourite, Pentax. Thanks.