Which Camera Manufacturer Has the Best Menu System?

Which Camera Manufacturer Has the Best Menu System?

Well, let’s open this huge can of worms and see what happens.

Over the last few years, Sony has done something incredible. They managed to make people care about the most boring thing in a camera: the menu. The first few mirrorless cameras that Sony produced were terrible. I hated so much about them that the menu was too far down the list for it to ever be anything I discussed.

Since then of course, Sony has made some huge changes and updates to almost all its cameras. The current mirrorless cameras from Sony are so good, that we now argue about the minutest, tweezer plucking points ever.

Does it Matter?

Yes, it does. Although I am poking fun at this discussion, I do think it’s important for camera manufacturers to offer a well-designed user interface. Cameras with a bad menu system, or a convoluted interface, end up frustrating people away. This is something that Sony has been working hard on and in my view, its cameras have come a long way. The abundance of custom buttons make for a pleasing overall experience.

For a long time, cameras only had the ability to take pictures. Designing an interface for that was pretty straight forward. Now, we have cameras that require multiple settings for just the viewfinders, let alone anything else. Due to this, menus from most camera manufacturers have become bloated and difficult to manage.

It’s more important now for manufacturers to figure out a simple and easy to use interface. Cameras now, offer a great number of features and I have a feeling this number is yet to increase. It’s not enough to simply add another page in the menu, a complete overhaul is probably required in order to keep things manageable.

What Do I Think?

I’ve now shot with most of the current major manufacturers on the market. Based on my experience, I have drawn a few conclusions on what I think is the best menu system.

1. Hasselblad

In 2015, Hasselblad hired Perry Oosting as its CEO. Oosting was previously the CEO of a cell phone company called Vertu and this I think, has had the biggest influence on current generation Hasselblad cameras.

The menu systems used in Hasseblad cameras are without a doubt the best on the market. There is a familiarity to it because it’s been influenced by smartphone operating systems. The whole menu has been optimized for touch screen use, making it incredibly easy to understand. Simple swipe gestures allow you to move from one section to another. Couple that with the dials and buttons that Hasselblad cameras have, and you have the best menu system on the market.

Nothing else comes close.  

2. Canon

Almost anyone who has shot with a Canon camera, probably agrees that Canon have a very intuitive and easy to use menu system. Everything seems logical and easy to understand. The easy to use menu system is one of the reasons, I still prefer to shoot with Canon for any meaningful projects.

Canon is one of the few manufacturers that offers a proper and fully useable touch screen. Most other manufacturers only allow you to use the touch screen for swiping through images or selecting AF points. Although this is useful, it’s frustrating to have a limited touch screen.

I can comfortably say, Canon has the best menu system from any full frame camera on the market.

3. Pentax

Pentax is about as good as Canon except that it lacks a touch screen. I loved shooting with Pentax cameras because I got the impression, they were designed by people who clearly understood what photographers need. My experience is limited mostly to the Pentax 645z and I loved shooting with it.

It’s the little things that really caught my attention. For example, the camera screen will flash if you leave the lens cap on. Yes, I’ve left the lens cap on a fair few times. This is more to do with the camera warning you about exposure, as opposed to it being about the lens cap, but still, very useful.

Everything about the camera, like the buttons and the fact that it had two tripod mounts, just made me enjoy shooting with it.

4. Sony

Sony is somewhat of a mixed bag. The a7 series of cameras started off with having the worst menu and user interface. Since then, Sony has worked hard to improve the overall experience. The menu system remains relatively unchanged; however, Sony has added a whole bunch of customizable buttons. It’s these buttons that have made the overall experience significantly better. I almost never need to go into the menu, because the custom buttons offer me almost every feature I need, for most shoots.  
Also, the favorites menu is extremely helpful for quick access to my most used features.

If Sony can improve its actual menu and offer a proper touch screen, it could potentially take Canons spot.

5. Leica

When it comes to Leica, it seems to depend on the camera you shoot with. I would rate the M series of cameras much higher than Sony; but then, those cameras are far simpler with far fewer features. 

Cameras like the SL2, however, tend to be a little frustrating to use. It’s not the menu because the menu in the SL2 is fantastic and incredibly easy to use. The problem is the lack of buttons on the camera body, which in my view, detracts from the overall experience.

The camera doesn’t have a front dial which is something I always miss. Although the SL2 does have a top dial, it’s less than comfortable to use. The camera also doesn't have a D-pad, which does make quick access to features a bit of a pain. The minimal design looks beautiful but, from a practical standpoint it can be a little slower and less effective to shoot with. A fully useable touch screen would go a long way with the SL2.

6. Phase One

The menu system in Phase One cameras are about as good as Hasselblad, potentially even better. They both offer similar swipe gestures and a fully useable touch screen. The menu has also been optimized for touch and I absolutely love it. You may be wondering why I’ve ranked this camera so low then. Well, there are a few issues that I experience with Phase One that pushes it down the ranks for me.

Phase One tends to over complicate its menu system. There are settings within settings, within settings. I prefer something a little straight forward. I can appreciate that some people would describe this as a benefit, and I wouldn’t disagree with them either. I just personally prefer a simpler design. Also, the time it takes for Phase One backs to load images in the playback screen is ridiculous. I appreciate the files are huge, but a Hasselblad camera with the same sensor has never had a problem.

Finally, the number of crashes and shutdowns I have to go through just to use the camera, is too much for me. Admittedly, this is mostly because I shoot with a technical camera, so it’s an unfair point against Phase One. The technical camera is essentially a huge adapter. I appreciate the back would work better on a Phase One camera, but this is based on my experience and what I think.

7. Fujifilm

I hate Fujifilm’s menu system. Fuji's menu system is kind of like Argos here in the UK. Every retailer decided on one way of running a shop and Argos thought, no, we want to be different.

I hate the fact that Fuji made Auto ISO more complicated than it needs to be. I also hate using top dials because you can’t use them while holding the camera with both hands, ready to take a shot. The top dials are a terrible idea; I mean sure they look great but, there's a reason why every other manufacturer moved away from that design. Honestly, it's the most impractical camera I've ever used in a professional setting. It's a beautiful camera and I love the results it produces, but I hate the menu system and overall interface.

The Q menu feature is ok, but I never use it because you can’t actually go into the settings from that page. Instead you have a few surface level settings available for you to control. Why couldn’t it just be a shortcut? Also, the user settings are so long and so over the top, that I’ve never been able to find anything I wanted the first time around. Finally, the camera doesn’t have a fully useable touch screen. 

So many photographers keep talking about how great the Fuji menu system is, but honestly, it’s by far the worst I’ve ever used. Despite this, Fuji cameras produce such wonderful results that I completely overlook these “quirks”.

8. Nikon

Immediate disqualification for having the lens attach the wrong way.

Panasonic and Olympus (Nikon)

I simply haven’t built enough experience with Panasonic and Olympus cameras yet, so, I can’t really comment extensively on them. What I will say is that my impression of their interface was mostly positive.

The same is true for Nikon, they’re just an easy target.

What Do You Think?

If you conduct a poll online asking people which camera menu system is the best, more than likely, Canon will win. This happens pretty much every time but, I don’t think we can conclude that Canon is the best just yet. The reason I say this is because it could be down to the fact that more people shoot with Canon; which essentially means that more people can vote for Canon.
Even though Sony has been generating a lot of sales, more people own Canon cameras than any other current manufacturer.
What we generally see, is people tend to vote for the brand they shoot with. Due to this, It’s difficult to make any objective conclusions about which camera has the best menu system.

Nevertheless, here is a poll to see what you all think.

Final Thoughts and Suggestions

There are a couple of things that camera manufacturers need to change. Firstly, stop limiting touch screens. Dear god, this is such a punchable offense. I don’t care what the nonsense excuse is… stop it. If you’re going to put in a touch screen, then let it be useable across the whole menu and not just to select focus points. Sony and Fujifilm, I’m looking at you.

Almost every camera on the market right now needs a larger screen. The tiny, low resolution screens need to go. Sony is the worst for this. The screens in every a7 series camera is garbage level bad. What’s even worse is that Sony has no excuse. I’m pretty such they have more experience in screens than almost any other camera manufacturer.

Ultimately, it comes down to your own personal preferences. I’m sure many of you will vehemently disagree with me about my preferences, but that’s what they are. Whatever camera you’re most comfortable with, is probably going to be the one with the best menu system.

Log in or register to post comments


Previous comments

As a Fuji shooter, I'm quite envious of that Panasonic remote app. It looks useful and fairly comprehensive.

DAVID PARK's picture

RE FUJI: Sadly, I agree mostly with your comments about Fuji. That said, as an ex-Canon user [and its menu is better no doubt], it's the X100F I always take with me. As so many have said before, it just 'feels right' in your hands. I love it. But 'yes' I'd like its menu to be a lot more intuitive. Ha! like the Hasselblad's? Wow .. it is mind-blowingly good. Thanks for your stimulating post.

Hans J. Nielsen's picture

Usman Dawood
I didn't vote as all I have ever tried is the menu of 4 modern cameras from 2 of the manufacturers.

Looking at the votes though - it seems you are wrong.

You know; the majority are always right or are they just the majority?

Usman Dawood's picture

I’m wrong about what I like?

Hans J. Nielsen's picture

You could easily be wrong about things you like.
900+ people think you are :-)

Usman Dawood's picture

You're getting opinions and preferences mixed up here lol.

The poll is not about whether I'm right or wrong cause that wouldn't make sense haha. The poll is about what other people prefer.

The conclusion you can draw is that my preferences don't necessarily match other peoples preferences which is kind of normal...

Alex Yakimov's picture

The most counterintuitive thing is Nikons ... menu banks on d cameras and lack of custom button selected mode af activation on the z series.

Rohan Gillett's picture

I haven't used many camera systems, but I've never had any trouble with Pentax and Fujifilm. When I shot Sony, that was a killer ... their menus was the main reason I left.

Dario Dusio's picture

Best menù? Nikon.
Worst one: Sony.
In between Fuji and Canon.

Really stop this "sony best bla bla nonsense". Or are you paid from them?

Usman Dawood's picture

Sony came 4th...

People will say I'm crazy, but I think Olympus is great. Most of the stuff buried in menus are items I'm not going to change on a regular basis. The Super Control Panel has everything I would access on a regular basis in one screen. And you can set it to stay on the rear screen. As soon as I take by eye from the viewfinder, the screen turns on with my most used settings.

Usman Dawood's picture

Nothing crazy about liking something :)

Martin Peterdamm's picture

I would say hasseblad has the only usable ui and the rest is so far behind and bad that it is embarassing to rank them. We have 2020, 13 years after the first Iphone the camera interfaces are so bad, like they are stuck in the 80/90s. really good retina ips displays are costing nothing - you can get a 1080p iphone ips replacement touchscreen for 30 euro - no camera back display comes close to this quality ……… why? I want to have big 5 inch touchscreen displays on the back of any camera. with a good interface you can remove a loot of the tiny buttons und the back. less stuff which can break. make a good contextual ui design by ui professionals. I wanna have a camera from the post iphone era, not a bulky vcr interface. and if I can make another wish, make them easy user replaceable like on the pre x iphone, just two screws and a connector.

I have to agree -- hassleblad is great but the rest are kindovan embarrassment to the decade we live in...

Regarding his take on Fuji:
>hate using top dials because you can’t use them while holding the camera with both hands, ready to take a shot

You can actually configure the camera to select aperture, iso, and shutter speed (and even EC) using the front and rear dials -- just like every other camera. It just has different defaults than the author was used to.

I'm sure he'd argue that its a failing in the menu system that he didn't know that -- but the section on Nikon makes me believe he's not the most patient when things are different from what he's familiar with.

I think opinions like this are why cameras are not as progressive as they could be; everyone is resistant to change and innovation. they want what they had before. Consequently camera technology and UI stagnates. I'd like to see someone really give this some thought and make a truly compelling user experience. I find almost all camera menus quite dated -- as if we are still living in the 80s.

There will be naysayers who don't like change (and who can't even handle a camera mount turning in a different direction) but I embrace innovation...and progress. hassleblad leads the way; the rest are variants on how _not_ to build a user interface in 2020

Usman Dawood's picture

"I think opinions like this are why cameras are not as progressive as they could be"


Hasselblad got the number one spot...

I feel like you're intentionally being obtuse or missing vital parts of the article to create your own narrative.

Also what are you on about with Nikon? It sounds like you're taking my tongue and cheek comments about the company, personally. Also for a bit of context, my experience with Nikon is limited to the FM2. You're making some huge leaps and lots of unfounded claims about me.

Are you a troll?

> I feel like you're intentionally being obtuse...

Yes, I know hassleblad got the top spot in your rankings; if you left it at that, I'd have nothing further to say on the subject.

However, you undermined yourself with this quote: "I hate Fujifilm’s menu system. Fuji's menu system is kind of like Argos here in the UK. Every retailer decided on one way of running a shop and Argos thought, no, we want to be different." That was the part that I was referring to when I stated that opinions like this make camera manufacturers risk averse.

> Also what are you on about with Nikon? It sounds like you're taking my tongue and cheek comments about the company, personally

I don't even shoot Nikon so I don't see how or why I'd take it personally. I feel like it's the manufacturer that's most likely to go bankrupt in the next 10 years because they're slow to adapt to a rapidly changing camera industry...

> Are you a troll?

If you're implying I'm here to just stir up drama, no. I'm genuine in my opinions. It may appear that way because I did not enjoy this article...and you can't understand why

the tl;dr is -- its something I really care about because I've shot quite a few different brands and because, professionally, I work regularly with very talented UX designers. I was excited to read the headline.

Addressing camera usability is the biggest thing holding the industry back (and would bring it back from its recent, massive downfall)...but the content of this article was pretty superficial, incomplete, and sometimes even misinformed

I don't understand an article answering the question of which camera OEM has the best menu system but then males this statement, "I simply haven’t built enough experience with Panasonic and Olympus cameras yet, so, I can’t really comment extensively on them. What I will say is that my impression of their interface was mostly positive."

Many reviews have been written about the Panasonic LUMIX menu system being one the easiest, most intuitive menu systems in the market. By contrast Sony has been stated to have the worst of any of them for years.

I would strongly suggest properly reviewing Panasonic, Olympus and Nikon. Then come back with an update to this article.

Usman Dawood's picture

I agree about Sonys menu system but the custom buttons make up so much that I would probably still rate it higher than Panasonic. I have some experience with those cameras but I didn't feel it would be right to list them at this stage.

It's an opinion piece about what I've found and what I like up to now. I'll consider getting the last three in at some point too.

Matthew Lacy's picture

Wait. Nikon just has their lens mount backwards? I've only ever shot Nikon and Canon, usually Nikon, and just assumed Canon's was backwards. Are there any others that mount in the same direction?

Tony Tumminello's picture

It's the whole "righty-tighty, lefty-loosey" concept where twisting right on things like screws tightens them. With Nikon you twist the lens left to "tighten" (mount) it. My old Bronica SQ-Ai medium format camera is the same way as Nikon and it drives me insane as every other system that I uses the "righty-tighty" system.

Their zoom is "backwards" as well. Put a ruler in front of you with the numbers pointing the right ways up, and it reads left-to-right with smaller numbers on the left. On a Nikon lens, the smaller numbers are on the right side.

Nikon's exposure compensation/light meter in the viewfinder is also "backwards". Most cameras go from -3EV/0/+3EV (again, similar to the ruler example where smaller numbers are on the left), while Nikon goes +/0/-. Thankfully I believe this one can be switched in the settings.

Matthew Lacy's picture

I had never thought about any of that. I'm young enough to never have shot film, and my first DSLR was a Nikon, so it just seems natural to me, but man. I never expected to learn this.

I do love Canon's menu system. I missed it when I moved to Fuji. My biggest issue with Fuji's menu system is that Fuji has limited the way you can use it. For example, the Q menu and the custom memories seem primarily geared toward JGP shooters. Want to add that low contrast orange and gray display mode to the Q menu for quick access? You can't. Want to add the state of the self-timer to a custom memory? You can't. Want to add the option to toggle on and off the exposure simulation mode for the EVF to My Menu? You can't.

Sony menus before Fujifjilm ? Hum...how much the author doesn't like physical dials shouldn't cloud the judgement. Sony have the worst menu system who dont make any sense...Fuji, anyone having used a digital camera before can understand it in minutes, no context here.

Rich Dyson's picture

I run a beginners photography workshop so I have come across pretty much every manufacturer (with the exception of Hasselblad). Canon's system is fairly intuitive and the descriptions of what's in the menu options are easily available by pressing the info button. I find it unbelievable that Nikon continues to send cameras out where you have to switch on the options to be able to toggle through to view histograms, highlights and shooting info. It should be on by default and you need to go into a menu and switch it off imho.

Imho, the BEST menu system is no other than Samsung's. Yes, it's a dead system but still, NX1 and NX500 had an amazing user interface.

What a dumb, lazy comment about the Nikon menu system. If the author has no experience with it, just say so, instead of purporting to disqualify Nikon for irrelevant reasons. Moreover, Usman's comment about how Nikon lenses mount is dumb standing alone, as Nikon's F-mount is one of the very oldest existing lens mount designs and predates many of the other designs. Just another dumb article from Usman.

Usman Dawood's picture

You’ve taken an obvious tongue and cheek comment far too seriously.

Why do lazy, inept people always use the "it was just a joke" defense as a free-pass to say anything; you prob think D Chon should learn to take a joke; your readers think you should learn to write an article

Usman Dawood's picture

Well, do you think it's ok for people who are offended to be allowed to control what others say and think?

More comments