Why Apple Still Rules, Microsoft Is OK, and Everyone Needs to Chill Out

Why Apple Still Rules, Microsoft Is OK, and Everyone Needs to Chill Out

On one hand, it’s understandable to be territorial over the features in our technology and sensitive to change. But technology inherently demands change — and that change is demanded at the fastest rate possible. We can complain about it all day long, but if we stop complaining at the whims of our feelings and start thinking logically, we can and should start to feel better as we realize the true nature of our so-called upgrade-cycle and innovation-searching frustrations. In reality, the only thing lacking innovation is our expectation.

Media loves nothing more than punchy headlines. Headlines that claim Apple is on its way down and can’t innovate as Microsoft looks to beat it at its own game are nothing more than journalist-sanctioned click-bait gold, but make little sense for those actually interested in good journalism.

Sure, the Microsoft Surface Studio is flashy with its new rotating input device, but how practical is it, really, compared to other options that are or will become available? Time will tell, but as pretty and fun and swanky as it looks, there are a number of aspects to the device that make this one seem more like a gimmick than anything else. I'm not yet sold.

Sure, it could end up being amazing. But I'm not yet convinced that the Surface Studio's new Dial is that much better than other already-existing input devices. For those that want more dial-like controls, we've already had fully modular and customizable options such as Palette.

A Short and General History

Apple has a history not of being first to the market with various technologies, but of bringing features we need only when the technology to implement them is ready (though we, ourselves, are often not quite ready).

The Mac was far from the first desktop personal computer. The iPhone was far from the first smartphone. The iPad was far from the first tablet. But Apple launched each of these products with features that made perfect sense in the time and technological environment in which they were born.

The same thing happened with feature changes within these product lines. As data port technologies such as USB and Thunderbolt matured and improved, technology had to adopt these changes eventually. In some cases, Apple waited (such as with the advent of USB 3.0) for the peripheral market to catch up. In other cases (such as with the DVD drive and the iPhone’s headphone jack), Apple brazenly led the charge in ridding the world of a fading technology in favor of better, modern technologies.

No matter how you look at it, Apple's newest laptops are sleek, powerful, envy-worthy computers. The trade-offs to make for them require nothing different from anything else we've been doing. We're just going to need a few different cables than the ones we currently have.

These changes aren’t always easy to swallow, but Apple’s proven track record of doing what makes sense to give the world a little nudge forward should earn it a little slack. Many of Apple’s biggest fans chastised the company for dropping the DVD drive with the Retina MacBook Pro. And yet, looking back, Apple made this decision at the perfect time. Since Netflix and Amazon and iTunes have done such a great job of filling in the media market, no one actually needed a DVD drive anymore. Software was quickly becoming online-only (subscription-based software was yet another trend around the corner). And the DVD drive was obsolete. We just didn’t know it, yet. But Apple did. And we should trust Apple to know what it’s doing today.

Lack of Innovation

The entire “Can Apple innovate without Jobs?” question is a tired one. Unfortunately for the company, it’s hard to innovate when everyone is looking for ways to prove you’re not. But what is innovation? Some of us want to be wowed by another product category or a completely new type of electronic, as the iPhone was at the time of its introduction.

The only problem with that is that, again, the iPhone wasn’t that new. It was just the best incarnation of a device we’d been using for quite some time. It might seem rough to trivialize something that revolutionized the smartphone industry and changed our lives in such a big way. But it’s true. It didn’t invent how we spoke. And the entire idea of the device was to be the last portable electronic device we needed. So why are we still searching for something new and different that we don’t need?

The iPad is a great example of this. Everyone wants a new product, and Apple gives it to them in the form of the iPad. And yet, everyone complains that the iPad isn’t necessary. And if they like the iPad, they complain that the portable computer is no longer necessary.

In reality, this should all be OK without the need for complaints. Not everyone needs one device or another. The iPhone is designed to be and should be the only one-device-fits-all product. As for the rest, make your decision, buy what you need, and enjoy the rest of your life without freaking out if or when something new comes out.

The New MacBook Pros and System Performance

Of course, technology still needs to move forward. And it’s fair to expect regular updates as technology improves. Apple did wait quite some time to introduce new laptops this time around, but the reality is that Intel took quite some time to release new processors that would make it worth the upgrade. They even announced an entire change in the rate at which they would progress with their manufacturing processes.

How much thinner do people expect it to get?

Still, if we pause to take a look at what Apple really accomplished in these new computers, it’s hard to see how they aren’t amazing. They’re thinner than and as light as a MacBook Air, but perform at levels good enough to edit 4K video, run multiple 5K screens, and transfer data at more than three gigabytes per second — more than six times the rate of most of today’s high-end solid state drives. Battery life remains unchanged, and we get up to four, lightning-fast, state-of-the-art Thunderbolt 3 ports that can handle anything you throw at them with greater expandability and flexibility than any other port — ever. And if you want to complain about processor speed or other specs, just remember numbers aren’t everything (this iPhone versus Galaxy test shows how great hardware-software integration can make lower-featured devices outperform those that feature over-killed specifications).

Sure, there are some caveats. You need to get an adapter or two for most of your devices (for now). The SD card slot is missing. And there’s no dedicated HDMI out. But can we be real about the practicality of these features for just a moment?

None of this is anything new. Ports have been improving and changing rapidly in the last 10 years. We already need, have, and use cables between all of our peripherals. What’s the difference between using a few different cables than the ones we have? Soon enough, our peripherals will ship with the same ports, too, and all of this will be a distant memory.

The SD card isn’t necessarily going to be as ubiquitous as we think it is. The organization that manages the Compact Flash standard threw its support behind the XQD format with the newly announced CFexpress format to likely be backwards-compatible with XQD. For the professionals such as a lot of us that really need fast transfer rates, our cameras support a variety of different technologies (from CFAST to CF to SD and XQD), so many of us are using separate, dedicated readers anyway. And for a good chunk of the general public, most consumer cameras feature wireless image transfer, which will only become more and more common with time. The absence of the SD card slot is Apple's way of saying, "It just won't matter for that much longer, anyway."

And HDMI out? Really? I could have gone without this port a lot sooner, especially considering the frequency with which I actually used it. Thunderbolt 3 and the way that it paves for the future is brighter than any of these. Now, everyone has the flexibility and expandability for anything they could ever want. Your I/O ports are no longer suited to only a handful of people who happen to need those exact ports just perfectly. Everyone has the ability to get one adapter that perfectly suits them.

Apples and Oranges

Getting back to Microsoft and its supposed overshadowing of Apple’s keynote event, Microsoft’s greatest innovation is simply the fact that it made another computer and is continuing to make them in general. As great of a job as their team did with the sturdiness of the design and the implementation the true-to-life display size (12-point font on the screen of the Microsoft Surface Studio is the same size as when printed on a sheet of paper), it’s just a big touchscreen desktop with a new input device from which only professional designers will really benefit.

The Surface Studio is beautiful, but it's not any more of a game-changer than any other new-ish computer out there. Hewlett-Packard released the TouchSmart back in 2007. This is just better (as it should be, by now).

Meanwhile, the comparison between the two rivals’ events is moot, since so many seem to forget the fact that Microsoft is releasing a professional desktop for designers while Apple is releasing portable notebooks fit for anyone that wants a step up to the on-the-go power-user. The two devices are in completely different categories.

Naturally, desktop fans are still waiting for Apple to revamp the iMac — and rightly so. The iMac, too, hasn’t seen a meaningful update in far too long. And I won’t get you all started on the lack of refreshes for the Mac Pro. But with new processor releases from Intel around the corner, I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s more to follow soon.

Not at all to take away from Microsoft, but to sit around and say Apple is slacking and Microsoft is blowing away the competition is absurd. Look at the performance really being offered and the subsequently improved portability. It’s impressive — period.

In a few months, the media will likely sing the same song — at least until Apple can please its investors with record profits once again, as is largely expected next quarter. Yet the general public will be more or less silently loving their new MacBook Pros because they really are the best computers around.

Meanwhile, for PC lovers, Microsoft is doing a great job of producing some competition-worthy computers for its professional users. Why is everyone in such a hurry to get in another fight over all of this?

Adam Ottke's picture

Adam works mostly across California on all things photography and art. He can be found at the best local coffee shops, at home scanning film in for hours, or out and about shooting his next assignment. Want to talk about gear? Want to work on a project together? Have an idea for Fstoppers? Get in touch! And, check out FilmObjektiv.org film rentals!

Log in or register to post comments
110 Comments
Previous comments

I think he's discussing more about who did better with both apple and microsoft's recent hardware release.

Are you kidding right? Did you see the price of the new MacBook pro? Can anybody really think they worth it???? There is no war. Only stupid people who don't consider any other option.
Btw I used osx for many years so I know what I'm talking about...

I think you are jumping to conclusions about Apple "ruling" and Microsoft is "just ok."

As a photographer, engineering student, and programming student, Apple products make it significantly more difficult for me to achieve all that I need for school, work, and hobbies. Apple's products are overly simplified and have less features when it comes to networking, interfacing, and writing simple software and apps.

I am not a huge fan of Microsoft either, especially in recent years. I have never been a fan of microsoft tablets and computers, but I run Windows on all my computers (specifically windows 7 professional). I am not a fan of windows 8 or windows 10, and I am very hesitant to move towards them.

I have recently considered making the very bold transition to Linux, specifically Ubuntu. Ubuntu offers great opportunities for developers, programmers, and software enthusiasts. The downside, however, is the lack of software. Adobe specifically only offers software for Windows or Mac, which leaves linux users to inferior software. The upside; it's fast and it's free. And you can customize it.

It all comes down to personal preference. Windows is in my opinion better for file management, documents, and business practices, while I'll admit apple does have an edge when it comes to artists and digital design. Linux is more customization and very powerful, and is great for very knowledgeable (Read: Geeky) users like myself.

Sorry... but anything UNIX is far superior to NTFS and any OS with a registry. The entire Interent runs on it.

As to an Adobe Linux port: some of us have been fighting the Good Fight for years:
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1249799

I didn't care when they got rid of the floppy drive or the DVD drive or even the headphone jack on the new iPhone. But a maximum of 16 GB of RAM (it's 2016 FFS), no MagSafe (we had to get it 2.1mm thinner!!!!), and a $700 increase on the base 15" model for some stupid touch bar? You can stay on the Apple bandwagon all you want. They've made it very clear their computers take a back seat to phones, tablets, and watch bands.

Why do you need more than 16GB of ram?

Hey g coll, I can't tell you why Brian Schmittgens needs more ram. He's not good at math seeing as the new MBP costs the same as the old one but he looks like a cool dude (Awesome beard, Brian), is a stay at home dad and likes yankee candles. I'd probably hang out with him and like it.

I can, however, tell you why I need more than 16gb of RAM. I sometimes work on composites with 30+ layers of 60mp or 80mp files and now that number is going to grow to 100mp. With multiple layers of high resolution files; things add up quickly. Now I know what you're thinking... masked smart objects, yes, this helps. But even with masked smart objects, my working files can easily get up over 300GB on the regular. Files are getting bigger every day.

I already have 128GB ECC matched RAM on my mac pro and I'd LOVE 256GB. I have a 512GB swap drive and that helps.

Why on earth would I be excited for 16 GB RAM on this machine? The entire reason I've been holding out on a laptop upgrade for the last 4 years was for the new bridge architecture that would allow Apple to offer MBPs with 64+ GB RAM.

I know they can do it now as the new bridge architecture easily supports 128GB RAM.

OK. I'll bite and lay it out for you according to many techies in the know... that I know... about why Apple decided to go with 16GB max RAM.

1) Mac OSX is optimized for releasing RAM as needed for quite some time (as is iOS which is built on OSX) and also utilizing the GPU as much as they can.

2) Look at those SSD and IO specs one more time: 3.1GB/second throuput speeds; then add Thunderbolt 3.0 speeds if you're a serious pro and need fast swap disks;

3) Now... and this is where so many people get bent out of shape (literally?), RAM vs. battery usage and then total weight and size. Something has to give to make it a pound lighter... and thinner... and still have the same battery usage of 10 hours.

A simple guess here says that Apple decided to weigh (pun intended) the benefit of portability vs. the speed of the SSD and ports to be worth more than 16GB additional RAM. As with their iOS devices, Apple has long favored battery life, thinness, and fast SSD/Flash over RAM specs for quite some time, AND they often win the "Real Speed Specs" which are those in everyday usage.

No Dollars just donuts, I bet you won't notice the missing 16GB RAM as much as you would miss the extra 3-4 hours of battery time... on a location shoot... with a portable computer.

No, I don't currently edit on a laptop. I'd love to. I shoot to a laptop and edit on a mac pro with a 24" eizo and I fly that gear all over.

I flew 120K miles in 2015. I'm at 140kish miles so far for 2016. I shoot on location and when I don't have the luxury of a digitech on site, it's all me. It's not always back home right away. It's usually somewhere else. So I process assets in hotel rooms.

Ok Mike. So basically your 300GB layered PSD files will be edited on a desktop anyway, correct? Why are you worrying about Laptop RAM when the serious photoshop work would be done on your desktop.

And while I'm here; 300GB file size? really? For such uniquely specialised work you wouldn't be using a laptop from start to finish on this job. Do you think Apple should cater to your unusually specific need?

I myself regularly work on 1 to 3GB files often (nowhere near 300GB but equally these can contain a lot of layers) and I currently have 8GB of RAM.

Apples and oranges.

Well, I'd like to think they'd cater to my need but I'm not crazy :)

I would LOVE to be able to edit start to finish on the laptop and not have to bring along a desktop.

Do you do any video? I don't but I'm wondering what the guys that have to edit 4k video do.

The lenovo P50 and P70 have available XEONs and and 64gb ECC ram. THAT'S what I wish I could get in a MBP.

Wouldn't that be great? I would gladly pay extra for it in both cash and weight.

But I totally understand that we are more of a minority and Apple needs to sell their laptops to the masses. I get it. I just wish I could still pay extra for a pro machine. My last MBP was bleeding edge. It had the most performance possible in a laptop computer. Now I have to go to lenovo if I want a mobile workstation.

"wondering what the guys who have to edit 4k video do"...hey, that's me! what will I do? Not buy this underwhelming new MBP that's for sure. It wouldn't be able to edit its way out of a wet paper bag in our 4k workflow (and yes, we edit in the field on laptops, for dailies, etc.)...also worth mentioning, they didn't even put a 4k display in it! (check out Razer, MSI, etc) To be clear, I'm an Apple fan, love the OS, wish I could get a new one, but no way could these MBP's handle our workflow... we edit on window's machines that can handle a heavy video workflow. They really should've just renamed these the new MB airs.

Hey! I'm really loathing moving to a windows machine. I don't hate the OS but I am used to all of the niceties that Mac OS has (unified messaging, etc.) but maybe I would be more productive if I didn't have those types of distractions. Capture One runs the same in a windows environment as it does in a mac os environment.

Thanks for the recommendations!

1. The previous base model was $1700. The new base model is $2400. Is that not correct (seriously, not being sarcastic)?
2. I'm not a stay at home dad. The "stay at home husband" line is a joke because I work from home and do most of the cleaning and cooking in my house. But yeah, I love me a good Yankee Candle.

My bad. I was comparing the previous base 13" to the current base 13".

I'm in the same boat... except I'm horrible at cleaning.

They're still selling the previous 15" base model with Thunderbolt 2 and the other old specs for $2,000. Not sure how it compares to what was offered before the announcement price- or spec-wise.

Working on large Ps projects you can use up tons of RAM. But also in say video editing you can really benefit from 32gb or even more. And if you are like me that are pretty heavy on the multitasking I can easily have Chrome and a bunch of other small programs like spotify and so on use up 8gb of RAM easily. This means only 8Gb left for Ps or lightroom which is too little for it to run smoothly.

I haven't owned a Macbook but I have been considering to save up and get one but the new specs are a bit of a let down as I'm used to a pretty high end windows rig.

Just went from 16gb to 32 gb ... it's almost as big a jump as that from 8gb to 16gb. You should try it. Oh yeah, you probably can't.

"it’s just a big touchscreen desktop with a new input device" pls stop the apple fanboyism....
the ipad wasn't the first tablet, it was just a better tablet, the macbook wasn't the first laptop...

The thing with the new macbook is that "Apple is releasing portable notebooks fit for anyone" but they make it much less portable when you have to carry all the adapters around....

PS: "Sure, the Microsoft Surface Pro is flashy with its new rotating input device" its called surface studio, not surface pro ....

I'm a bit surprised by this blinkered article. I'd be your typical crossover user. I have many Apple and Windows devices. I think the Apple phone and iPad software is very good, however I find MacOS was worse to use than Windows 10(which I also don't think it that good) . I find MacOS unintuitive and overly restricted . I have a Surface Pro 4 and I like it. It's not super amazing but it runs Photoshop and Lightroom really well and it travels well. I think Apple missed a trick not producing a giant IPad . I can see the Windows Surface Studio being popular with executives. It looks appealing. Apple is not innovating - the watch was the last new device and it's not great. Apple got lucky with the demise of Samsungs Galaxy Note. That's really hurt Samsung .

Regardless of new gimmick on the Surface Studio; it's still running Windows so I wouldn't even consider it. Also the novelty will wear off soon enough once people realise that this new gimmick is just that.

Being older than your average reader, I remember similar articles being written about Microsoft vs IBM, Windows vs DOS, Excel vs Lotus 123, et al.

I'm just bummed that neither of them have Zip Drives in them. Where are all the headlines about this atrocity?

You really need to upgrade dude. Zip drives are so 2015. Jaz is where it's at.

Dude, have you forgotten the Sony Minidisc?? So much awesomeness!

I actually had a MiniDisc player. At the time, mp3 quality was so shitty, and a CD burner and good portable CD player would've cost around the same as the MiniDisc player. I only had it a couple years before upgrading to an iPod, but I stand by that decision.

This should be titled...
"I'm a Mac/Apple fan and they'll always rule, Microsoft is OK (meh), and everyone needs to shut up with the New Mac Book Pro"

So, when "Apple has a history not of being first to the market with various technologies ..." it's innovation on an existing base. But when MS does the same it " is just better (as it should be, by now)". Sounds like fanboy thinking to me.

Truth is Apple has lost at least part of the thread. Bumps on iPhones (that was not a goblin you just heard, it was Jobs rolling in his grave). A hideous battery pack as well? An iPad that is unusable with one hand? Really? Mice with chargers on the bottom? iTunes stuck in 2007? Should I mention Apple TV?

That said, Apple does superb work in many areas - I'm not trying to say they suck. But I also won't look at the supposed Emperor and say, "Nice Suit Dude".

Apple is likely going to lose to Microsoft and OEMs, in case you have not noticed Microsoft is picking apart Apple Ecosystem with their R&D department and OEMs...iPad sales are in the gutter due to SP3/4 and variants, Mac sales will follow with Surface Studio/Surface Book and variants, Without iPads and Macs Apple ecosystem is not appealing anymore...go after Watch and TV then iPhone (Their main prize)

This will not end well for Apple the strategy is to defeat iPad and Mac to weaken Apple eco then come out with both Surface TV , Surface Wearable and Surface Phones and they and OEMs go to town.

They tried a frontal assault with Lumia that did not work due to apps, they now will weaken Apple to the point Surface Phone and its new category replace the iPhone and concentrate on bots.

IPhone globally is already shrinking from 18% down to 14% not a far stretch for Surface Phone and other Windows 10 Mobile devices to get to double digits and surpass iPhone. When they are ready. It'll be a new mobile category.

I've seen this before and know how it ends...."Cloud First, Mobile First" is not just a talk..its 100% real.

Remember Microsoft was under 10 years of DOJ restrictions so they build Azure to compete and eventually surpass AWS...now with Surface they create new categories and change the rules.
During those 10 years Apple and Google rose.

Apple and Google will struggle, so will Sony and Salesforce. Microsoft's back and getting back to competing. In their sights...Apple and to an extent Google, SalesForce, AWS, Sony

Apple had a good run and its coming to an end. So Apple fans should freak out Microsoft and army of OEMs is coming full force gunning for their ecosystem and user base. Apple is stumbling.

In reality the iPhone nearly killed PC's and Windows ...it didn't now the market disruption comes. Game on Apple.

The Surface Phone doesn't exist as people as people want it (or hope) and if MS releases a phone it won't be a me to hardware. The closest we've got a Surface Phone is the HP X3 which is the vision of where MS is going with phones. If you look at the message about the HP X3 they say it's a 3-in-1 device that has a phone. The sooner people accept this and move on then happier they'll be.

MS has consistently said they're less concerned with now but more where the next curve is going to be. What comes after phones? If there's a Surface Phone, or whatever it will be called, it'll be released when MS feels it's ready and is has a USP to set the device apart, just like the Pro, Book and Studio which are all visions of what can be.

MS lost the mobile war, and they're not going to re-enter it any time soon instead relying on other OEMs to pick up the slack. MS isn't giving up the Mobile space, Win 10 mobile is the same OS as desktops and it's being actively developed.

The major problem for Apple is they that don't own the full stack of services required for modern hardware instead they are wedded to MS (and partially Amazon) for the backbone, be it Azure, Bing or Office. The only company that really compete with MS, and there's glaring holes in their 'folio, is Google. MS has already moved from a myopic my device only for their services and instead make them readily open to anyone. This shows in Apple's bottom line, they was reliant on meteoric sales of the latest iOS device to make their bottom line, whereas MS makes their money from multiple sources one of which rarely gets mentioned is their R&D that they ware willing to licence out.

Best article on the announcement. I wish I could Like or Upvote the article itself. Really tired of folk who have never even owned a Mac desktop/laptop throwing their 2 cent in. Someone asked about the 16GB Ram limit...a thread I've seen floating around from Reddit posits that the limitation comes from the Intel CPU which can't handle DDR4 level chips. So for now, Apple is forgoing power for power's sake to give users an option that is lighter than what they were using before hand. My only three beefs with the new MBPs is:

1) You'll have to use an adapter to plug in your iPhone 6/6s/7/7Plus (I still transfer music to my iPhone via wired connection...wamp wamp).

2) The base level MBP only gives you TWO Thunderbolt ports, which one will be in use while charging, so you effectively only have one. I wish they would've done four ports for 13" AND 15".

3) Storage is now via on-board SSD drive which means no way to upgrade your hard drive space after purchase. Better get that TB option out of gate or get used to using external HDs.

Only time will tell how useful and practical the Touch Bar will be. My guess is that eventually they want to replace the Keyboard (which IS a sorta outdated concept) with a full touch screen and the Touch Bar is their way of testing it out with real users. Other than that, it's a pretty solid laptop release on paper. I think it won't be too much longer for Apple to start designing their own CPUs (a la CPU chips in our iPhones) which should help with pricing and higher ram issues down the line.

Laptops and Desktops are going to become a niche product 10 years down the road anywayyyyyyy. The average person who ISN'T a creative can handle 98% of their computing needs on an iPad TODAY. I'm 42...I remember a time when just getting access to a computer required an arm & a leg.....now we carry them in our bags like it's nothing. Let's all stop being whiny b#tches and appreciate how far technology has come.

Most of the 13" models will/do offer four ports, so I think that is fair for the base model to skimp a bit. In a year or two, that'll probably change as well.

You may be happy to know that the base model 13" MBP was already taken apart, at which time it was discovered that there is access to the SSD, leading many to think it'll be replaceable with third-party options down the road. We'll see about that.

And you actually can up-vote the article at the very top, under the title! ;-) Glad you enjoyed it.

Doesn't look too promising according to this article: http://arstechnica.com/apple/2016/11/ifixit-new-macbook-pros-are-unsurpr...

I think we'll just have to wait for custom SSD options to pop up. It'll take time, they won't be cheap, and they almost certainly won't hit those 2-3GB/s speeds, but that's how it's always been with SSD upgrades for Macs.

“Exploding_m1”, in a thread on Reddit:

The true reason behind the lack of 32 GB or DDR4 is Intel. Skylake does not support LPDDR4 (LP for low power) RAM. Kabylake is set to include support, but only for the U category of chips. So no LPDDR4 support for mobile until 2018 I think.

One example is the Dell XPS 13. On the Dell XPS 13 version, you cannot go for 32 GB of RAM. Meanwhile, the 15 inches does give you that option, but you have to sacrifice battery life for it.

nice article lol

Just to remind me. Can you name just one really interesting innovation Apple came up with in the past three years. And no gimmicks please, real innovations.

Sure. Ones that PC drones will not immediately label a gimmick? Nah.

Oh good another mine is longer than yours 'article' on FS. Color me shocked. Perhaps we can have a Sony vs Canon 'article' tomorrow...

I find it really hard to trust the credibility of technology website when they clearly get religious for one brand over the other.

Mac guy here. AVID Mac guy. What Mac has going for it (and has always had going for it) has nothing to do with their hardware; it's the complete and impeccable stability of their software. iOS and Mac OS use their hardware- that doesn't stack up to the competition, numbers wise- and create a faster and more fluid experience. There are a lot of things that, to the average consumer, would suck for Apple to remove (3.5mm headphone jack, for example). I may be in the minority, but I'll take the reliability of a Macbook and Mac OS over the horrifyingly unstable and unpredictable Windows any time.

Stability in OS X? Here's a person who can't upgrade due to stability and other software issues. The same kind of problems that can plague Windows.

http://www.redsharknews.com/post/item/3896-thanks-to-apple,-this-is-the-...

@MJ I can only guess you haven't used Windows in a few years. It's been pretty rock solid for me since Windows 7.
That's like me saying Mac is so slow and I haven't used it since they were using PowerPC chips.

The only reason why I'm a Mac guy is my personal experience with its stability (save, of course, for the Mavericks debacle). With Canon being the exception, I'm not exactly loyal to any particular brand. In fact the only place where I'll defend Apple is on their computers. I feel like the iPhone is several years behind. To give you an idea as to my aversion to iPhones I would sooner buy a Note 7 (if, of course, the TSA still allowed it) because I feel as though Apple is insulting my intelligence. When they announced Apple Watch I literally laughed out loud. Microsoft, meanwhile, is making incredible and dare I say groundbreaking strides in interactive hardware- most notably with the Hololens. Apple, meanwhile, is essentially saying "We know you'll buy our stuff. Nobody does brushed aluminum unibodies like us".
If Windows is as reliable as OSX and I get to load it onto hardware that nearly triples the power of a Macbook for half the price then I am absolutely ready to jump ship.

I think Apple just upgraded the iMacs in the last 18 months when the screens all became retina, didn't they? You say the line hasn't been updated in a while.

But back to your main argument about INNOVATION. The "Touch Bar" (lovely name) seems like a modest compromise addition to the Macbooks. Something new they could crow about and get some attention for a few weeks. The potential of the Surface Dial will be filled out over the next year, but most of us were immediately surprised that MS pulled off what we used to expect from Apple: creating a new product that we didn't realize we needed. That reaction doesn't apply to the Touch Bar.

Apple is treading water, and Tim Cook is failing to direct this company, which so many of us professionals depend on.

You completely overlooked the Microsoft totally. Almost your whole article was on the Apple, and a tiny paragraph on the Microsoft product.

What really bothered me was the line

"but how practical is it, really, compared to other options that are or will become available?"

The point is that its available now. How do you compare to something that's not available yet? You rip on Microsoft for this, but Apple is "revolutionary" for requiring you to use dongles to use peripherals you own right now.

This whole article was one big fanboy congrats to Apple.

I'm disappointed. There is plenty of room in the Apple product line-up for a REAL pro level portable yet they seem to be pushing the MacBook Pro thinner and reducing functionality and expansion. I've been an Apple user long enough to have witnessed them pull the rug out from under several other "standards" over the years and claim it's in the name of pushing the industry forward. I don't buy it. I still have to deliver to clients that want CDs. As a working professional do I tell them "Sorry, I don't support that format any longer and you should get with the times." The memory is a joke and removing any ability to upgrade the machine in a years time makes it even more ridiculous to drop that kind of cash on a laptop that's crippled from the start.

There was a time when Apple really worked with industry leaders to develop technologies that allowed for innovation and efficient work flows. Remember Firewire, H.264, and Final Cut Pro? Those technologies solved real problems and were developed in tandem with big players in the professional market. Now Apple is catering to a different market and no amount of explanation will convince me they're not moving away from the niche company that catered to creative professionals.

I just don't get the whole "thinner is better" philosophy. If you're doing such intensive work as to require multiple monitors, etc. what's the big deal about a millimeter or two. They've thinned these things down to the point that they, while they are lighter than the bricks of old, are almost too cumbersome to use.

If I'm editing photos, I pull out my MacBook Pro, then a hard drive, then a card reader, then a USB hub, then a mouse. If someone wants a disk, then I attach a burner (outdated, I know. But some people still like it). Now, it's buy more adapters!

Someone mentioned the progression from serial ports through to USB. At least when manufacturers made that progression, they still included the old standard until the new was widely adopted. Add a millimeter or two to your power user products and give an extra port and maybe a bit more battery life. I doubt most would mind adding an extra gram or two

Both companies released something that its fanbase will enjoy. But I disagree that apple "rules"

More comments