On one hand, it’s understandable to be territorial over the features in our technology and sensitive to change. But technology inherently demands change — and that change is demanded at the fastest rate possible. We can complain about it all day long, but if we stop complaining at the whims of our feelings and start thinking logically, we can and should start to feel better as we realize the true nature of our so-called upgrade-cycle and innovation-searching frustrations. In reality, the only thing lacking innovation is our expectation.
Media loves nothing more than punchy headlines. Headlines that claim Apple is on its way down and can’t innovate as Microsoft looks to beat it at its own game are nothing more than journalist-sanctioned click-bait gold, but make little sense for those actually interested in good journalism.
Sure, the Microsoft Surface Studio is flashy with its new rotating input device, but how practical is it, really, compared to other options that are or will become available? Time will tell, but as pretty and fun and swanky as it looks, there are a number of aspects to the device that make this one seem more like a gimmick than anything else. I'm not yet sold.
A Short and General History
Apple has a history not of being first to the market with various technologies, but of bringing features we need only when the technology to implement them is ready (though we, ourselves, are often not quite ready).
The Mac was far from the first desktop personal computer. The iPhone was far from the first smartphone. The iPad was far from the first tablet. But Apple launched each of these products with features that made perfect sense in the time and technological environment in which they were born.
The same thing happened with feature changes within these product lines. As data port technologies such as USB and Thunderbolt matured and improved, technology had to adopt these changes eventually. In some cases, Apple waited (such as with the advent of USB 3.0) for the peripheral market to catch up. In other cases (such as with the DVD drive and the iPhone’s headphone jack), Apple brazenly led the charge in ridding the world of a fading technology in favor of better, modern technologies.
These changes aren’t always easy to swallow, but Apple’s proven track record of doing what makes sense to give the world a little nudge forward should earn it a little slack. Many of Apple’s biggest fans chastised the company for dropping the DVD drive with the Retina MacBook Pro. And yet, looking back, Apple made this decision at the perfect time. Since Netflix and Amazon and iTunes have done such a great job of filling in the media market, no one actually needed a DVD drive anymore. Software was quickly becoming online-only (subscription-based software was yet another trend around the corner). And the DVD drive was obsolete. We just didn’t know it, yet. But Apple did. And we should trust Apple to know what it’s doing today.
Lack of Innovation
The entire “Can Apple innovate without Jobs?” question is a tired one. Unfortunately for the company, it’s hard to innovate when everyone is looking for ways to prove you’re not. But what is innovation? Some of us want to be wowed by another product category or a completely new type of electronic, as the iPhone was at the time of its introduction.
The only problem with that is that, again, the iPhone wasn’t that new. It was just the best incarnation of a device we’d been using for quite some time. It might seem rough to trivialize something that revolutionized the smartphone industry and changed our lives in such a big way. But it’s true. It didn’t invent how we spoke. And the entire idea of the device was to be the last portable electronic device we needed. So why are we still searching for something new and different that we don’t need?
The iPad is a great example of this. Everyone wants a new product, and Apple gives it to them in the form of the iPad. And yet, everyone complains that the iPad isn’t necessary. And if they like the iPad, they complain that the portable computer is no longer necessary.
In reality, this should all be OK without the need for complaints. Not everyone needs one device or another. The iPhone is designed to be and should be the only one-device-fits-all product. As for the rest, make your decision, buy what you need, and enjoy the rest of your life without freaking out if or when something new comes out.
The New MacBook Pros and System Performance
Of course, technology still needs to move forward. And it’s fair to expect regular updates as technology improves. Apple did wait quite some time to introduce new laptops this time around, but the reality is that Intel took quite some time to release new processors that would make it worth the upgrade. They even announced an entire change in the rate at which they would progress with their manufacturing processes.
Still, if we pause to take a look at what Apple really accomplished in these new computers, it’s hard to see how they aren’t amazing. They’re thinner than and as light as a MacBook Air, but perform at levels good enough to edit 4K video, run multiple 5K screens, and transfer data at more than three gigabytes per second — more than six times the rate of most of today’s high-end solid state drives. Battery life remains unchanged, and we get up to four, lightning-fast, state-of-the-art Thunderbolt 3 ports that can handle anything you throw at them with greater expandability and flexibility than any other port — ever. And if you want to complain about processor speed or other specs, just remember numbers aren’t everything (this iPhone versus Galaxy test shows how great hardware-software integration can make lower-featured devices outperform those that feature over-killed specifications).
Sure, there are some caveats. You need to get an adapter or two for most of your devices (for now). The SD card slot is missing. And there’s no dedicated HDMI out. But can we be real about the practicality of these features for just a moment?
None of this is anything new. Ports have been improving and changing rapidly in the last 10 years. We already need, have, and use cables between all of our peripherals. What’s the difference between using a few different cables than the ones we have? Soon enough, our peripherals will ship with the same ports, too, and all of this will be a distant memory.
The SD card isn’t necessarily going to be as ubiquitous as we think it is. The organization that manages the Compact Flash standard threw its support behind the XQD format with the newly announced CFexpress format to likely be backwards-compatible with XQD. For the professionals such as a lot of us that really need fast transfer rates, our cameras support a variety of different technologies (from CFAST to CF to SD and XQD), so many of us are using separate, dedicated readers anyway. And for a good chunk of the general public, most consumer cameras feature wireless image transfer, which will only become more and more common with time. The absence of the SD card slot is Apple's way of saying, "It just won't matter for that much longer, anyway."
And HDMI out? Really? I could have gone without this port a lot sooner, especially considering the frequency with which I actually used it. Thunderbolt 3 and the way that it paves for the future is brighter than any of these. Now, everyone has the flexibility and expandability for anything they could ever want. Your I/O ports are no longer suited to only a handful of people who happen to need those exact ports just perfectly. Everyone has the ability to get one adapter that perfectly suits them.
Apples and Oranges
Getting back to Microsoft and its supposed overshadowing of Apple’s keynote event, Microsoft’s greatest innovation is simply the fact that it made another computer and is continuing to make them in general. As great of a job as their team did with the sturdiness of the design and the implementation the true-to-life display size (12-point font on the screen of the Microsoft Surface Studio is the same size as when printed on a sheet of paper), it’s just a big touchscreen desktop with a new input device from which only professional designers will really benefit.
Meanwhile, the comparison between the two rivals’ events is moot, since so many seem to forget the fact that Microsoft is releasing a professional desktop for designers while Apple is releasing portable notebooks fit for anyone that wants a step up to the on-the-go power-user. The two devices are in completely different categories.
Naturally, desktop fans are still waiting for Apple to revamp the iMac — and rightly so. The iMac, too, hasn’t seen a meaningful update in far too long. And I won’t get you all started on the lack of refreshes for the Mac Pro. But with new processor releases from Intel around the corner, I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s more to follow soon.
Not at all to take away from Microsoft, but to sit around and say Apple is slacking and Microsoft is blowing away the competition is absurd. Look at the performance really being offered and the subsequently improved portability. It’s impressive — period.
In a few months, the media will likely sing the same song — at least until Apple can please its investors with record profits once again, as is largely expected next quarter. Yet the general public will be more or less silently loving their new MacBook Pros because they really are the best computers around.
Meanwhile, for PC lovers, Microsoft is doing a great job of producing some competition-worthy computers for its professional users. Why is everyone in such a hurry to get in another fight over all of this?
I was avoiding commenting on this article, but i couldn't stop myself. Here it goes:
For Fstoppers, a renowned photography website in the US and abroad, this sort of non informative opinion driven article is a shame to present. It ads nothing to the equation and can only be seen as pure clickbait. Bashing one brand while favoring other is totally not necessary, whole not adding any true information.
For Adam, it is great that you love apple, you know what? I like apple too, but not to a point where blindness affects me. I'm a Canon user, ex-apple user, windows user. To come to a website like Fstoppers and display such "hate" towards something new, is only on pair with what Donald J. Trump would come up with.
Microsoft did trully innovate here and if they did not, as your article states (can i call this an article?), at least they did had the guts to deliver something fresh, to try and give us users something that could change how we percieve computers/tools.
Bottom line is, this sort of article damages the credibility of Fstoppers as a whole, community and as a source of information. I call this article true rubbish, fueled by some sort of brand hate that throws nothing valuable to the reader.
Sorry fot the poor english, I do try my best.
I am sorry but what a one-sided and arrogant article. I do not believe the issue is Microsoft is better than Apple or that Apple is going down. The lack of effort on Apple's part and as well as the neglect of the professional creative community in general is the problem. Not just photographers and videographers, but designers from a vast variety of industries use the MacBook Pro as well. Maybe you are too young to realize this. But graphic artists have been using Macs before Photographers started exploring the digital realm.
I do art, design, and photography. All are mediums for me to create my work. I am also a business man and I still need to do administrated work as well. When my MBP is not docked in my office, I am out at a client's location making a presentation or working on site. I do not have to carry any extra adapters or hub to setup and do what I am paid to do. That's because everything is included on my MBP. The majority of you may not see that as important. But to assume that a photographer only snaps pictures and does nothing else or has no other responsibilities as they are running their business is ignorant.
As for who is being innovated. Nothing that Apple has done with this MBP update has been innovated in my opinion. This has been Apple playing catch up. The OLED bar is not innovation but a gimmick. Maybe a very useful one for a certain percentage. But at least all the agencies and creatives i interact with in a daily basis believe it's a waste of space. We all would have preferred the latest gen processor and 32gb of ram with a higher performing graphics card. Thinner, lighter and that it comes in a different color is irreverent when it's about a product that is stationary the majority of the time on a flat surface. How do those features make it "PRO".
The only thing I will give Microsoft is that they are trying. As well as addressing the professional creatives. I do not see Apple doing that at all. I am not saying that any one brand is better than the other one. But at least one is trying. I for one will not support these new MBPs. I'll just stay with my old one for now.
Don't forget one thing. The creative industry has kept Apple on its feet before the iPhone in 2007. Only in the recent decade Apple has found it's new consumer market.
Thank you for this down to earth post. I can agree 100%.
Just by starting, I own one of the first MacBook Pro Retinas that came out, I have had iPhones ever since it was released in my country, there is also iPads and Apple TV's in my home. I also have a Windows PC, a Surface 3 PRO.
I don't go for the brand, I go for what I need. So I consider my self as not biased towards one or the other.
Lets first take a look at some statements here.
"""are nothing more than journalist-sanctioned click-bait gold"""
Which is exactly what this piece is.
"""Sure, the Microsoft Surface Studio is flashy with its new rotating input device, but how practical is it, really, compared to other options that are or will become available?"""
This in contrast to "Apple has a history not of being first to the market with various technologies, but of bringing features we need only when the technology to implement them is ready (though we, ourselves, are often not quite ready)"
So when Apple has taken something and innovated on it at the right time in the right setting and even though it might not be something entirely new, it was a brilliant move by Apple, when M$ tries to take some existing piece and make it better and the time might just be right to integrate it with the touch screen that is just not worth a mention?... Can you see the double standard here?
When your favorite does this, it's awesome, when others does it, it's just not... Seriously?...
You are absolutely right that only time will tell if this was really the right move or not, but that is no different from what Apple does... Apple has been able to hit the right moment historically, but they are not the only ones to be disruptive, others have as well over time, you even mention two who has them self been disruptive, Amazon and Netflix, but also Google, Spotify, etc...
In reality Apple haven't been disruptive for quite some time now.
"""No matter how you look at it, Apple's newest laptops are sleek, powerful, envy-worthy computers. The trade-offs to make for them require nothing different from anything else we've been doing. We're just going to need a few different cables than the ones we currently have."""
Their first MacBook Pro Retina was just that, it gave the competition something to aim for, and they did - there are 15" laptops out there which is nearly as thin and light but with 4K panels, which has a much higher pixel density than the retina, and other advances are also made.
And it's funny how you praise the advancements on the new MacBook with, """How much thinner do people expect it to get?""" while you completely ignore that the Surface Studio has the thinnest desktop panel out there. Again... a truly amazing when it's Apple is making things thinner, irrelevant when others are...
Well to use another phrase from your article which also fits on Apple's advances here: """This is just better (as it should be, by now)"""...
Personally I am disappointed with the new MacBook Pro, to me it is amazing how little they did, and what little they did concerns me greatly.
The touch-bar is merely a gimmick, and I am honestly not sure it's a positive one, and I am concerned that the over-sized track-pad won't allow me to rest my hands on my computer, which would become a serious issue.
I was actually looking to replace my 2012 retina, but I have to be honest, with the changes they made, I feel more like going for the old model, which then begs the question, is the new one really at all better, or is it just different and will cater for a different audience? As other vendors has 4K screens and similarly shin and light laptops, I might also consider leaving Apple again.
It's the same with my iPhone, is an old 5s, and from the iPhone 6 and on wards it seems like Apple stopped focusing on what made their own product great and started hunting the Android "Bigger is Better" mentality... So here I am also stuck in a disappointed mood, I hope they manage to update the iPhone SE during the next year with some of the features in the 6 or 7, mainly the 3D touch as that would look like my pick.
Last year Apple had me exited about their take on the pen for tablets (perhaps it's a small thing, but then its a small big thing to me), it seemed like they had though about allot of things I suddenly missing in my Surface Pro Pen experience, and it looked gorgeous and awesome so I noticed it, and making the switch from Surface Pro to iPad Pro entered my mind and is still there - At the same time - Microsoft disappointed with their Surface Book, not necessarily a bad product but there wasn't really anything which drew my attention about it and I even forgot about it - and nothing else from them got my attention.
This year the table is turned, there was nothing noteworthy from Apple's event but the new Surface Studio really got my attention, and that is EVEN considering that I won't ever buy one as I have no use for it in my line of work - regardless, it would be something I am itching to try - I can easily see it's potential for the segment it's targeted at, if expectations match the reality is obviously a thing to be seen.
Stop putting your favorites on a lonely petistal.
Uau, I have never seen such a desperate attempt at defending apple. You seem blind to the fact that apple is being completely outclassed by many manufacturers like hp, asus, Lenovo, etc who are delivering products that are not only at least as beautiful and well made as any MacBook, they are also far more usefull (more ports, more powerfull and with gorgeous touchscreens) and much more versatile, not to mention considerably cheaper. With windows 10 being as good as it is, there is exactly zero reasons to buy a MacBook pro, especially at that absurd price.
The new MCBP is brilliant. You can easily connect your Thunderbolt drive. If you use an adapter.
Or connect your new Iphone. Use an adapter. Or use your high-end headset on your new Ipone. Use an adapter. Connect an external screen. Use an adapter. Lucky you. There are usb-c cardreaders.
Your old one doesn't work on the new macbookPro. Apple is adapter heaven. For everything that's older than a few months, you need an adapter. Not to mention that lots of adapter you bought in the past, won't work on this new macbookPro.
But of course, the MCBP is very light but that gets annulled because of the adapters you have to drag along.
That is not innovation. That is form over function. That is being hysterical instead of being practical.
For the wanker(s), and judging by you and your article there are thousands, if not millions, this "new" paradigm might seem attractive, Mr Jobs (ex) and his snake oil salesmen will as usual flog it as "the next best thing". However, there are many of us (real working professionals) who do not appreciate having to go out and buy a thousand and one adapters so that Apple can work.
Sorry, but with this attitude, Apple is a dead technology
I'm sorry but Razers new line of laptops embarrasses the apple "pro" line.. MS Surface Studio is an amazing new product that you, an apple fanboy, are jealous of plain and simple. New Razer Blade min specs = i7 6700HQ (4 core 8 thread), GTX 1060 desktop gpu, 16GB RAM, 14" 1080p screen, 256GB SSD, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3, HDMI, 70 wh battery... all better don't you think. The mac is 3mm (17.9mm vs 14.9mm) thinner that's it.
"from which only professional designers will really benefit." Nailed it.... apple has forgotten the professionals and cater to the mass market. Sure, business move, 9/10 people will not buy a mac pro tower. They have forgotten and pushed aside the professionals who were the base for their business.
After 10 years on a mac or some sort, I just moved back to windows and actually really do love the move!!
The Apple Fanboy is strong with this one...
PC has been ahead of Mac for years. People just like their shiny objects and drinking the kool-aid. Mac users get so utterly defensive whenever PC "might" beat them, which is hilarious because the "might" was never a factor. I always get the same excuse all the time too..."But, but but, more people buy MAC!", yeah, and that line of thinking got us Donald Trump as President.
Point is, use whatever you like to edit, just realize your spending usually double, and often triple getting Mac for the same specs over PC.