Since I began taking photos 10 years ago, one constant has been that I have never been excited by gear. Granted, I like to have a nice camera and lens setup to shoot with, but it’s so rarely the focus of my attention. I’m happy to stick with the same gear until it falls apart, and I couldn’t even tell you what the latest model on the market is.
I remember when the day came to decide on my very first camera body. I knew I wanted to begin shooting, but I had no idea where to begin. How do you choose? Is the gear even important? After all, it’s the photographer that makes the image, right? In the end, my decision was made purely because the friend who promised to help me learn the basics was a Nikon user.
Since then, I’ve had various models. I began with the D60, later upgraded to the D90, before the D7200, and I now use a D500. Often, I’d upgrade because I felt it was what’s expected and that having an “old” model made me look amateur. In regards to lenses, for years, I used absolutely nothing outside of the 50mm. I’m a portrait photographer, and this lens is suited to almost every type of shot I wanted to take perfectly. With this lens, I never wanted for anything. And even though I have since broadened my horizons, adding two different lenses to my collection, the 50mm is still my go-to.
I find there are two types of photographer. First, there are those who love gear, enjoy spending money to have the latest models, and stay up to date with new releases. These photographers are usually the ones who come from a background of photography education. The other kind are those who fell into it somewhat: they picked up a camera and learned everything they know by making mistakes and trying again and will happily use whatever camera is at hand to take their images. The latter tend to be the more experimental, creative folk.
There’s an undeniable degree of snobbery in the photo industry, as if those who can’t afford the latest gear (or simply don’t care for it) are somehow inferior. Instead, we get lumped into the category of “Instagram photographer,” our successes being written off as a fluke.
The fact remains, my efforts are instead focused on two things: creative photoshoot ideas and learning how to maximize the potential of my camera. It’s of little interest to me if the various models released since mine have revolutionized the camera world, for I’ve spent many hours getting acquainted with the one I actually own. I know how it works, I know how to utilize it, and I know how to fix it if something goes wrong on set.
The rebirth of film photography in recent years only further reinforces that super-high quality, latest spec gear isn’t always the right answer. It’s as if we’ve gone so digital, we’ve exhausted it, and analog photography of years past is suddenly desirable again.
To those who suffer imposter syndrome, stop discrediting yourself. Being self-taught, being creative, and having zero investment in the technological side of photography are not crimes. The gear you use is largely irrelevant; it’s the ideas you bring to fruition with it that count.
Lead image: "Rolling on 50's" by Andrei.P, licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 .
All other images my own.
Gear is the least exciting part of photography for you because you shoot Nikon. 🤷♂️
Alex, please don't tell this to Lee. He seems to like his d850.
I think the humorous intention of my comment may have gone a bit over your head... Jack is one of my best friends and it was a bit of friendly banter.
Welp, I only know enough to know how much I don't know! Hope you wake up in a better mood tomorrow, dude. :)
Ok.
Ok.
Can confirm. Completely over your head. As a Nikon shooter even I got it. Perhaps because your head is so far up your.........
P.S. that was another joke, that you prolly didnt get. Dont worry man, they are jokes, not dicks. Dont take them so hard.
PPS thats another joke.
^^Tee-hee.... he said pee pee.
Three things:
1. It is OK to break the rules when you intentionally break the rules. You PROLLY didnt know that.
2. Scientists have recently found that most grammar nazis are jerks and likely less intelligent than they think.
PS. It is incorrect to start a sentence with "But"
BUT you had to come along and make an idiotic, ignorant comment. You PROLLY knew that, but did it anyway. BUT then again, in all likelihood, you just care far more about what other people do than what you do, as the rules don't apply to you right?
Furthermore, look up prolly in the dictionary:
prol·ly
/ˈprälē/
adverb-INFORMAL
probably.
"you prolly know this already"
Well are you a delicate little edge lord.
I don't get excited by gear, but I certainly do by what gear can do. A drone can provide images (and video) once unattainable to many photographers without a helicopter. An action cam like a go pro also can capture so much more than what once was thought possible. Even high frame rates, color depth, low light abilities - are worth getting excited about. You can easily create home movies - of near broadcast quality with software and equipment that is out of this world considered what I grew up with as a kid and an 8mm film camera.
"There’s an undeniable degree of snobbery in the photo industry, as if those who can’t afford the latest gear (or simply don’t care for it) are somehow inferior. "
This sounds like a straw man argument.
Who actually does this aside from a few random idiots?
I've found that most photographers are actually very encouraging towards those that are starting with simple, inexpensive stuff.
Go take a stroll over at the dpreview gear forums for a large helping of that attitude on display.
So you go specifically to a GEAR REVIEW forum, and are shocked that people are mostly concerned with gear? For realz? Like, I mean, common sense ever occur to you?
It's not digital GEAR review Einstein. It's digital photography review. Try reading for comprehension. They host both gear and non-gear forums.
"Go take a stroll over at the dpreview GEAR forums for a large helping of that attitude on display."
Sorry, but put the attitude down for a second and try reading comprehension. He specifically states to go to the gear forums for a large helping of that on display.
Try to not be so agro, you are seriously just looking for reasons to be upset.
Oh wow, I didnt realize that you were the creator of the original comment. Try reading your own comment I guess, you specifically stated the "dpreview gear forums"
This kind of snobbery exits in MANY fields (especially those with a significant hobbyist component) and not just photography.
But I've found (speaking from personal experience, at 70 I've seen a lot) that a good number of the snobs are NOT the pros, but are the pretentious amateurs. The pros (and skilled amateurs) are out there doing stuff and to these people, equipment is simply a tool and not a status symbol. But the posers try to up their reputation by buying and displaying the 'right' equipment.
So you believe that people who use "modern" camera has less knowledge of how it works?
The snobbery by the artsy-fartsy crowd is also undeniable, the crowd that only see their genre and think photographers who work with a lot of gear and have the knowledge are gear heads and not "artists" like them self.
I’ve met just as many snobs in the artsy fartsy world at photo exhibits than I have on, or thru Instagram. It’s just those on social tend to think that broadcasting their love for spending money on the newest and greatest think that exposure is also a form of currency.
There’s people that like to talk equipment and theirs people that like to talk technique. Then there are people that could not care less about either and let their work speak on its own, and its those people I learn the most from.
Very true. Sean Tucker is one of them:
https://www.youtube.com/user/seantuckermerge/videos
Sean Tucker is probably my favorite Youtube channel. I had my wife (not an artist at all) watch this video and she loved it as it pushed her to drive her career more for herself and not for others: https://youtu.be/atU31fMjZgg
"The gear you use is largely irrelevant; it’s the ideas you bring to fruition with it that count."
https://youtu.be/PaJQpgWV9f0
Only true if you don't have clients with specific requirements.
A good photographer can leverage virtually any gear set up to make "a" good photo. But to consistently and reliably craft very specific photos based on clients needs require higher quality and often specialized gear.
For example, try shooting a sporting event with a cell phone. No matter how talented you are, good luck making images likely to be picked up by editors. There are examples like this for most genres of photography. Gear doesn't enable or block good photos but it is a critical factor in meeting requirements.
There are two different assertions which are being conflated.
No one denies that you require certain gear to produce certain images; however, no particular piece of gear will make anyone a better artist.
Of course, they do when they assume the gear does not matter, of course, they do when they assume everyone can get by with a D500 and a 50mm lens.
Artist... One would think an artist would perform better with the right tool, a flute is not really the best fit for a drummer, etc.
Sure, people think all you need is a D500 and a 50mm to produce highly specialised images. Bullet in flight/microscopy/astrophotography/utterly bland commercial work/etc, yep, you guessed it...
More like you simply don't understand what is being said.
Ugh.
Yeah that must be it Will, or it could simply be ugh... 🙄
The fact that you believe others are as stupid as you do says more about you than it does about them.
Yeah Will we know you can fight on the keyboard, you feel better now?
Don't sweat it Paul, I would have no problem telling you what I think to your face. We are not all cowards.
One cannot miss the irony of you deciding to pick a fight with me and then becoming petulant.
Yeah Will its a harsh world when everyone not agreeing with you are "picking a fight" Carry on KBW.
Incidentally, do you produce any work that is not utterly boring? Anything that makes you feel something? I would have thought that with all that gear it should be easy.
Credit where credit is due, your work is technically perfect; but it doesn't alter the fact that there is nothing I would remember 5 minutes after looking at it.
Oh Will you really do not disappoint do you? A true little keyboard warrior! How cute!😂
Which in no way alters the truth of my above post.
I assume from the lack of response that your utterly empty commercial work is all you have. I guess your gear really does make you superior.
The truth regarding your opinion... Yeah that's something I really loose sleep over. Your masculinity? LOL yeah keep dreaming. Take care now Will!
All that gear...
I think we all have right thinking, just not in agreement how we describe:
Gear and skill goes hand in hand. As your skill level goes up, necessity of better tools becomes important. For a newbie, he must be concerned about developing his/her skill rather than buying "pro" gear.
Why? My subject matter hasn't changed, and I have no need to upgrade my gear or buy different gear.
If I had the chance to buy a $13,000 worth of gear for $94, I would be very very (!!!!) excited.
Ugh i was so sad when i read that article
I’m over it. It’s work stuff.
I get excited about a new tool in my workshop instead now. A camera is a camera. They all do the same job.
A nice new 18v tracksaw though. Oooooh, fits nicely into my workflow alongside my recent cordless router/trimmer.
Mmmmmmm, woodworking tools.
Use boring equipment, complain about using boring equipment. I love mine! :)
Awesome gear (you definitely have gear acquisition syndrome). It must be fun to shoot with those occasionally.
That's my dream... getting into 4x5, maybe in a year.
What's stopping you? Can't afford the $300 to set up?
Nope, first gotta start using my GFX-50S and improve my skills before the next gear. Have spent $50k in 5 years.
Woosh
I’ll be honest I used to be about gear, or I thought I was, I’ve only ever really owned several lenses. I did a lot of research before I bought my 6D and Zeiss primes, compared sigmas and L’s (although my uncle made me an offer I couldn’t refuse for his 50mm f/1.2 -_-) And I am so incredibly pleased with my Zeiss lenses performance in the studio.
I don’t worry about cameras and lenses much anymore. I’m buying up Canon EF-S zooms so I have a working set and Canon cuts deep discounts on them from time to time. And I find the 7D quite zippy (I use a 6D with manual primes, so I imagine anything would seem zippy laughs)
But right now I’m buying a backdrop stands, some backdrops, light stands (some good sturdy Matthews ones) and umbrellas. And the prospect of having my own studio and shooting what I want thrills me most of all.
I have been in photography for 33 years. I have have been a musician playing a trumpet for 49 years. The camera is your instrument. The more you "play" it, use it, the more you learn it's capabilities. You will be able to "play" it without having to think about the mechanics of how to use it. A great musician can make a $500 instrument sound like a $5,000 instrument. A musician who has not spent time learning their craft will make a $5,000 instrument sound like a $500 instrument. It's the same in photography. I love new photography gear like most people, but it is what's between your ears is the most important feature of your instrument. The camera is just a tool. A $5000 camera over a $500 camera can let you be more efficient with what the vision you have with a shot. But you have to have the vision and the practice time invested in your camera to get the shot. When I hear a great trumpet player performing my first thought is not, I wonder if they are playing on a Bach, a Yamaha, or a Benge trumpet, I don't wonder which brand of instrument they use. I think about all the practice time and talent it took to perform the piece. You can get into the gear trap with musical instruments and equipment just like photography. Just master the camera and equipment you have. Make that $500 camera produce shots like a $5000 camera. When you have mastered your camera invest in a better one. With trumpet playing it's about what's between your ears, muscle memory, and how you use air. With photography it's about what's between your ears, muscle memory, and how you use light.
I love this topic. In many situations, great photographers can make magical images with virtually any gear. Yet in some situations you need certain technical capability to make any usable image at all. Shooting indoor sports without a fast zoom and excellent autofocus - don't expect more than a few lucky keepers. Available light night interiors - don't bring anything smaller than an aps-c sensor with at least a 2.8 (hopefully faster) lens. The better the photographer the better the results but let's stop pretending that better tools don't also improve the results.