Is the Rokinon AF 14-24mm f/2.8 Worth the Savings?

Wide angle lenses are notoriously tricky when it comes to distortion, and finding the right balance between quality, size, and cost can be tough. The Rokinon AF 14-24mm f/2.8 might be a lens you're considering, but does it check all your boxes?

Coming to you from Craig Christoffersen with Let the Light In, this thorough video breaks down the pros and cons of the Rokinon AF 14-24mm f/2.8 lens for Sony E mount cameras. Christoffersen points out the lens' compact size and thoughtful design, highlighting the textured grips on the zoom and focus rings that allow easy operation by feel alone. However, he also flags an issue: the zoom and focus rings sit extremely close together, which can feel cramped during practical use, especially if you're shooting handheld video. Despite that tight spacing, Christoffersen appreciates the ruggedness of the lens build, specifically the firm AF/MF switch that prevents accidental toggles mid-shoot. These seemingly minor design touches make a real difference during actual photography or filming sessions.

The video covers essential optical considerations too, emphasizing the consistent f/2.8 aperture throughout the entire 14 to 24mm zoom range. Autofocus reliability is another standout, using a linear stepping motor that's fast, quiet, and effective in smoothly tracking subjects. While autofocus excels, Christoffersen does caution viewers about noticeable distortion, especially at the 14mm end of the zoom range when subjects are positioned close to the edges of the frame. For subjects farther away or at 24mm, the distortion is significantly less problematic. He also briefly mentions the lens' minimal but detectable focus breathing at wider focal lengths, something filmmakers in particular may want to consider.

Key Specs

  • Focal Length: 14 to 24mm

  • Aperture: Maximum f/2.8, Minimum f/22

  • Lens Mount: Sony E (Full Frame) 

  • Minimum Focus Distance: 7.1" (18 cm)

  • Magnification: 0.17 to 0.26x (1:3.85)

  • Optical Design: 15 Elements in 11 Groups

  • Aperture Blades: 9

  • Autofocus: Yes (Linear Stepping Motor)

  • Image Stabilization: No

  • Filter Size: 77 mm

  • Dimensions: 3.3 x 3.9" (ø 84 x L 98.6 mm)

  • Weight: 15.7 oz (445 g)

Christoffersen does raise an important consideration regarding stabilization, noting that the lens lacks built-in image stabilization. Even with standard in-camera stabilization active, he found it necessary to apply additional stabilization in post-production to achieve truly steady handheld footage. If smooth video is a priority for you, this could influence your purchasing decision, making additional stabilization methods or equipment necessary.

Overall, the video provides helpful insights into real-world usage, practical handling quirks, and the optical strengths and weaknesses of the lens. While distortion remains a clear drawback, particularly at wide focal lengths, its compact design, robust autofocus performance, and competitive price might outweigh those drawbacks for many shooters—especially considering its cost compared to premium alternatives like Sony’s G Master or Sigma equivalents. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Christoffersen.

Alex Cooke is a Cleveland-based photographer and meteorologist. He teaches music and enjoys time with horses and his rescue dogs.

Related Articles

No comments yet