Using AI Without Losing Your Soul

Fstoppers Original

A few weeks ago, I was walking through Whole Foods when I saw a piece of broccoli that, oddly enough, reminded me of a Joshua Tree. Seriously. That random grocery store moment ended up sparking an entire photo shoot on the spot, and, more importantly, a deeper reflection on how I can use tools like AI in my photography without letting them take over.

I Needed to Reclaim My Creativity

Child's hand holding a fresh broccoli floret with visible stems against a blurred indoor background.

You’re looking at the final image now. It’s stylized, surreal, and almost cinematic. But here’s the thing: it didn’t start in Photoshop or Midjourney or ChatGPT. It started in my head, with a silly little piece of broccoli and a desire to play again.

Not long before this shoot, I walked away from a toxic job where I’d been the creative director, running everything A to Z. One day, in a meeting, I heard myself say, “This place is a graveyard for creative ideas.” And I meant it. That line came straight from my gut—not once, but twice—to the shock of the CEO. Followed by, “I think my time here is done,” and my soul knew I had to go.

Beyond that experience, the truth is, I had stopped making things for fun. Every shoot was for a client. Every photo had a deadline. I love my clients, but I forgot what it felt like to photograph just because I wanted to. This project with my godson, some wand lights, and a desert pass was the first time I had fun with photography in a long time.

Testing the Concept

Before we hit the desert, I did a test run at home, lighting that same broccoli with a tiny LED light to mimic sunset colors. I asked myself: What happens if I light it blue? What if it’s purple? Can I make it feel like a mystical landscape?

That’s when AI entered the picture—not to create the image, but to support my creativity. Just like I would use Photoshop to clean up a background or enhance a sky, I used AI tools to build on top of the photo I had already composed and shot. The photo was mine. The vision was mine. The idea was born in my brain—natural intelligence.

The AI just helped me enhance it, expand the background, bring in subtle surreal elements, and create an immersive final product that matched the story in my head. I used AI to play and add to my concept, not come up with a concept. There is a difference.

Illuminated tree framed by glowing green curtains with dramatic sunset sky beyond.

Use AI, But Don’t Let It Use You

There’s a lot of noise out there right now. Photographers saying AI is “cheating,” that it’s the end of photography. Funny that I heard the same thing when digital cameras replaced film.

Here’s my take: AI can be a powerful assistant. Not the director. Not the visionary. If the original idea has soul—if it contains humanity—then using AI is no different than hiring a retoucher or using a filter. It’s just another tool.

But if the idea starts with the AI? That’s when things start to feel soulless. That’s when the final image is beautiful but empty.

Let’s Talk About It

I made this photo—and this video—for myself. But I’m sharing it because I think we need more open conversations about how AI fits into our creative lives. It doesn’t have to be black or white. You don’t have to be for or against it. You just have to lead it.

So I’m asking you: Have you used AI in your work yet? Do you think there’s a right way and a wrong way to integrate it? Does it enhance your creativity or make you feel like you’re cheating?

This should be a conversation, not a debate. Watch the video, and let me know what you think—whether you support this stance or not. I’ll be the first to admit: I’m still figuring it out. But I know that if you lead with your heart, your brain, and your ideas, AI can follow. Just like Photoshop. Just like a camera.

Let’s keep creating. Let’s keep experimenting. Let’s not let the tools outgrow the artist.

Walid Azami is a self-taught LA photographer/director who’s worked with icons like Madonna, Kanye, J.Lo, and Mariah. He directed a VOTY nominated video and shot for global brands. Walid is also the first Afghan to photograph the cover of Vanity Fair and other major magazines. He runs VBA, a free Discord community for photographers & filmmakers.

Related Articles

5 Comments

Sorry but no. I have no desire to use AI in any of my photographs and using it or not should just be a personal choice. I nor anyone else should be made to feel we are somehow being left behind for not embracing AI. All I can say is for those that want to use AI, as long as they declare they used it on their images then they can go right ahead.

I agree, be honest about the usage of it.

For every person who responds, you'll probably get a different opinion. Besides, it hardly matters what I think. After all, I told Adobe back in 2011 or so what I thought of their subscription plan, which they politely ignored, and then went on to earn a gazillion dollars despite my refusal to submit to their plan. I suspect AI will proceed no matter what, and alter everything from surgery to screenwriting. So if you are young enough to care what the future beholds, then yes, figure out how to work with it. It's becoming a pragmatic issue of survival.

But back to the story of broccoli....

I, too, seek photographic inspiration at the grocery store. But our paths seem to diverge upon coming home with our vegetables. You use a piece of broccoli to stimulate your imagination for something bigger; something more complex. You made something surreal out of a trip to the grocery store. That's great!

When I look at a piece of broccoli, I look closer. I get out the macro lens and examine all the little details. I try to extract the essence of the subject from its unique lines, patterns and shapes. If it reminds me of a tree, I want to photograph the object in a way that reminds you, the viewer, that a piece of broccoli can look like a tree. My intention often leads toward something closer to an abstract image.

I'm not personally the slightest bit interested in having AI participate or complete the image, regardless of whether the human or the machine is the director. It's important for me to feel like I'm the one, not just seeing the composition, but executing the details into a finished picture. I don't even like having anyone else print my photographs. But I certainly don't fault you or anyone else for using technology in whatever way suits your needs and desires. Nor am I totally satisfied with my results, but I place the responsibility of improving my images on my ability and skill for seeing the final composition. And whatever we focus and give our attention to, will be where our skills improve the most.... so choose your priorities wisely!

Really thoughtful response, thank you. The photos you posted are excellent! This is my favorite part because it illustrates the beauty of an artistic mind.

"You use a piece of broccoli to stimulate your imagination for something bigger; something more complex. You made something surreal out of a trip to the grocery store. That's great! When I look at a piece of broccoli, I look closer. I get out the macro lens and examine all the little details."

Both are right, none are wrong. The only WRONG is that we stop creating.

The right choice is the one solely scripted for you. The one you can put your heart and soul into and be the best at your craft that you can be. So that never again must you be in a position where you hate your job, or feel like air is getting sucked out of you because of your work. Life is too short. Make something and be proud of it. My 2¢ worth of philosophy for the day.