8K RAW Video with the Nikon D800 Made Possible with Quicklapse Technique and a Custom Intervalometer

"I'm really starting to get tired of how blurry and pixellated my 4k image looks," said no one ever. But in the never ending quest to squeeze the most resolute, highest quality image possible out of our (relatively) inexpensive cameras, Art Sanchez was able to get 8k video from a $2,000 Nikon D800.

Miguel de Olaso, Macgregor, co-founder of Sanchez-Olaso, and partner to Art, started down the path to discovering how this was possible during a trip to Iceland. People say that necesity is the mother of invention, and when Miguel's video camera system became damaged, he needed to find a way to salvage the rest of his trip by capturing the best images possible. The result was shooting high resolution still images using burst mode, and using software to fill in the gaps using frame interpolation. This was the beginning of the "Quicklapse" tehcnique, and this video was the result:

After trialing different cameras, the Nikon D800 was selected as the best system for the task of making this technique applicable, and Art had just the project in mind: an architectural highlight video as seen at the top of this article.

One of the biggest hurdles was the 100 image burst limit on the Nikon D800. They were able to bypass this limit with a little help from a custom intervalometer developed by Alex Gutierrez, motion control engineer and CEO at Mslider.

This technique requires shooting and processing an incredible amount of data. Art shared information on his blog about it:

Since the whole project was shot in raw format, the processing and conversion of the stills had to be done before the editing could start. We used Lightroom for the raw conversion. It took more than two weeks to export the 36mpx color corrected raw material to 4K. And we are not counting the time we spent dialing the right settings in Lightroom. Two straight weeks where our main computer was just exporting image files, 24/7.

Once we had image sequences we imported those into After effects, where we performed tasks such as stabilization, perspective control and of course time remapping. This process took about two more weeks. We exported the clips on either uncompressed or cineform codec video files.

You can't deny the clarity of these visuals, and the fact that they started as RAW images means the correction and coloring possibilties are almost endless. This technique didn't come without some disadvantages as though, as one might expect.

Main advantages of Quicklapse:
-High resolution and rich colour imagery: real time video with photographic quality.
-Full frame 24x36mm sensor= good in low light conditions, optimal lens coverage specially with wide angles and tilt&shift lenses.

Disadvantages of Quicklapse:
- Tedious and slow workflow derived by working with such an enormous images and raw formats not developed for video.
- A limiting factor: fast moving objects can be a problem, such as trees or water splashes.

You may have noticed that there are no people in the video- my guess that motion interpolation would make them render very oddly, just like the trees and water. Art is quick to note that this technique is really best for emulating the "architectural photography look."

I love seeing artists push the boundaries of their tools, rather than being confined by the limits of technology. It is only a matter of time before this kind of image aquisition is common in these affordable camera systems.

You can read more details about the development and implementation of this technique over at the Sanchez&Olaso blog.

[via Nikon Rumors]

Posted In: 
Log in or register to post comments

6 Comments

E Port's picture

The footage looks great. I'd take 15 bit raw grading over (in the best scenario) 10 bit video. But spending two weeks processing the footage for 1080p Vimeo? I'm curious if it was overkill.

Michael Kormos's picture

Holy sh*t, what is this place? Looks like heaven! Even if they're selling a new religion, I'm signing up. Just flat-out gar-juz!

BTW, anyone else not getting 4K through YouTube? Mine seems to top-out at 1080.

Lenn Long's picture

When is Samsung or Sony gonna come out with an 8K television? Will 4K be skipped? Oh the joys of our never-ending quest for better and better.... Will all our high res images of today, in 30 years, look like images taken in 1985?

Roman Kazmierczak's picture

In 30years we will receive images straight to our brains. Or at least we will project it on the retina in the eye.

A few people have done stuff like this before...shot "video" with burst mode....Nikon even did it back when the F5 came out....they shot video (film) at 8 or 10fps or whatever that camera would do, and then played it back as a short film...also i've seen it done as a music video as well, i think shot with a 1d4 as i recall....although neither were done for purpose of resolution....just for aesthetic and to say it could be done lol.....but i do like the final product here....the software interpolation did a great job....too bad it won't work with people and dialogue....every bit of audio would hear the camera motor driving in the background......and you'd get about 3 seconds of a take before it stopped recording. lol

Roman Kazmierczak's picture

I only need 4K display to appreciate the 4K image. Nevertheless, it is a beautiful work.