Five Ways Capture One Is Just Better

Five Ways Capture One Is Just Better

Choosing the software to suit your specific needs is not an easy decision for most. A quick search of internet forums will introduce you to zealots from all sides who will tear down anyone who doesn’t use their chosen software. It’s unhelpful at best. As someone who has played for both sides over the past few years, I’ve had a good look into both Capture One and Lightroom. Today, we’re going to look at five reasons why Capture One is simply better than Lightroom. Next week, we’ll do the opposite. 

While Capture One and Lightroom take very different approaches, they are both aiming to be your digital asset management and raw converter of choice. To that end, they both provide a suite of tools to allow you to organize your images and develop them from raw into a standard format. We’ll not be looking at specific image qualities in this discussion, because those are highly subjective and may be the sole reason you choose one piece of software over another (check out "The Complete Capture One Editing Guide with Quentin Decaillet" for a detailed look at Capture One's tools). We’ll be looking at how the software performs, handles your files, and the sorts of customization that are possible. Let’s look a little at what Capture One holds over Lightroom in those regards. 

Speed

You’ve probably heard this one before, but Capture One is just fast. File imports are much quicker than Lightroom and preview generation marginally so, increasing significantly with higher core-count CPUs. Once that’s done, however, you get to see how blazingly fast Capture One truly is. 

The processing engine of Capture One instantly responds to movements of adjustment sliders and any other changes you make. This makes post-production a smooth and enjoyable process. There is also no need to regenerate previews after each change. The Capture One previews simply adjust themselves as you make changes, so your workflow is never interrupted. 

Customization

Aside from speed, one of the things that initially drove me to try Capture One was the ability to customize my tool layout. My post-production process doesn’t rely on using all the tools all the time. So, the ability to put my most-used tools on a single tab and have them easily accessible was a huge reason I jumped into Capture One in the first place. 

With Capture One, you can take any tool and put it anywhere you like. You can place the five or six tools you use most often on a single tab and have them all expanded and ready to use. So, if your most commonly used tools are Exposure, Levels, and Color Balance, in that order, you can place them right next to each other on a single tab so you’re never hunting for the tools you need.

You can also save presets for each individual tool for settings you use often to speed up your workflow. These can even be set as defaults (on a per-camera basis) if you wish so there is never a need to apply the settings yourself. This is great for those who have, for example, default sharpening settings for multiple cameras. These can be automatically applied based on the camera at import.

Tokens and Naming

Capture One has an exceptionally robust set of “tokens” that allow you to create folders and filenames automatically at import and export. These can be anything from simple counters to any value from metadata. This is extremely powerful for exporting your finished images. Capture One can generate folders, sub-folders, file names, and even watermarks on your images using any of this data. 

While I personally don’t use a huge amount of this functionality, it does allow me to quickly export a set of photos automatically named and located for my blog, two different resolutions for my client, and a set of proofs to my phone with a single click. So, when I finish my post-production, I make one click and go ahead with some other tasks I need to get done knowing that when I come back, everything will be ready for all those purposes. 

Available for Purchase

This is a big one. Despite Adobe's record-breaking profit reports suggesting the company is not going anywhere soon, we all see the direction their software is going. New versions and cloud-based applications mean that the current version of the software you're using may cease to exist or be superseded by whatever Adobe sees as being the direction they want to go in. Thankfully, they've kept Lightroom Classic around to support those who want an offline experience so far, but who knows what the future holds. 

In contrast to this, Phase One offers a version of Capture One for purchase. This means that no matter what comes next, as long as you keep the installer around, you can keep using that software as long as you like. 

Multiple Tools for One Job

When it comes to color and exposure, Capture One offers a suite of tools for achieving your desired adjustments in the way you want. The Curve and Levels tools are both adjustable on a per-channel basis if you need to adjust color separately from exposure. On top of that, there are several dedicated color tools that allow for even finer adjustment of color and tone. 

With Capture One, much like Photoshop, you have the ability to make all of these adjustments using several different tools and have those tools on a layer. You can create dozens of layers, each with its own mask and adjustments, without slowing Capture One down at all. 

In Conclusion

So, that wraps up five of the ways I believe Capture One is simply better than Lightroom. For me, the things that really stand out are the efficiency and speed of the program, the customization capabilities within the interface, and being able to choose which tool suits your particular adjustment style better for color and exposure changes.

Are you a Capture One user? What makes it a better program for your needs? Where does it fall short? What could Phase One do to make it even better for you? 

Log in or register to post comments

37 Comments

Deleted Account's picture

2 post in 2 days telling us C1 is better for professionals or simple just better.

Phase One bunging cash into this or back to good ol' peer justification for choices?
Use what you want to use. Get over it.

Week of CaptureOne posts on fstoppers :)

Gion-Andri Derungs's picture

I'm using C1. Why? I have my reasons. But I can tell you, how much I hate such disguised payed posts! It does C1 simply no favor....

Everyone shall use, whatever he/she likes. If you interested in a product, download the trial, test it and make your own conclusion. Stop listening to nobodies in the internet, telling you, what's best for you.

Do you say its a add when it is from adobe to?

Deleted Account's picture

Damn right I do.

Stuart Carver's picture

Personally I think this site needs to stop with these click bait titles, it’s better than that.

You would gain far more credit creating an article about 5 capture one features without even a single mention of Adobe or Lightroom, keep it independent and neutral.

Deleted Account's picture

Signed up contributors aren't neutral, they're all here to put their name on something. Visibility, popularity, links to own sites, youtube, etc, etc. All about making money. Leads to duplicate posts, copy/paste articles from other sites. How on earth can a place be at all neutral when there is money to be made on view stats and ads?
This is about the last place a bother with to read up on what's going on. Sadly, gradually losing that will too.

Stuart Carver's picture

Writing a reverse story is not independent or neutral, completely missing the point.

Zach Ashcraft's picture

Jeez these "adobe sucks" / "Capture One" posts are getting old. We get it. Personally I'd love to see more energy spent creating content that helps all photographers instead of trying to get us to spend more money on things we probably don't need

Reginald Walton's picture

To the author: Could you please prove the speed part? I'm curious and was very curious about the speed of CP1 and so I bought it and I use both LR and CP1. Not seeing ANY speed advantages in CP1 (Including when tethering). So can you post a video showing the speed differences (and using the same computer and pics for editing), that would be interesting to see. In other words, show me, don't tell me b/c I'm just not experiencing all the speed when using CP1.

Black Z Eddie .'s picture

Even if he does show you, what happens then? You'll be just in denial.

There's a reason why you're always hearing about C1's speed. It just is, especially when you're editing. People are experiencing it. That's why I switched years ago.

No doubt there will always be the outliers of users who don't see (or choose to not see) any perceivable difference. Just my conjecture, looking at some of the images on your website, it doesn't look like you do a whole lot of edits. So, to you you'll probably not see a whole lot of difference in terms of speed.

Reginald Walton's picture

No, I'm in denial b/c I don't see the differences, I don't have a need to be in denial b/c I'm not partial to one or the other, I use them both (for now). And yes I do a lot of edits. Not sure what pics you're looking at on my Website b/c nealy all of my pics are edited. I don't over edit, if that's what you're looking for. And the reason I want to "see" it is for some actual evidence that it's faster - not just the word of someone who doesn't like LR or other editing programs. Like I said, I have them both and I just don't see a difference.

Black Z Eddie .'s picture

-- "And yes I do a lot of edits. Not sure what pics you're looking at on my Website b/c nealy all of my pics are edited."

A lot of edits? Really? They look SOOC and many are out of focus or totally over-exposed.

Just to be clear, I'm only poking holes at your "I do a lot edits" statement. I don't think you do that's why you don't notice a difference in speed.

Some examples from your website:

1. This is one fine:
https://www.rwaltonphotography.com/Galleries/Jordan-Runnels-2017-Grad-Pi...

However, the 2 that follow it. You can't tell me you meant to focus on the table and chairs at the back.
https://www.rwaltonphotography.com/Galleries/Jordan-Runnels-2017-Grad-Pi...
https://www.rwaltonphotography.com/Galleries/Jordan-Runnels-2017-Grad-Pi...

2. This one is fine(ish):
https://www.rwaltonphotography.com/Galleries/Jordan-Runnels-2017-Grad-Pi...

However, the 2 that follow it:
https://www.rwaltonphotography.com/Galleries/Jordan-Runnels-2017-Grad-Pi...
https://www.rwaltonphotography.com/Galleries/Jordan-Runnels-2017-Grad-Pi...

So, what you're saying is you did a lot of edits on these out of focus and over-exposed images? Yeah, no.

Your workflow seems to consist of:

1. Import
2. Export
3. Done

Lol, Look who's talking about sooc look: https://fstoppers.com/photo/430183

the rest have weird skin tones, toning, and way too much clarity and hdr applied.

Black Z Eddie .'s picture

Apparently, you don't know what SOOC means. I shouldn't be surprised since you're not a photographer. If you think you are, surely, you have something you can show us.

sorry, but my eyes don't lie. i guess your pictures SOOOCK. If these are jpegs that are exported from capture one phase one should revoke your license for making their product look bad.

Black Z Eddie .'s picture

All this bravado hiding behind a troll account. I can't help noticing you avoided showing your work, again. This is your opportunity.

Zach Ashcraft's picture

Your personal experience "years ago" really doesn't help photographers today. Thats an eternity in terms of software development. Lightroom is super snappy for me even on a machine that's not that powerful.

Black Z Eddie = Lee/Patrick?

Black Z Eddie .'s picture

Lol, dude, you have the most unintelligent comments.

You must be looking in the mirror and typing on your tethered asus eee pc again...

Black Z Eddie .'s picture

Lol, thanks for proving my point. What's next, "'Yo mama jokes"; or "I know what you are but what am I'. smh

"Yo mama" jokes would be the level at which you are trying to rise from. Your criticism of the other photographers work is at a similar level.

Black Z Eddie .'s picture

Yeah, how did I know you'd return with some adolescent comeback, "No, you. No, you." So predictable.

Once you step up in the grown up world, you'd understand the reasoning for my criticism. All you had to do was read its entirety and not get all triggered. But, then again, you being you, it'll still go over your head.

A famous philosopher once said, "I know that I know nothing". Black OneZ, a gifted SOOC philosophographer and art critic, will be known as the "I know that I know everything" kinda wise guy who is really fun at parties.

Gion-Andri Derungs's picture

Non the less, many people have problems with the speed of LR. It does not matter if it a PC or a Mac. In my case I had real performance issues with LR. On the same machine no troubles at all with C1.

Patrick Rosenbalm's picture

"There's a reason why you're always hearing about C1's speed. It just is, especially when you're editing. People are experiencing it. That's why I switched years ago"

Following a trend or got your own bias?

I think Rob Mitchell said it best; "Use what you want to use. Get over it"

Black Z Eddie .'s picture

Exactly. Practice what you preach. There's some on here that gets their tighty-whities in a bunch everytime there's an article that prefers C1 > LR.

Ted Mercede's picture

Not saying that this MAY be the problem with your speed issues, but you may need to look at the hardware side of things. If both packages are working to slow in your opinion, look at what you hardware specs are both for what your using and what the software is looking for, as well as the size of your images. Do some benchmark testing as well.

I also do video editing and was having issues, come to find out I had an SSD drive card that gave me fast read/write speeds on a burst, but on a continuously tested 5 min run, dropped horribly. Got rid of the card, all is good.

More comments