Donald Trump Creates His Own ‘Fake News’ With Altered Social Media Photos

Donald Trump Creates His Own ‘Fake News’ With Altered Social Media Photos

Donald Trump, a president who often likes to use the phrase “fake news” to describe the media, has created a fake news scandal of his own after an article in Gizmodo revealed that several photos of the president have been altered by his digital team.

The alterations in the photos revealed that the president was often slimmed down, whether at the waist or at the neck. The edits didn't end there, however. Many times, fingers were elongated as well.

The edits weren't hard to find; the original photos were posted in the public domain on the White House’s official Flickr feed. You can see one of them here compared to the original:

The edited Photo of Trump on Facebook.
The original Photo of Trump on the White House Flickr feed.

Note the slimmed down neckline and waist. The Gizmodo article has a few more examples, making it clear this isn’t an isolated incident. Some of the changes are so small it's hard to spot, so there may be more out there.

While news organizations generally prohibit their photographers from these sorts of material edits in photos, there’s technically no sort of ethical guideline prohibiting these sorts of alterations from the White House. That said, this wasn't a common practice in previous administrations, and such a breach of accepted (if unwritten) photography ethics could erode the trust of viewers looking at images coming out of the White House and the government in general.

What’s crazy about all of this is that the edits aren't even that drastic. A tuck of the jacket there, a finger elongated there. It’s hard to see why some of these edits were even made.

Do you think it’s OK for the White House to digitally “slim down” and enhance the president? Leave your thoughts in the comments below.

Log in or register to post comments


Nathan McMahon's picture

He's adorably inept and insecure.

William Howell's picture

Hey Nate, may I ask you why you have voted thumbs down so many time and rarely vote thumbs up and also do I have the majority of your negative votes? Because I have racked up 5 thumbs down just for this one article!
Edit: make that six!
Good one.

I'd guess it has to do with stating that a reality show host would make a historically significant President. Actually that's not even a wrong statement to make.

William Howell's picture

Yeah, I don’t reply to people that don’t have anything in their portfolio. Now, I’m not calling you a troll, I’m just saying...

Yes you are calling me a troll, and yes you did reply... Just calling things as they are. Why would I need to put a portfolio, I just want to read articles, and periodically comment on them. Your ability to judge someone's ability to lead a country, or even to be able to articulate what you are actually doing, has nothing to do with your skill in photography.

Edit: Now you made me look... Your photos are nice.

Ken Flanagan's picture

Everyone is to some degree I think. I don't really care anymore. I would have a beer with any president.

William Howell's picture

Oooh I had to jump on this, went straight to comments, didn’t even read the article yet! Wasim is on another Trump rant!
I think President Trump is doing an awesome job and I predict he will be remembered fondly as a historically significant President. A lot of people, and I mean a lot, don’t know just how much he has done in only two years.
It will take at least two decades to undo what he has accomplished for our nation!

Edit: Just went back and read the article, and yeah its ok to post process the image of the president. Everyone likes to look their best so why not The Donald.

Scott Wardwell's picture

Any edit to the proportions of an image where you to force one dimension at the expense of the other which give you these artifacts. Three images out of how many shot of Trump? I think we have larger issues at the moment.

William Howell's picture

Yes I do too. But it is fun, The Sweet Sweet Donald just gets under the skin of so many peeps.

16mm Camera's picture

He’s so charming isn’t he. His personality, his intellect and physique. What a “sweet sweet” man. (As you say)

Sarcasm full throttle.

He is funny dude (in a sad way) .. well at least if you dont live in US :) ..

William Howell's picture

I have made it my policy, not to reply to people who don’t have anything in their portfolio.
Now I’m calling you a troll, I just don’t won’t respond to someone that won’t take the time to put up some work.

I disagree with you. Trump is not a good president: 1.5 trillion deficit caused by wealthy tax cuts while middle earners tax cuts eroded by higher cost goods triggered by tariff wars, chaotic immigration policies and GDP loss from government shutdown, protection of for-profits on the backs on student debt, shrinking of lifespan due to climate policy and toothless EPA, justices that are more partisan that scholarly, a larger swamp in Washington, and the list goes on. Funny thing is that "limited government" conservatives are the one asking for 5.7B for a wall to nowhere when we have other bills to pay.

I appreciate your loyalty, and I respect that a population supports Trump, but many others don't buy your arguments. I voted for Ronald Reagan and Bush Sr. My Dad served 20 years in the military. I general agree to the principle of the 2nd amendment. I am not a bleeding liberal. I dislike Warren and Pelosi and many other heavy handed progressives. This President represents nothing that is American.

William Howell's picture

Thank you for not calling me bad names, that is refreshingly awesome!
Me and you most likely do truly agree on one thing, President Trump is not a good president, but we diverge in the estimate of goodnes. I’m on the far upper most reaches of the goodness scale.

Christos Dikos's picture

Tax Revenues are up so the deficit is caused by the out of control spending not the evil tax cuts. Nevertheless, although the total $ deficit # is up, Debt to GDP ratio is down because the economy is actually growing now. Unemployment numbers are as low as we've ever seen them - and across the board - Hispanic and Black unemployment at record lows. Also, the jobs being created are full time real jobs (manufacturing) vs. the previous administration where 80%+ new jobs were part time service jobs.

The previous President said what Trump has accomplished was "impossible". Something along the lines of needing a "magic wand" to create it. Well Trump has done that and more.

You can hate the man based on his method and personality or what ever other political bugaboo crawls up your backside, but the economic numbers say his plan is working very well and helping the Nation greatly.

Not to mention that all of this Economic gain was done during a period were the Fed raised interest rates 7 times and reversed their Quantitative Easing Policy. William Howell is correct that in the future, this economic revival will be recognized as a significant accomplishment.

I didn't even have to finish my dinner to unravel the double speak. First, 5.7B for a wall and George Bush's expansion of Medicare is what they call spending. Dems do it too, I get it. Tax revenue increases are barely covering the $1.5 trillion tax cut and the rate of growth needed has never been seen in American history for any sustainable time period. Trump with his EPA de-regulations and tax cut gave a short term adrenaline shot to the economy/jobs but the hangover will be severe. If anything, call me out for referencing Wall Street because its performance is irrelevant to good economic policies.

Keep in mind that pundits said the tax cuts would go back to workers, but aside from a few lip service bonuses most went back to buy back stocks or other financing tricks. I don't blame corporations; simply calling out what people said and what really happened. The sad fact is anyone can promise no taxes and no regulations and change the economy for a short period, but you eventually pay the piper, Sorry, I don't subscribe to your economic theories which went down in flames with Reagan's trickle down. Simply ask are the majority of Americans experiencing a better standard of living with less worry of catastrophic events. A low wage job is not proof.

William Howell's picture

Hey just saw my name, thanks

Eric Ventress's picture

I completely agree that he will be considered a historically significant President, and that it will take at least two decades to undo what he has done to our country.

William Howell's picture

Yeah, I’m not replying to anyone, anymore, that don't have any photographs in their portfolio. Now I’m not calling you a troll, I just don’t want to deal with someone that doesn’t post work.

Eric Ventress's picture

Well gee, now I have mixed feelings about whether I should finish setting up my account here or not.

William Howell's picture

Sorry about that, didn’t realize you were new and just getting your account going. Yesterday, before I commented on this article my profile rating for my portfolio was 2.25 stars, by the time I went to sleep my rating was 1.9. So just be aware, if you make definitive comments and stand on principle, you will trigger the snotty and hateful left-wingers.

Mike Kelley's picture

I dOn'T CoMe To FsToPpErS FoR PoLiTiCs yOu LoSt a FaN

William Howell's picture

Come on Mike Kelley, it's fun to throw some politics in some times. That’s why Wasim is one of my favorite writers on Fstoppers, he stirs the pot on occasion.
I come here for the photography AND articles. If you want photography only, then just look at the fabulously inspirational photographs the people upload, I have rated over 500 myself. As a matter of fact I have been studying your Pan-Am Clipper series, and I love them!

Edit: Hey Mike, as an aside, could you do an article for the Pan Am Flies Again series? I mean I really like the look and feel of those photographs.

Hey I found it, its from mid 2014, wonderful and timeless photographs, I thought they were new! That is saying something, there.

Wasim Ahmad's picture

Awww, I'm glad I'm one of your favorites :)

William Howell's picture

Man, you are, when I saw it was your article, I knew it would spur some good comment and some humorous comments!

Chris Sampson's picture

It is a legit photojournalism question. Altering photo records can be equated to altering any other records.

Mike Kelley's picture

Is it though? Photojournalism seems pretty cut and dry to me. Commercial photography, art photography, whatever. I think the future will judge this to be a terrible decision and anyone with two brain cells to rub together probably agrees. These photographs need to serve as historical record, not advertisements.

Alexander Lobozzo's picture

In fairness, the photo shown in this example is not photojournalism, it IS an advertisement.

Mike Stern's picture

Hey I am not sure how serious Mike Kelley is with his comment but, Wasim you use a very cheap headline for your article here and involve your political views and made it a clickbait and in result loose respect of your readers as well as trigger people like William to write his political views here for us to read.

In the other hand we can easily see your point. Gizmodo website well documented the digitally altered images without using words like creating fake news on their headline. It’s not the greatest site but you should perhaps learn. And you are not the only one in FStoppers with such headline choices, because this is not my first time pointing out this issue.

I honestly think your team should sit down and discuss the particular problem.

Wasim Ahmad's picture

What about the headline was untruthful, though?

More comments