It's an unavoidable topic in American conversations. In the photography world, it seems to pop up on the forums and Facebook groups often enough to warrant further consideration: guns. Not necessarily in the heated, political debate sense, but to ask this question: In a world where carrying a concealed weapon has become more normalized and photographers spend more time in remote and urban locations, do firearms have a place in your business?
Kellie Saunders, a wedding photographer in Birmingham, Michigan, knows a thing or two about gun safety and operating on the streets. Before becoming a full-time photographer, Saunders spent six years as a police officer in Detroit.
“Originally, I studied journalism and worked with commercial photographers and publishers prior to becoming a Detroit police officer," Saunders said. “When I decided to get married and start a family, I wanted a job that was flexible and offered stable hours. I couldn't find that in the private sector, so starting a business with my camera was a natural and easy transition.”
Saunders still does most of her work in Detroit as a photographer. But unlike her time spent in a squad car, she mostly leaves the gun at home these days.
“I am a firearms lover. Let's get that out of the way right now," she said. "I am all for private citizens having the right to carry firearms if they so desire. With that said, with a firearm comes great responsibility."
So, carrying a gun while she's out making portraits isn't in her plans.
“How can I photograph clients and be in a creative headspace while at the same time be legitimately prepared for a battle with a criminal?" Saunders asked. "If someone were to jump out of the bushes, let's say, their weapon is already out and ready. Time is of the essence, so think about it. By the time I can put my camera down and draw my weapon, either I or my clients could be hurt or killed.”
Saunders said that most Concealed Pistol License holders aren’t tactically trained, so drawing a weapon when out on an engagement session or other job might do more harm than good.
“Not everyone understands how a real life firefight could go down. I do, and that's why I choose to keep my weapon at home when I'm with clients," she said.
On the opposite side of the spectrum is a 12-year licensed concealed pistol carrier and active auxiliary police officer who is also an established wedding and event photographer in a major metropolitan area. He was granted anonymity for the sake of his business, as it might be affected by this article.
“There are lunatics everywhere. Who says giving up your stuff will protect you? That may work sometimes but not always. Sometimes, lunatics are into random violence, not just robbery,” said the photographer, who disclosed that carrying is a personal choice for him and that he doesn’t disclose it to clients.
“Responsible gun owners don't tell people they are carrying. One, many people aren't comfortable with it, so there's no point. Two, it isn't something to brag about. It is for protection against bad people,” he added.
The photographer said he began carrying on the job out of general concern for his safety while hauling gear around jobs in the city.
“I think I've been carrying around 10-12 years, not sure precisely," he said. "I was worried about crime and thought it was a good idea."
When asked for comment, National Rifle Association Spokesperson Lars Dalseide said: “Whether at home, on the job, or in the field, the NRA supports every law-abiding gun owner’s choice to safely and responsibly exercise their Second Amendment rights." He elaborated: "The right to carry was only available in a handful of states in 1991 while violent crime was at an all-time high. By 2015, more than 40 states had adopted right-to-carry laws, and the violent crime rate had dropped 51 percent. Should all the credit go to the new right-to-carry laws? No, not all. But criminals are less likely to attack targets who might be armed."
New stories of photographers being robbed or mugged aren’t unheard of, so it's no surprise that many people consider a concealed weapon as a precaution. On the other hand, statistics tend to find that guns are used far more often for killing than self-defense. But if guns aren't for you - for whatever reason - Saunders says vigilance and some streets smarts are most likely enough to keep you safe.
“I photograph in Detroit almost every week, and I love my city. I've never had a problem,” she said. “My advice is to always be aware of your surroundings. Know the areas you are working in. Don't trespass. Don't take your clients to abandoned buildings. Work in well-lit, well-traveled areas. If you see someone down the street approaching you on an 85-degree day with his hands in his pockets, wearing a thick jacket, and looking around, get in your car and leave.”
It should be noted that in many states, concealed weapons are not permitted inside of churches or synagogues, nor are they allowed in places of gathering that exceed set capacities. If you're a wedding or lifestyle photographer who carries or is considering carrying a gun, make sure to check the regulations of the state you work in first.
Where do you stand? Is having a concealed weapon with you on a shoot something you’d consider? Do you already carry? Should your clients know about it? Let us know in the comments.
Jacques, did you have a traumatic life event to make you so aggressively negative towards this subject. It's such a bad topic, but you made it a point to comment. You're not even giving it a chance. Conservatives are always bashed for being intolerant, bigoted, hateful, and angry; yet you display such similar attributes on this. There must be some reason. A lost family member?
It's such a controversial topic, with entrenched opinions on both sides, that it's almost guaranteed to devolve into a slag fest, and I don't think it's relevant to the topic of the site any more than any of the other possible topics I listed above. An article more broadly focused on the dangers that photographers face and how to stay safe would be more useful.
I see your point, and agree it quickly can turn to a 'slag fest'. I wish it weren't that way; both sides are guilty of turning ugly, but conversation is a good thing overall. If it were an article as you described and the author casually mentioned that some photographers carry a firearm, then it probably would not have gotten so much attention.
My personal opinion is that Jacques is a more intelligent person than you seem to be, this given your direct verbally aggressive reaction to his post. On a quite normal reaction on a photography site, you believe he has had a traumatic life event, he is aggressively negative, he lost a family member and as a conservative you feel always bashed for being intolerant, bigoted, hateful and angry, all things which are true and are reflected in your reaction.
Mario, much like you inadvertantly supported me the last time you opened your mouth, there's confusion in writing. 'Tone' is exceedingly difficult to convey without drawn out descriptive sentences you would find in a novel. We're already writing lengthy responses on a drawn out discussion; (*edit- let's not make it lengthier; however you are complaining about inquiries, not insults; a bit aggressive prodding perhaps, but harmless inquires no less). Sometimes adults make mistakes; something I'm increasingly convinced you are not.
This is another "nanny nanny boo boo, I got you!" from your play corner, as you pick apart my words with a microscope; something liberals resort to after running out of talking points; attack character, because your only prayer is removing credibility from my testimony to make yours appear better.
Jacques is a level headed individual, and despite my incorrect assumption, he impressively maintained restraint with a firm, consistent, and respectful response. He has gained much respect from me as well as help me learn from his actions; all from the way he conducts himself.
I imagine he sounds like Liam Neeson, and has a particular set of skills.
Yikes, so much for not becoming political
In my country, probably more than 95% of the population never handled a gun. so for my context, this post is helpless. I live in a very quiet reality compared to some other countries... I might feel unsafe and there are obviously robberies, but i never even considered that as an option. i wouldn't know what to do with and would probably feel nervous carrying it. Thank you for being a peaceful country dear Portugal !
Are robberies peaceful?
My wife, she is from a country without guns; except for criminals and cops. Your story reminds me of her's. She has lived for a majority of her life without the option, so, even when she faced a threatening situation, the idea of what-if I had a gun never crossed her mind. She thought falsely, just like many others false impression of the states, that everyone here shoots eachother; it's a gunfight to the bus stop every morning; you cut me in line, I'm going to shoot you. She learned quickly how far from the truth that is. Now given the chance to carry one for herself, her opinion has changed completely; she loves to shoot and supports civilian ownership, but she is not comfortable carrying on the street. She is quite capable of safe handling, but there is a huge responsibility that she's not ready for yet.
Many altercations are ended by simply brandishing a gun, and no shots are fired.
I was robbed twice as a kid. I still don't consider a gun. once with a knife and the second time with a needle that the guy said was infected. Was it? i sure as hell don't even want to know. I was jumped both times and held with both weapons close to my skin. Would it be wise to draw a weapon then? no, i honestly don't think so. The wise option in life is to not resist and give your watch, phone or whatever you have. is it even worth it risking your life and fighting back, even if you have one million cash in your pocket ?! I think that is the question you should ask yourself before buying or using a gun. I know my answer.
It's totally dependent on the situation. If they have the jump on you, then of course; pony up your watch, phone, or whatever; I'm not sure it's the wise option as it is the only option when you have no weapon. Different situations will lend different opportunities. I think that's insane you've been robbed that many times in your life, and here people are exclaiming how dangerous America is with guns; in 30 years I've never been robbed. The question is will they take your watch and go, or do worse things before leaving? That is often the case here, and with a weapon you are not obligated to find out; there's options. I believe there is some stark differences culturally; a thief in your country can count on the propensity of you being armed being incredibly low.
As far as the criminal element, I don't like the idea of letting them get away with things as people say "if they need it more than me", as if they deserve it. If I have an opportunity to draw, then I will; I'll keep my life and the belongings are just a formality. I am curious of your two situations how they played out; they came up on you with complete surprise? For me there are steps of escalation. I'm aware of people around, and as my comfort level drops I begin removing steps between me and my weapon. I may pull up my shirt and rest my palm on the handle, remove the safety, or grasp the weapon all together; at no time have I needed to unholster. There is also an element of showing your fangs, sometimes I carry openly on my hip. A criminal does not want a fight as much as you do, and even if he has a gun as well, he will likely move on to a softer target. There's also a way you carry yourself; people will avoid you. Perhaps robbery is super-common in Portugal. I'm beginning to feel safer here.
i agree with a few things you said, disagree with others. i'm 33, was robbed at 8 with the knife (yeah back then kids used to play in the streets, there where no ipads thank god!) and at 14 waiting for the bus to go to school with the needle. pretty scary for a young kid.
i'm not here to make any foolish comparisons on which country is safer. This is not a "my penis is bigger than yours" topic for obvious cultural and logic reasons. All i'm saying is, that even with the 2 dodgy situations when i was young, i still don't consider carrying a gun in any situation, nor does the majority of the population in my country. Once again, cultural reasons.
obviously after some age, experience a beard and height on my shoulders, i've not been in any more robbery situations, but one day, who knows... shit happens to all of us.
the last crime statistics i found about Portugal report to 2012.
In 2012, Portugal had a murder rate of 1.2 per 100,000 population.
In the same year of 2012, the US had a murder rate of 2859 per 100,000 population.
i could not find robbery statistics but this one scared me quite a lot. Again, there is no history of guns in Portugal so don't even compare these statistics, i posted them out of curiosity. Makes no sense at all to compare these numbers.
cheers, stay safe and shoot with your camera !
your opinion was wise until this moment : "I'm aware of people around, and as my comfort level drops I begin removing steps between me and my weapon. I may pull up my shirt and rest my palm on the handle, remove the safety, or grasp the weapon all together; at no time have I needed to unholster. There is also an element of showing your fangs, sometimes I carry openly on my hip. A criminal does not want a fight as much as you do, and even if he has a gun as well, he will likely move on to a softer target. There's also a way you carry yourself; people will avoid you. Perhaps robbery is super-common in Portugal. I'm beginning to feel safer here.".
This was when i lost hope of a rational conversation... the day you think you know what a criminal might be thinking you are one step closer to your death. be very cautious because it doesn't matter "the way you carry yourself". Someday, people might NOT want to avoid you and that could be it.
Cultural reasons indeed; "people might NOT want to avoid you" sways me one way, and you another. I'm not conveying that I can read a criminal's mind, but just staying that much higher on my toes; admittedly very often, which can easily seam stressful and worrisome to many, but there is an air of vigilance about it that I enjoy.
I found it a pretty rational discussion; you identify differences without insulting America, few on this forum can do that.
The video does prove a point, but I guess I will always opt to choose the slim chance, over submitting; stubborn to some, American to others. I just read horror stories in the news; some I wouldn't survive, some I may; like the Ohio machete-man randomly attacking a pizzeria; frightening to imagine, but it's something I won't ever have to imagine.
Yes, it's the beard Pedro, definitely the beard. Much of my power is derived from my beard. Cheers.
the beard comment - winner!
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/b8xtNvfX73k" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
https://youtu.be/b8xtNvfX73k
this guy was able to counter ANOTHER gun along with extra thugs, who immediately flee as the cowards they are. acted like he was reaching for his wallet, so even when you don't have the first move there is still an opportunity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hi7_uiAUEa4
these guys almost didn't survive... internet videos, not the best way to prove a point. there are always 2 sides to a story.
Okay, so I have tried to read through most of the comments and of course there are some very strong views and thoughts on this topic. Fair enough, each to their own I suppose.
However, I can not for the life of me fathom or imagine a scenario where I would be packing my camera bag and double checking that the batteries for my flash are charged and the clip for my handgun is loaded.
Seriously. Can not. Imagine it.
Maybe I am living a bit of a naive existence here in Australia? Maybe the feeling of safety I have while out and about in my community, or travelling throughout my country has been a lie fed to us all by a very clever government (all though I doubt that's the case) but I just can't imagine living any other way.
I know about firearms. I have done 20+ years service so yeah... I know.
Still, I can't help feel frightened for those of you living in places where the 'right' to bear arms is given precedence over common sense. More to the point, I feel sad that you can't walk the streets without the need to carry your guns to feel safe.
I just can't imagine how that would feel.
It feels great. I can't imagine what it's like to condescend on another culture's ideals. Well I do, I feel pity, but have never sought out forums to preemptively deliver that message; it's always situations like this where we're all doing fine, and then an article like this emerges along with the entire European union badgering us about how wrong, barbaric, and idiotic we are.
Do you have neighborhoods you avoid, because you don't feel safe there? Or a few streets that you detour from during particular times of the evening? I'm sure you do just as everyone does. However crime is not restricted to one side of the tracks, and can strike randomly. It's for that one in a million chance...that's all. Is it sad that if that number comes up in my life, that I have a better chance at coming home to my family? They wouldn't find that very sad.
Do you know what's scary, eating pizza with your family out on the town, when a man bursts in the door with a machete and begins hacking everyone in sight....that's not the scary part. The scary part is the idea of sitting there waiting to be chopped with no weapon. I'll never experience that fear, because I always have a gun. So you ask how that feels; it feels great.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/02/16/random-act...
Yes, of course there are parts of town I would avoid, because that's the advise we get from the officials and I choose to listen to that advise for my personal safety and that of those around me.
What I don't do is say "F**k It", strap on a firearm and stroll into those areas anyway just because I feel entitled to do so.
You seem to have been one of the most vocal advocates in this discussion for the need to carry your firearm and if that's what makes you feel safe and secure, so be it. I'm not going to rain on your parade at all. More power to you and I'm glad that you're able to have your pizza and eat it as well.
Personally (notice I said personally?) it sounds to me that you are living your life in fear of the 'what if' and I don't think that is healthy or productive.
Of course, you're entitled to do whatever it takes for you to feel safe within the purview of the laws of your land.
I'm just happy not living a life ruled by a boogieman that may or may not exisit but I do respect you choice to enterain him.
I can't take you seriously when you throw in the boogieman comment; it's an undertone that I get from all Aussies, so I guess its a timing of humor that doesn't jive here; anyway.
I believe there is a lot of misconception and false assumptions. Why would anyone walk into a seedy part of town just because they have a gun? Only an idiot vigilante would do something so foolish, and they'd find themselves in jail if something came of it; there's self defense and there's provocation. You won't fool a judge unless your grandma lives in da' hood.
There's also this obsession with FEAR and NEED TO FEEL SAFE, is it broadcasted on your radio repeatedly? You're not the first to throw that card out there, as if it was part of the transcript of public announcements prior to the gun buy back. There's nothing about it concerning fear or safety; seatbelts are for safety. It's just a mindset of preparedness.
Fear of what ifs, unhealthy, unproductive? It's as if we live in opposite dimensions of logic. How do 'what ifs' stick around when you carry a tool to eliminate such possibilities? Where is preparedness to protect oneself and others considered unhealthy? How is my weapon being on my person counterproductive? It certainly has zero effect on my daily tasks.
It's clear that is a big thing in your countrymen's eyes, but it's just a part of our lives. I don't cower in my house all weekend because I'm out of ammunition. It's another thing I grab walking out of the door; keys, wallet, knife, gun. I guess you can't understand, because you don't have any other option; your forced to live with it and block out the thought; couldn't imagine flight before airplanes.
Please cite case examples of a boogieman hurting someone. You pretend like there's no such thing as a criminal; are the roads in AU padded and painted pink and blue as well? Sounds perfect over there. If you read the article, criminals sometimes burst in restaurants with machetes. Perhaps you feel comfortable in your 20+ years experience of "so yeah" to deal with that situation, good for you. I'd prefer to drop the bastard from across the room. Common sense? Common sense is bringing a gun to a knife fight.
Hey Jordan,
There is obviously not going to be a mutual conclusion to this conversation that we both agree upon so, I think that we may just have to leave it here.
Frankly, your one-eyed view on this conversation is starting to piss me off.
I wish you and your firearms all the best.
Cheers.
Who is one-eyed here Matt? You make points, I rebut them, then you cross your arms. I'm the one who should be pissed by being condescended to and falsely assumed to be cowering in fear for my life all day. My day job is on a military base 8 hrs per day without my firearm; just as you live without one, I can too; if I was as you depict, then I'd work elsewhere. So it's a false assumption.
If you don't mind, please read my response to Pedro a few comments below, "The hypothetical knife fight", as the same question goes for you.
I am very vocal, because I've found that most who oppose do so out of ignorance; if not cultural conditioning or a life event. I was ignorant and on the other side of the fence, but learned more and began carrying.
common sense is avoiding a knife fight, not bringing a gun to it. sorry Jordan, it might just be cultural, but i see no common sense in your words where as in Matt's, i can totally relate to his opinion.
The hypothetical 'knife fight' was an unavoidable one; an unfair advantage in the victim's favor.
You mentioned the 'penis size' angle that people (not you) love to throw in, and often opponents argue that I ought to fight like a man; "stick up my dukes"; that's complete insanity; a criminal wants to trample over my basic human rights, and I need to meet him squarely? Fat chance.
Yes, I prefer to avoid ALL altercations, even verbal ones; I am forced by law to exercise restraint, avoid when possible, attempt to deescalate, and flee; "don't start none, won't be none."
I am truly trying to understand the outside perception. I say anything contrary to outside belief and am instantly 'Yosemite Sam'. While the truly touchy trigger finger lies with those outside of the U.S.; quick to judge. I mean we do in fact have laws here; the right to bear arms is not a right to kill. Many people here are comfortable with firearms, capable, and safe, but they are scared out of carrying one for the incredible responsibility on top of the intense scrutiny you will come under if you use it.
What baffles me is the dissent towards little ole' me, who lives by the law and is a careful cautious person; meanwhile there are criminals that act with complete disregard for life and the law.
none of my comments where personal to you or people from your nationality. the point here is "should photographers carry guns". My opinion - no.
I respect your opinion although i honestly don't like it (as if you care!) and i must say i'm very glad to read this from you "Yes, I prefer to avoid ALL altercations, even verbal ones; I am forced by law to exercise restraint, avoid when possible, attempt to deescalate, and flee; "don't start none, won't be none."
well said !
You haven't, and I thank you. I do care, but respectfully disagree.
Congratulations, Fstoppers: the bait has yielded clicks.
As a photo journalist in the late 1970's, I had a Ruger Security Six 357 stainless in my camera bag. At that point in my life, I was full of piss & vinegar, and thought I could take on anyone at any time. Over the years, I found my thoughts on this have mellowed. I sold off the last of my firearms back in 2009 to build another studio.
These days, I routinely have between $30k-$40k worth of gear on gigs, and feel no desire to pack heat. I have great insurance, do my best not to be put in a compromised situation, and seem to have very little issues whether here in the states or abroad.
that is an excellent point!
Was the collection that massive?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/03/2f/98/032f98e6ac0a2ed5ce7c5...
If you concealed carry you're a pathetically and irrationally frightened wuss.
Erik, please don't. You're only revealing your own shortcomings and ignorance.
This lie only brings tears of pity to my eyes. So pathetic that I have a powerful option of defense in a world ridden with evil. So irrational to be prepared for situations no one wants to imagine. Yet somehow I remain frightened.
Frightening is your negativity and lack of confidence in your own sexua identity.
My wife is pathetically and irrationally fearful of men thrice her size?
I too carry concealed whenever I shoot (my camera). I pray I never need to use it.
Not often.
What is this "sweeps week" talk about click bait!! :)
In a nutshell both sides are motivated by the same thing, fear or concern.
Many of the Anti Gun folks have a visceral fear of guns and their use and misuse. Maybe its misguided, I know a few people really are terrified of guns as if they would spring to life and shoot people. Some even say the police should be unarmed.
Many of the Pro Gun folks have a concern about theft, robbery, rape, being shot themselves, the government and other threats. Are the threats realistic? Maybe, statistically speaking probably not, but you never know.
I probably know a couple hundred people (rich, poor, country, city, various ethnics) and so far none have had to kill anyone with a gun, except in war...and a police Lt shot a guy in an elevator...
Maybe I / we have been lucky.
No one is going to change their mind because of a photo forum discussion.
Well said.
The first 'well said' that I can award on this thread. I just don't agree with your last line.
I'm as vigilant verbally as I am with my carry practices, and over my days of interacting with many I have learned a few things about anti's:
★First, they generally lack familiarity with firearms; never touched, shot, and carried; undisputedly.
★Second, they have a misconception (foreign and domestic) of American laws and sometimes reality in general.
★Last, there are 3 people at the end of a discussion: The one who continues by engaging in character attacks, one who respectfully acknowledges the mutual differences and bids adieu, and one who changes their mind upon learning facts previously ignorant of.
The final one is as uncommon as people who can swallow their pride; by that I mean they often go undetected as few are willing to come out and say, "you're right!" They're the ones that drop out of a debate at an odd time; everyone wants the last word when they are standing for what they strongly believe; they suddenly go silent as if they spontaneously combusted out of frustration. Those ones. Send a private message; no response. Hunt down their username and the bastard is busy tearing into liberals like one of Michael Vick's agitated and starved Pitbulls sent after a pack of frantic teacup Poodles with dripping cuts of raw beef cruelly dangling from their necks; God save them. Yes, at that moment you casually back out of the room in awe of what you just witnessed; a tear of joy rolls down your cheek. Even if they're just 1 out of every 100, then they'll still lead on to influence another 1 out of 100 and so on, and so on; start to factor in those who aren't commenting, and my head begins to hurt; for that I trudge on.
I enjoy shooting firearms. At the range, or in the woods. Or in a sandpit. Bring a gun on assignment? No. Definitely no. Been at this for over 30 years and have never had a problem.
I don't see the disconnect.
The officer in the story chooses not to for artistic reasons, which I can understand; she's concious of it to the point of being mentally disruptive for her. You didn't mention carrying, thus I'd assume it was not habitual so would easily not top your packing list. Conversely I'm guaranteed to have a gun if I am wearing so little as gym shorts; in other words near constantly, unless restricted by law.
That said, when I go out for a project it's just there as always; there's no extra thought involved. The ONLY time it comes to mind is if I'm getting into position for a shot and need to lay on my side or down on my belly. In that case I ignore the slight discomfort by some adaption.
Never had an issue either, but I still carry. Kind of like never being in a car crash, but I still wear my seatbelt. I believe a car crash is more likely.
Liberty and ignorance cannot coexist.
The U.S. should always remain a Republic, because I value individual freedom. Republican under Common Law, and democratic under statutory law.
Shooter of Cameras and firearms. I carry every day and It's among my every day carry. Personally speaking I am responsible for my own safety and my friends and family (and clients) when they are with me - that's how I look at it.
I'm 40 years old and have only once "presented" my firearm to a rather agitated man after asking me for some money. I told him " sorry no, I don't carry cash." He asked again to "just look in your wallet and see" two more times. each time he stepped closer. I took a step back, and said "No i will not." He starts walking aggressively towards me and now he's yelling, . . . "JUST GET YOUR WALLET AND LOOK!!" I pull my firearm and tell him "Sir, if you do not leave I'm going to shoot you!!" THEN he backs up and said "WOAH I'm not looking for trouble!!" I yell at him one more time to leave. He does. Thank God I had my everyday carry-gun. I also had my bag with my 2 VERY expensive cameras.
Now some might say that I "over-reacted."
I'm not a mind reader and I didn't know if he had robbery, assault or even murder on his mind. However, the situation was automatically defused when he had no advantage.
A soldier once told me "if you're in a fair fight, your tactics suck!!"
Sometimes I like to travel to the middle of nowhere, or off road in my Jeep. I am FAR removed from help or emergency services so my safety is essential, it's why I also carry a medic bag when I go on my little adventures. I WILL say it is vital to obey all local, state and federal laws to which i do. Everyone can live by their own rules with regards to their own safety.
Am I invincible? No
Am I Rambo? No of course not. I don't own an M-60. ^_^ But I want one.
It all comes down to legalities and personal preference. AND being self aware of your surroundings - and avoiding trouble is the best policy.
657
This article invites political commentary on the stupidy of American gun laws. In Canada, we have tough gun laws, and NO ONE carries a gun here. In fact, you would be arrested if you were caught carrying or concealing one. While I know American gun lovers like to scream about their constitutional rights to own guns, the sad truth is more people in the US die from these armaments than from car crashes, terrorists or any other type of fatality.
Honestly, I would be more worried about travelling in some major US cities (and I've been in a few) than in any of the more than 50 countries I've travelled in, and I've been in quite a few desperate places.
If you own one, leave it at home. The only shooting you should do, is with the camera in your hand.
Frederic in Montréal.
I'm in the very pro-CCW camp. As a disclaimer, I'm a part-time photographer and a full-time career LEO. I find that carrying a gun comes as naturally as throwing a cellphone in my pocket, and I'm sure not going to go out for a shoot in a less-than-safe neighborhood (while toting thousands of dollars of equipment) without also bringing my pistol. But, that's just me.
Carrying a gun does carry with it a certain amount of responsibility. But, honestly, firearms competency isn't as hard to learn as some people would suggest. Like any other technical skill, it takes some time and practice, and a steady hand helps (hmmm... that sounds like a task that most photographers could quickly master).
For those who would suggest that gun owners are filled with an irrational fear of being harmed, I would merely point out that I've met a LOT of victims of violent crime over the years, and many weren't emotionally or physically prepared for a confrontation prior to the crime being committed against them. Most people are good, some people aren't. Like it or not, that's the world we live in.
Photographer with conceal carry possibly saves his own life.
http://www.cbs46.com/story/23654471/man-nearly-shot-in-buckhead-taking-p...
Erhm no. Dear America, please whatever it is. Stop it. Regards, Australia.
Although protection against snakes, crocodiles and wild boar may be required in some northern parts of Australia. A boomerang may suffice.