How to Choose Between Canon's R1 and R5 Mark II

Canon recently released two high-end cameras, the R1 and the R5 Mark II, both packed with features that make them standouts. Choosing between them depends on what you plan to shoot and how you shoot it.

Coming to you from Gareth Evans with Park Cameras, this detailed video lays out the strengths of both the Canon EOS R1 and the R5 Mark II. The R1 is a beast when it comes to speed and durability, designed for sports, wildlife, and fast-paced action photography. It’s rugged, with a solid build that can withstand tough environments. The R1 shoots at a blazing 40 frames per second and offers a pre-capture mode that ensures you won’t miss a moment, even if you hit the shutter slightly late. This makes it ideal for capturing fast-moving subjects where timing is everything.

On the other hand, the R5 Mark II is the all-rounder, offering versatility for those who shoot a bit of everything. It has a higher-resolution sensor at 45 megapixels, providing more detail and flexibility for cropping. The R5 Mark II is also well-suited for video, capable of shooting 8K at 60 frames per second. This camera is packed with technology designed to future-proof your setup, including advanced autofocus features and compatibility with Canon’s cinema cameras, making it perfect for hybrid shooters who want both excellent photo and video performance.

The video also highlights the differences in build and ergonomics. The R1 is larger and heavier, reflecting its design for professionals who need a camera that can take a beating. The R5 Mark II, while still robust, is more compact and lighter, which can be an advantage if you’re carrying it around for long periods. Both cameras have weather-sealing, but the R1’s is superior, offering better protection in harsh conditions.

When it comes to pricing, the R1 is significantly more expensive than the R5 Mark II, which might be a deciding factor. If you need a camera that can do it all and do it well, the R5 Mark II offers incredible value. However, if you’re focused on fast-action photography and need a camera that can keep up, the R1 is the better choice. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Evans.

Alex Cooke's picture

Alex Cooke is a Cleveland-based portrait, events, and landscape photographer. He holds an M.S. in Applied Mathematics and a doctorate in Music Composition. He is also an avid equestrian.

Log in or register to post comments
3 Comments

If I was a Canon shooter, and wanted one of those two, the R5 is the clear winner, unless you're a sports photographer of course, as the R1 has been made exclusively just for you. And no one else. Not exactly what a flagship camera is supposed to be.

The R5 is not without caveat however. Recently published Photons to Photos sensor measurements have revealed that the R5 uses always-on noise reduction through the sensor's entire ISO range. As in, the ENTIRE ISO range. WTF? I would still choose the R5 over the R1 however.