Switching camera systems is one of the biggest gear decisions you can make, and the Nikon Z system has some genuinely compelling strengths alongside a few real frustrations that don't always get discussed honestly. If you're weighing a move, the specifics matter.
Coming to you from Chris Tellez, this practical video runs through more than ten things Tellez wishes he'd known before committing to Nikon after years of shooting with the system. One of the first things he flags is a video-specific limitation that's easy to overlook: no matter which Nikon Z camera you're using, video only records to one card slot. Even on a camera like the Nikon Z 9, which is a serious professional tool, you get zero redundancy for video. If you shoot weddings or any event where a failed card means lost footage, that's a real risk you need to account for. Tellez also points out a quirk with image area modes: shoot in a cropped aspect ratio like 16:9 and Nikon discards the data outside that crop. Other systems keep the full frame and just apply the crop in post, giving you room to reframe. Nikon doesn't, and that limits your flexibility after the fact.
The Z mount is another area worth understanding before you buy. Native third-party support is thinner than on Canon RF or Sony E mounts. Tamron is on board, but Sigma hasn't released full frame Z mount lenses, and Nikon is currently in a legal dispute with Viltrox, which adds uncertainty around that option. On the flip side, the Z mount's short flange distance means you can adapt almost anything, including Sony, Canon, and Leica glass, with relative ease. If you're drawn to adapted lenses or have a collection you want to keep using, that's a real advantage. Autofocus is solid but requires more dialing in than Sony or Canon. Tellez describes it as slightly finicky with face tracking when multiple subjects are in frame, though he says once you learn the system, results are consistently strong.
What Tellez is more enthusiastic about is video quality overall. The Nikon Z 6III and Nikon Z 8 are both strong hybrid options, and N-Raw footage looks excellent. Even 8-bit recording out of these cameras holds up well, which keeps file sizes manageable without sacrificing too much in post. The LCD screens and EVFs are also genuinely good, which matters more than people realize when you're showing results to clients on the spot. On weight and size, Tellez actually did the measurements and found the gap between Nikon and competing systems like Sony and Canon is smaller than the reputation suggests, especially with newer, lighter versions of Nikon's zoom lenses.
There's more in the video that Tellez covers that isn't here, including his full breakdown of the menu system, crop sensor options, and a detailed look at pricing that could shift how you think about the system's overall value. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Tellez.
4 Comments
Oh boy! Nikon native third-party support is thinner than on Canon RF ?
This is just my comment about the Nikon ZF. If that had been 36 megapixels or 46 megapixels that would be a genuine camera that I would look at. I'm sorry about 26 megapixels in 2026 is lame. It gives you no real ability to crop and then print and I think cropping sometimes in big scenes can be really useful in 26 megapixels is just bloody lame in 2026 up your game Nikon and start putting the same sensor in all of your cameras, which is what Fuji Cannon and other manufacturers do.
Comment deleted.