Environmental portraits

A few environmental portrait shots made in Kronstadt, Russia.

Which one is better?

EOS R / Sigma 85mm f/1.4

P.S. Got "1 - Snapshot" for one of these :)

5 Comments

Hi. Among the given three, Image 2. for good lighting + sharpness in composition attracting the attention as focal point. distractions could have been eliminated.
Image 3 has better pose for artistic composition upper part of face could have been equally illuminated. minus distractions.

blackzeddie avatar

I'd say #3. #1 is underexposed. #2 not sure if it's the sweater or if she has her head slightly cocked back, but, it has the appearance of having a double-chin. #3 I think is more flattering, neck wise, though, the top half of her face could have been lit a little brighter.

I've been going back and forth and back again with these. So to make this all crystal clear for you I have a different opinion - I prefer the pose in #1 but maybe cropped to cut down on the background distractions but definitely more brightness to her face. I think more even lighting and less shadow on the top of her face in #2 and #3 would improve those images.

More Posts in: Environmental Portraiture

Needs Work!

I see these comments on many photos - BTW - those who are putting comments like "Needs Work" should elaborate to say what is needed according to them.