Stop Crowding Your Landscapes: The Power of Negative Space

You are taught early to fill the frame, pack every corner with mountains, clouds, and texture until nothing feels empty. The video above argues that if you never leave room around your subject, your landscapes can start to feel crowded, noisy and harder for viewers to read at a glance.

Coming to you from Andrea Livieri, this thoughtful video opens with Livieri admitting he once chased detail for its own sake. He explains how he believed impact came from including every interesting element in front of him, only to realize that the strongest images often come from what you leave out. He breaks down negative space as the area around your subject that lets it stand out, whether that space is a clean sky, a calm lake, or soft fog. It is not about emptiness; it is about space that does not compete for attention and instead supports the main idea. You see how this approach turns the background from clutter into a deliberate part of the story.

Livieri then walks you through the relationship between positive space and negative space, treating them as partners instead of opposites. Positive space is the subject, negative space is everything that shapes how you experience that subject, and your job is to balance the two so the story is obvious at first glance. He uses one scene in the Dolomites as an example, comparing a wide frame full of mist, trees, and atmosphere to a second frame that isolates a single tree against simpler surroundings. The first image speaks about the valley as a whole while the second leans into the character of that lone tree, and the extra breathing room gives it a kind of voice you notice immediately. Thinking this way helps you decide whether you want the landscape itself to speak or one small element within it.

The video also shows how negative space still works when you have more than one subject. Livieri describes waiting on a winter morning for a small cloud to reach just the right distance from a chapel so a clean gap of sky sat between them, letting that “empty” space carry as much weight as either subject. He talks about how a large field of snow, water, or sand can make a tiny shipwreck or figure feel surprisingly powerful once the textures in that space are controlled instead of random. Human figures come into the discussion too, not as the main attraction but as anchors that give scale and balance to big, open environments. You start to see that spacing, not just the subjects themselves, often decides whether your frame feels intentional or accidental.

Livieri closes with practical ways to try this the next time you are out shooting, starting with the idea of building your composition around space first instead of the subject. You look at the sky, water, or snow and ask how clean you can make that area before you even lock in what goes in the middle. From there, you work by removing distractions rather than adding elements, shifting position until everything inside the frame either supports the subject or disappears. He hints at more nuanced examples in the video, including how different balances of space change the mood of an image and how negative space can quietly become the subject itself when it dominates the frame. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Livieri.

And if you really want to dive into landscape photography, check out our latest tutorial, "Photographing the World: Japan II - Discovering Hidden Gems with Elia Locardi!

Alex Cooke is a Cleveland-based photographer and meteorologist. He teaches music and enjoys time with horses and his rescue dogs.

Related Articles

1 Comment

'Fill the frame. That's one of the first things we're taught in photography.'

Well, no, actually. Without delving too deeply into the content, it seems to be built around a false - or assumed - premise.

I was always taught never to fill the frame in landscape photography.