The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra takes a well-established platform and formula and builds upon it with a number of improvements and new features, one of the most notable being its 200-megapixel wide angle camera. This excellent video review takes a look at the new phone and the sort of performance and image quality you can expect from it in practice.
Coming to you from Marques Brownlee, this great video review takes a look at the new Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra smartphone. Sitting at the top of the company's line, the Galaxy S23 Ultra comes with just about every feature you could imagine, including:
- 3,088 by 1,440 pixel, 6.8-inch OLED screen featuring a variable refresh rate of 1 to 120 Hz
- Large 5,000 mAh battery
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor
- 8 or 12 GB of RAM depending on model
- 256 GB, 512 GB, or 1 TB of storage
- USB-C connection
- Four rear cameras:
- 12-megapixel, f/2.2 ultrawide
- 200-megapixel, f/1.7 wide
- 10-megapixel, f/4.9 telephoto
- 10-megapixel, f/2.4 supertelephoto
- 12-megapixel f/2.2 front camera
- Optical image stabilization
- Laser autofocus
- 8K video at up to 30 fps, 4K video at 60 fps, and 1080p video at up to 960 fps
- Ultrasonic fingerprint sensor
- Face recognition
- IP68 certification
- Wireless charging
- S Pen support
- 5G mmWave, sub-6 GHz, LTE, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2 wireless connections
All in all, the Galaxy 23 Ultra looks mightily impressive. Check out the video above for Brownlee's full thoughts.
Via: Marques Brownlee
Related Articles
5 Comments
Another non-original with a totally sponsored vibe, from formerly indie Fstoppers. Worse, amplifying a corporate shill. In comparison, almost everybody else has been pointing out that the S23 Ultra is in many cases actually worse than the S22 Ultra in the camera department, and hardly an improvement.
How is this sponsored if we just shared a video from another youtuber? Your favorite "Indie" Fstoppers started from day one featuring other youtube videos on our channel.
Well, you hid/censored my comment from public view anyway to protect your declining brand, so no diff.
I repeat, the camera is actually worse in critical categories, and hardly better, as universally proven by reviewers independent from the corporate shills for Samsung. Your masquerading of a sponsored video embed as a new blog post of your own, is pretty damn cynical and NoFilmSchool-y. You're following in their footsteps, downward marching...
I really really want to try one of these other non iphones because I hear so many people talk about the camera capability. I get so frustrated with my iPhone and Apple products but it really is like a drug. It's not so much that I am a fan boy of Apple because I'm definitely not (I use Windows still) but the addiction with the iphone is so strong I can't imagine switching systems. Apple TV and Facetime make it so hard to ever want to think about leaving. That being said, this S23 looks pretty slick. Maybe one day I'll at least buy one and try it for the return period.
It does not matter how good the camera is on an Android phone If the Android App Developed will make the Quality OF The Photo worse if you Compare it to iPhone. But know one seems to TEST this in their reviews. :/