Photographer Brandon Woelfel Shares the Shooting and Editing Secrets That Gained Him 3 Million Followers

Photographer Brandon Woelfel Shares the Shooting and Editing Secrets That Gained Him 3 Million Followers

With over 3 million Instagram followers, and a client base that includes Apple and Nikon, Brandon Woelfel is doing something right. Now, in his new Skillshare Original online class, the photographer is sharing not only the secrets behind his shooting and editing techniques, but how he achieved his successes.

Photographic Style

Based out of Long Island, NY, Woelfel never intended to be a photographer. Starting out in college, he was studying computer graphics. In the years since, he has carved out a thriving career, cementing himself as one of the most widely-known photographers in the industry, due largely to his recognizable signature style. Openly shooting with both his digital camera and iPhone, he has paid attention to what his followers do and don’t respond to, and attributes much of his success to opening conversations with his audience, and actively engaging with their opinions.

Woelfel says that consistency is key to furthering your social media presence. Regardless of whether your shooting style is niche or more generalized, he says that being thorough in the work you’re putting out is essential. As for his own work, he prefers having a notable aesthetic. It stems from his time at school, where he was urged to pick a niche and stick with it. Woelfel almost exclusively shoots either at golden hour, or at night time. Conveniently, the two “fall into each other,” but give completely different effects. A standard shoot for Woelfel would involve himself and his model taking several outfits, first shooting during golden hour before changing it up and shooting in the dark. He tells Fstoppers: “It’s all about getting as much as you can out of a shoot and having variety. [The photos] look so different, but were shot within the same hour."

Having a certain aesthetic can get you recognized, instead of blending into the crowd.

Woelfel shoots at night in the Skillshare Original videos.

Amongst the millions whose eye Woelfel’s work has caught is Skillshare. An online learning community for creators with more than 8 million members around the globe, the company has been collaborating with him for the past 18 months. As someone who used to search online for tutorials as a way to learn, Woelfel aims for his class to be a resource that his followers – many of whom are beginners who would benefit from being able to learn from home – can gain insight from. Utilising the Instagram Stories’ ‘Swipe Up’ feature to plug their previous collaborations, Woelfel says many of his followers eventually signed up to the site, and wanted to see lessons from him. Now, the inevitable has occurred, and the two have partnered on his first Skillshare Original. “We finally came together and did a whole process start to finish of what I do.”

Sharing Secrets

As a photographer myself that has spent the best part of a decade crafting (and constantly changing) his own post-processing workflow, I was keen to know if Woelfel felt apprehensive, even vulnerable, about sharing his editing secrets. After all, posting before and after shots is a bold move that opens oneself up to public criticism. Making public the intricate processes used to transform a photo from its original state leaves any photographer in a vulnerable position. Although he admits the idea of revealing his Photoshop workflow was definitely weird at first, Woelfel is no stranger to speaking openly on how we does what he does. A keen YouTuber, it’s not unusual to find him offering insight to the behind-the-scenes goings on of his shoots, and he often provides links for his followers to purchase the same lighting or props that he himself uses. However, by his own admission, YouTube didn’t feel like the right platform to share editing workflows. Thus, his Skillshare class was born.

I’ve always wanted people to get an insight into how I edit, but I wanted to do it the right way.

Woelfel shares his editing techniques in the Skillshare Original videos.

I asked him straight up: What would be your response to someone who said you rely too much on editing, or that it’s “wrong” to purposely underexpose your images, even if you’re doing so tactically? Woelfel says it all comes back to how he learnt his craft. In school, the approach was to shoot one certain thing “with the intention to later composite that into a final image,” a process he says is now engrained into him. He makes the valid point that he is always open about the fact his images have been edited, and his willingness to post before and after sets is proof of that. He makes the comparison of how a movie is perceived differently by each member of its audience, and can be enjoyed despite the use of CGI or green screen. After all, it’s still enjoyable even if it isn’t true to real life. And the same stands for photography.

Everyone’s not the same as you so you can’t attack someone for, you know, going about [editing a photo] in a way that you wouldn’t have.

Having Personality

As well as shooting and editing tips, viewers of the Skillshare class will also learn how to build their following. An imperative part of appealing to your audience falls on writing an engaging caption. So just how important is it to establish an identity, and a personality that your viewers can relate to? As a photographer, should our work speak for itself, or should those that take the time to follow our photos also know what we look like, and a bit about ourselves? It’s crucial, if you ask Woelfel. Makes sense, given that such a huge part of his brand is the open forum that his Instagram has become. He says that in a world saturated with photography and social media, where your nearest competitor is “just a scroll away,” it’s imperative to have a face.

Many of his posts invite his audience to share their opinion. “Which edit do you prefer!?” reads one caption; “If you were to edit this image, would you leave the light fixtures in?” says another. Woelfel is no stranger to posting different edits of the same picture, too – a move some photographers would consider terrifying. These different edits often showcase one of his most utilized tools: selective color.


Captions are a great way of getting people engaged. Of course I was apprehensive [to invite opinion] at first, as you don’t want someone to not like your edit, but I’ve gotten used to comments like ‘I preferred the before.’ It’s a way of opening up a conversation.

Behind-the-Scenes

Similarly, one aspect of his feed that Woelfel’s followers have grown accustomed to is his willingness to share behind-the-scenes content. With the world of BTS stills and footage very much a phenomenon in its own right, Woelfel quite frequently has someone with him on set to capture everything going on. He prefers to keep the crew numbers down, favoring just himself, the subject, and the behind-the-scenes shooter present. “People enjoy seeing the behind-the-scenes content just as much as the final picture itself,” he laughs. Sharing such an insight also helps with audience engagement. After all, many of his followers are surprised to learn that a number of his best-received images on Instagram were shot in either his or the model’s bedroom.

Woelfel reveals some of his DIY techniques for achieving great images in his Skillshare Original videos.

Through a camera you only see one frame, and you never know what was put into creating that image. [Behind-the-scenes content] gets people inspired and shows them that anyone can go about doing this.

So, how exactly does acquiring three million followers change the way you shoot, and what you choose to share? Naturally, it makes you more conscious of what you produce, and Woelfel openly admits that, to some extent, the comments people leave on his Instagram have inspired him to go down certain routes. “I want to shoot for myself, but I also think about what people like and how they might perceive it. It’s a battle between the two,” he explains. Scrolling through his feed, he says he can spot his development, but that his work has always stayed within his own style guidelines.

Brandon Woelfel’s Skillshare class covers everything from shoot prep and the best equipment and settings to use, to demonstrations on his own post-processing techniques, and how best to share content to Instagram in order to boost your following. He joins other photography influencers on the platform including Justin Bridges, Marte Marie Forsberg, and Chris Burkard. Watch it here

The first 100 Fstoppers readers who sign up to Skillshare using this link will get two months free membership.

See more of Brandon’s work at his website, Twitter, or his Instagram.

Jack Alexander's picture

A 28-year-old self-taught photographer, Jack Alexander specialises in intimate portraits with musicians, actors, and models.

Log in or register to post comments
76 Comments
Previous comments

Or is it just the he lives in NY? :)

I don’t agree with that. It isn’t like Brandon is shooting only supermodels. Most of his subjects are friends and amateur models.

The thing is, fans of famous models couldn’t care less about the photographer and thus they aren’t really your target audience. I have been blessed with the opportunity to shoot reasonably high profile people in the past and even when they are nice enough to craft a really great shoutout about how happy they were with the photography I rarely saw any meaningful growth in audience.

If anything, other models I have shot experience an up tick when I shoot someone high profile because that model’s fans visit my feed, then find other models who they are interested in following.

I don’t have Brandon’s demographic data but if I had to guess, his following is made up of people who appreciate creative image making and photographers who want to learn about Brandon’s style.

-Photography Website article:
“Look at this red ball”.

-Photography Website comments:
“F**k that red ball!”

-Replies to comments about red ball:
“You’re opinions about the red ball are wrong.

I call this style "photography bro" and it's kind of cookie cutter after you see enough of it on IG

Kudos to him for making it work, but I’m not seeing anything “unique” or new here. If I log into Instagram or Dayflash, I could find photos that look exactly like this in minutes, if not seconds. That’s not inherently bad, but it seems to go against his claims of “standing out”.

Either way, he’s definitely doing something right, since he’s so successful, so all the power to him.

“Fstoppers original”

Literally says sponsored right next to it.

Branding Waffle is a talentless hack. He’s been shooting live view ISO 6400 poorly exposed twinkle light pretty girls with big glasses and then adding a split tone, raised blacks, and frequency separation since the early D750 days and hasn’t evolved or picked up lighting, exposure triangle, subject direction, or framing skills since then.
He has forced faux awkwardness down to a science though. Self loathing teenagers love that shit, 3 million apparently.
I wonder what being an Instagram photographer pays? Maybe he has a coffee table book with an ironic title and lots of negative space around 1024x1024 insta posts.

Recap: drop highlights, raise shadows, use PS for composites, buy followers on IG, rinse, repeat. Every third wash, pay for ad placements.

Another day, another worthless "article" by Jack Alexander.
When will Fstoppers add a feature where we can blacklist certain editors so that their articles don't show up on our front page?

My biggest issue is he seems to only photograph women of the same exact body type. It seems more like what hes sexually drawn to than art.

I'd love to understand how you came to that conclusion. How are you so sure he's straight?

His work.

It seems like you're making pretty big assumptions if you're certain of someones sexuality based on who they takes pictures of...

Oh, thats right. I used the word certain instead of it seems.

Then what's the point in calling it out? Honestly, his work is no more sexual than your own. I don't even like his taste in photography but at least I'm not making assumptions about his motives.

IF you want to get into semantics, you confirmed that you're "sure" he's straight by responding that "His work" is what makes you sure.

Sure - confident in what one thinks or knows; having no doubt that one is right...

Its odd that you are so upset for him.

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Interesting comment, Teresa. Could you describe that type, please?

Just google his portfolio.

I'm curious, why is this an issue, that he only photographs women of a certain type? If that's even the case.

Because he has the ability to have access to wider variety of models who would probably be thrilled for a chance. I dont understand why he wouldnt want to eventually want to expand and do such. He has a huge platform, and yet he actively picks the same physical body types to post on his portfolio or social medias. If I was a plus size model, or even tattooed, id asume hed never want to work with me.

That's still not an issue. If someone prefers to shoot senior portraits and they like it, would you have an issue if they didn't want to photograph full family portraits or baby portraits? You're making this an issue when it isn't.

This is a website for disccusing work. I shared my opinion.
Also, I like how you did not even notice that you proved my point.

"If someone prefers to shoot senior portraits and they like it, would you have an issue if they didn't want to photograph full family portraits or baby portraits?"

So are you saying he doesnt have to shoot a variety women, he can stick to what he finds attractive because he "prefers it". How is that not what he sexually "prefers" vs portraits of women.

You're missing the point. You arbitrarily put "sexuality" in to this discussion without even knowing anything about the photographer outside of his images.

How do you know his "sexual" preference is that type of woman, or even women in general? You don't, but you went ahead and made that assumption to create conflict.

You are also putting words in my dialogue that never appeared. I never said the word "attractive" - I said prefers. Maybe it's a comfort zone, maybe it's experience based.

Who are you to automatically assume it's based on sexual preference?

How do you know his choice isn't based on comfort zone, familiarity, experience, or desire for consistency in his portfolio? Not based on sexuality. Maybe one of those women is his sister or best friend?

"So are you saying he doesnt have to shoot a variety women, he can stick to what he finds attractive because he "prefers it". How is that not what he sexually "prefers" vs portraits of women."

You're making a giant leap if you assume it's based on sexual attraction. He might be gay...

There might be a chance you're projecting your own insecurities.

I made my critique on a website made for just that. Id say the reactions to it show projecting insecurities. Its also, no giant leap at all dude. But you should chill. I only said sexually attracted to, you reacted as though I called rape. You over reacted greatly. Which is werid.

At least you're pretty good at mental gymnastics.