Lightroom or Capture One Pro, Which Raw Processor is Best?

Lightroom or Capture One Pro, Which Raw Processor is Best?

When it comes to raw converters and photo library managers, our choice of products has recently become more limited with the demise of Apple’s Aperture. My impression in the past was that one’s choice is largely based on features and ease of use with little difference in image quality between them. That opinion was quickly changed when I started digging into Phase One’s Capture One Pro 7.

For the majority of my work I avoided shooting tethered due to the pervasive connection issues that plagued Lightroom - my go-to raw processor for the last few years. A few weeks ago when while filming a new fashion, beauty and portraiture course for PRO EDU, I was forced to shoot tethered and decided to do so with Capture One. While I’ve had Capture One installed for a few months now, my initial impressions weren’t positive and so it sat idle on my computer. After completing the three days of shooting I began inspecting the images and while pulling them into Photoshop, I couldn’t help but notice that the quality felt better than what I’m accustomed to. I initially suspected that this might be due to the expensive Broncolor lights and parabolics that we used throughout the shoot, but to be sure I decided to pull my images into Lightroom for a comparison. It immediately became apparent that the quality upgrade I was seeing was the result of Capture One’s raw processing engine and little else. This was enough to encourage me to forge ahead with Capture One and further explore its options. After spending a fair amount of time with it, I thought I’d share some findings to help you make the right choice for the sort of work you do.

Image Quality

I’ve heard people going on about the improved image quality and tones out of Capture One (C1) for some time now, but always felt that these were overblown claims which varied by photographic genre, or were reserved for owners of the expensive Phase One Medium Format cameras. A raw file is a raw file I thought. When I first got my copy of C1 a few months back, I decided to put this claim to the test and loaded in some images from a recent beauty shoot. My excitement quickly turned to disappointed as the images looked no better, and in fact worse once I began to push the exposure and highlight recovery sliders. My more recent experience made me quickly realize the error I made in my first test. Rather than loading in the native manufacturers raw file, I loaded in a DNG file that was already converted with Adobe DNG converter. I have since asked the folks at Phase One about this and they have confirmed that it's best not to use DNG files with C1. Working with the original NEF (Nikon’s native raw format), the images felt crisper, cleaner and not as washed out as they do in Lightroom (see comparisons below). Although the images were sharper out of the gate, the sharpness wasn’t harsh and didn’t display any artifacting. One could argue that through a series of adjustments and filters you could achieve the same result as what C1 offers out of the gate, but I still feel as though the image is cleaner from the start and the work is done for you. Another area where C1 shines is the reproduction of tones. They appear more natural and representative of the original scene compared to Lightroom or Adobe Camera Raw. Studying the images between the two converters creates the impression that you’ve gotten an upgrade on your camera gear without shelling out thousands of dollars.

Straight out of camera comparison, no raw adjustments

Close-up straight out of camera comparison

The Interface

Although the interface felt unintuitive and foreign at first, it quickly became logical and well thought out. The key to adopting it was to stop thinking in Lightroom terms and treating it as a new product. The panels are organized in a logical order and can be customized to a large extent. Not only can you enable various sections (or tabs), but you can also tailor the individual tools within those tabs. This is helpful as you can save various workspaces for specific tasks or job types. For example, I can have one workspace for tethered capture which is kept clean and simple, and a more advanced workspace for my editing stage. As you become more familiar with the interface it becomes clear that it was designed with the professional in mind, hence its level of sophistication and initial feature shock.

The more complex yet customizable interface of Capture One

The less intimidating interface of Adobe Lightroom

Library Management

My initial foray into managing my image library with C1 was met with a lot of curse words. The process was different to what I was accustomed to with Lightroom and so I immediately chalked it up to being worse. As I explored it a bit more and began using it on a more day-to-day basis, the design began to make more sense. While Lightroom is a collections based system, C1 offers the option of both collections (catalogs) and sessions. Sessions differ from collections in that they are more portable and transactional. A session is a organized into a session folder containing various sub-folders such as Captures, Selects, Output and Trash. Furthermore, each session contains a session file that can load the session contents into C1 regardless of where the session is located. For client work this sort of structure makes good sense as it allows me to shoot tethered to one drive, then copy to my main drive once I’m back the office and easily be able to open it without re-importing or re-mapping anything. Furthermore, the sub-folders help to organize the files outside of C1 for easy access directly out of the file system. In my case, the Output folder contains all the PSD files so I can quickly get to the completed files without searching for them in a large collection.

Capture One new session creation


Culling images involves a great deal of time and it’s a process that we’ve all developed our own personal workflow for. While C1 is a star performer in many respects, this is the one area where it falls a bit short for me. My process in Lightroom was to go through each look and assign a star rating of 1-4. I would then grab all 4 star rated images and enter the survey view where I would compare similar poses, expressions, etc. and eliminate options until I get down to one or two final candidates. While C1 has a star and color rating system, the whole process is just a bit more cumbersome. In full screen mode, the left and right keys don’t cycle through images unless the image bar at the bottom is displayed and there is no survey style view. There are ways to simulate a survey view but it still doesn’t feel as smooth and polished as it is in Lightroom. That being said, C1 also offers a few helpful tools like the focus mask and loupe inspector for quick focus checking which are great when shooting shallow DOF images. C1’s session based file system is also useful as selects can be placed into the ‘Selects’ folder, again making for easier organization down the road. While I still give Lightroom a slight edge with respect to culling, I’m sure that over time I’ll be able to adapt my workflow to work smoothly inside of C1.

Lightroom's handy survey mode is absent in Capture One

Raw Processing

Although the initial image quality is great, you may be wondering how C1 stacks up once we begin to play around with the various raw processing sliders. The answer in a nutshell is, very well. In the context of raw processing there isn’t a clear winner however as each application has its share of pros and cons. Both applications have similar sets of exposure, shadow/highlight and other recovery tools, but they behave in slightly different ways. In Lightroom for example, shadow and highlight sliders work in both the positive and negative directions, while C1 treats them as recovery tools only. Although this isn’t a huge problem, I liked having the ability to bring out highlights or darken blacks (which is missing completely in C1) as a finishing technique on top of my PSD file. For this reason (and because C1 doesn't support PSD's) I still use Lightroom to house my finished PSD files. In terms of efficacy and quality of the recovery and exposure sliders, both applications work equally well, albeit with C1 producing a better looking result by virtue of it’s stronger starting point.

Exposure and recovery tools in Capture One vs. Lightroom

Other Tools

In addition to the exposure, white balance and other standard raw processing adjustments, Lightroom has grown dramatically over the years to include features that were once reserved for Photoshop users. Luckily, if you decide to make the switch to C1 you won’t find yourself stepping backwards in this regard. A lot of the same options such as spot healing and localized adjustments are also available and perform well. Where C1 outshines Lightroom is in its Color Editor tool (shown below). This tool is almost an application in and of itself by allowing you to specifically target a particular color and luminosity range and make hue, saturation and luminosity adjustments on that range. Combining this with the masking tools built into C1 allows you to make drastic yet controlled changes in an intuitive manner. Both the Color Editor and and local adjustments sections have well organized layers panels that more intuitive and better organized over what is built into Lightroom. Give the nature of my work, I typically do most of my editing inside of Photoshop but the Color Editor still proves to be useful during tethered capture. Due to its flexible nature, I’m able to setup a profile that will be used throughout the shoot to give the client or other members of my team a more accurate view of what the final images will look like as they’re shot.

Capture One's brilliant color editor tool targeting skin tones

Exporting and Working with Photoshop

When it comes to getting your files out, once again there are pros and cons here. While C1 provides an extensive and customizable set of output tools via “Process Recipes”, it lacks in its compatibility with Photoshop. Although Lightroom offers customizable output presets, C1’s Process Recipes are fantastic for batching and are easier to set up and maintain. Its ease of interaction with Photoshop is limited by virtue of the fact that it doesn’t use the Adobe Raw converter. Where I would previously open my Lightroom files as Smart Objects or open up multiple virtual copies as separate layers in one file, these capabilities are absent in C1. While opening multiple images or variants (virtual copies in Lightroom speak) will hopefully one day appear as an option, Smart Objects are simply not possible. This boils down to the fact that we’re using C1 for its superior raw processor and if it had to revert to a Smart Object, we’d simply be going back to using Adobe Camera Raw. While this is somewhat of an inconvenience, it’s a price I’m willing to pay for the improved image quality that results. Once again, the file structure of Sessions traditionally places these exports into “Exports” folder of that session (although this is customizable) which makes for easy retrieval outside of C1.

Export Tools in Capture One vs. Lightroom

Choosing the Right Option

Asking which tools is better is like trying to compare a Nikon D800 and a Sony A7R. Both are similar in many ways yet fundamentally different. Neither product is right for everyone and neither one is a clear winner overall. My impression is that Capture One is a better professional or prosumer product while Lightroom’s ease of use make it more suitable for the consumer market. Capture One is designed to work the way most professionals do and its rich set of customizations reflect that. Much like in Photoshop, there are many ways to do the same thing which can make it overwhelming at first. My advice is to stick with it and not to get discouraged simply because it feels unfamiliar. I highly recommend checking out my Ultimate Guide to Getting Started with Capture One which covers everything you need to know in one free tutorial. Phase One also provides a number of topic based videos on their channel as well so it’s a great place to visit if you have questions on specific features. Click here for current deals and discounts on Capture One Pro.

Everyone's situation is a bit different so it’s up to you to weigh the pros and cons I’ve described above and decide if the product offers enough benefit for you to make up for the steeper learning curve and inability to work with Smart Objects. For me, the more I work with it the more I’ve grown to appreciate the areas where it excels and the customizability it offers. These benefits were enough to make me switch to Capture One Pro as my primary raw processing tool with Lightroom playing only a secondary role in certain select situations. Despite my initial reservations and objections, it’s superior image quality and other benefits ultimately won me over.

To connect with me, use the social media links below

Michael Woloszynowicz's picture

Michael Woloszynowicz is a fashion, beauty and portrait photographer, retoucher and instructor from Toronto

Log in or register to post comments

I started using Capture One a couple of weeks ago, and from the first image that I brought in, I saw a drastic difference in the image quality right away! The more I use it, the more I like it. I'm already changing my workflow around C1 for that.

That has pretty much been my process as well. It was a gradual appreciation for it the more I used it along with some minor workflow changes along the way.

I'd like to say that I personally have been using Capture one exclusively since 2012 and have not even thought about looking back to Lightroom. I use C1 tethered on all my shoots and it's such an integral part of my workflow now.

If you use the voucher code 'AMBROSE' at checkout, you will receive an additional 10% off, for a final price of $134.50 for Capture One Pro 7.

Thanks a lot :)

Awesome! Thanks dude!

Capture one has never got the advertisement what it deserves. And also, there is not even a single photographer who came up with presets to sell. Lightroom is overall fantastic software only my gripe is getting skin tones with Nikon was bit of challenging to me. Thats when I moved over to Capture one. I guess, Michael to produce some presets and share it the fstoppers community. I had been long waiting for some one to write review about it here.

Definitely a Capture One convert here, too! I've adapted to the workflow and in many ways, prefer it to Lightroom, especially when it comes to tethering for myself or to others as a digitech.

You pretty much covered all the reasons I love C1.

Yeah it's an absolute must for tethering! Thanks for stopping by Joe

Nice review Michael !
I am a novice in Capture one but as far as I have been working with it, C1 fits me better than Lightroom. although my catalogo is still in Lightroom. Shooting tethered in Lightroom literary sucks, it crashes a lot. On the other hand C1 have been doing a nice job so far ! It has better Raw convertions and a bit more saturated images, good and bad ! But for now I am for C1

See, I've had the exact opposite problem. Capture One constantly crashes on me. I find it buggy as hell.

hey James, i have used capture one since 2007. I currently have C1Pro6 on a MacBookPro with an SSD and 8gb RAM. I really believe that C1 is a memory eating MONSTER!! I to have had problems with it crashing tethered on my old MacBookPro with 2gb RAM with my Hassleblad/Phase P25 back. C1 has always worked perfect on my Mac Pro tower, but I have noticed that an old or cheap Firewire or USB cable can cause many problems. I am currently tethering my D800 with no problems at all(Nikon USB cable out of the box). Try a new cable and closing all programs. good luck!! chris

I may have to give it another try. It has been a couple of years, and my hardware has definitely improved since then.

I've used both. I see in your results the same thing I saw in mine. Capture one tends to give more color saturation right out of camera especially in the shadows. Other than that, I didn't see a noticeable "quality" difference.

And Capture One crashed every time I tried to shoot tethered. I've never had that problem in lightroom. I'm actually surprised to hear about people having problems with LR crashing during tethered shooting. I have literally never seen it happen with me, my colleagues, or my students.

Lightroom tethered has always been absolutely useless for me. Constantly crashing or dragging along.

I have noticed that LR does tend to lag some times. I'm not discounting everyone's experience with LR, I was just surprised by it because it seems to be the opposite of mine.

Of course it has been a couple years since I tried Capture One, and this article makes me want to check it out again.

The only time I would choose Lightroom over Capture One is when shooting products and I have to use a Color Checker Passport to maintain the most accurate colors. Unfortunately, I haven't found a workflow solution that allows me to get a Color Checker profile going in Capture One.

Anyone have a solution?

Capture One supports ICC profiles as opposed to DNG profiles that are created with a color checker and used in Lightroom. In my experience the ICC profiles can be more accurate. You'll need to create the profile with something like Color Eyes ( then load that new ICC profile into Capture One (

I'm studio and photo assistant in Paris, and 98% of capture and develop is done with capture one! That means something! Instead, for a large amount of images Lightroom is incredibly more faster than capture one!

Yeah Lightroom does have some speed advantages. I stick to using smaller sessions instead of large catalogs so it hasn't been an issue for me thus far.

yeah, it's a good solution! But for an example, develop a weeding session (I only did it once, and hope to don't do that again) using capture one looks almost impossible.. the amount of times the user needs to change the session will crash the user brain.. or not! Maybe the way that the user deals with session/collections/keywords must change! I love CO7 but the adobe library for long term use looks more user friendly! (I bought capture one last week, but It's been a long that I use it on studio!) No doubt, the best but some small improvements on that area will give I'm Flawless Victory! :D

Another reason to love Capture One. It is faster to work with, especially when zooming in and out with a high-megapixel image. It's easier and faster to work on my 36MP Sony a7R images in Capture One vs Lightroom.

This is one of many articles I've read that mentions C1 is better than Lightroom. I'm definitely intrigued. I never got into Lightroom much so it's irrelevent to me which one I dive into learning. And I haven't shot tethered so again, something else that makes no difference (my computer is a dinosaur, tethering would kill it). I will say, the dynamic range in C1 looks much better than LR, which I know can be corrected but takes more time.

Anybody started developing presets in C1?

I made the jump about two months ago. It takes a little time to adjust to it, but it's well worth it!

I stopped using LR for raw processing when I discovered C1 about a year ago. Its never once crashed on me shooting tethered, and LR is a tethering nightmare. Someone recently referred to LR as a prosumer software. When comparing the two, and looking at C1's color profile options and gamma controls, its a good point. Masking and culling in C1 is a pain however.

I think it's a Nikon-specific problem…I tried with my Nikondf and with my old 5DmarkIII Raw's and not a big different with the Canon ones. For me, the best Nikon Raw converter now is the sloooow NX-D.
Pic: (Lightroom-CaptureOne-NX-D)

Anyone use the Capture Pilot app with Capture One? That right there is enough reason to switch.

DSLR Dashboard is free and is a standalone app. You don't necessarily need Capture Pilot.

Give an Ipad with capture Pilot to your client and watch is face when he understands he can rate the images on the fly! :D (Already with the 'color grading' done!)

Yeah, nothing like color grading on a a tablet. I'm sure the option to have a client grade an image is handy however. It does however assume you want to own an iPad.

Capture One applies pre-set color grading and effects (that you set up) for a session or series of shots. There are then displayed on the iPad where the client can rate them. They do not do any grading or work on the image past making selects.

Replied the wrong person and I can only edit the post and not delete it!


Capture Pilot it's an App that let's you receive on the Ipad the Images that are being captured on the capture station. The Ipad is just used to monitor and rate what's happening, and the grading is being done by the Digitech!

Imagine the workflow if your stylist got one, the client another, the DA another, and there's no crowd between you and your digital assistant.

Rental studio's have them, I don't need to buy one! :D

DSLR Dashboard is cool but it isn't really the same thing at all and they both have different purposes.

I am really intrigued, I once tried C1 but the interface was foreign for me, maybe because I am so used to Lightroom.
I think I should follow your advice and forget Lightroom terms, and give C1 another try.
What about presets in C1 ?! I've created so many presets with Lightroom that made everything very quick for me? That's why its very difficult for me to leave Lightroom now. Is this something doable in C1?

I'm using both Lightroom and CaptureOne. I prefer the quality and "style" I get out of C1 which is why I tend to use it more and more. Though, I outsource my wedding editing and I haven't been able to find a lab that would use C1 to edit my pictures. So I still use Lightroom for my weddings and C1 for the rest!

great article

Is there a whole lot of difference in Capture one 6 and 7?
The reason I ask is that I already own 6 and have been meaning to give it a go instead of LR5.
But if 6 is now out of date then I wont bother.

By the way, pull in a photo with burnt out highlights and see which one recovers more detail. i think that is the true test of which Raw processor (LR, CO, ACR etc) is the best. I watched a demonstration of various RAW processors which showed the real key difference behind them. Aperture had a lot more detail in those highlights.

Very interesting read. Thank you. I shall do a test when I get home.

I'm a Canon shooter who never had issues with LR tether (except for being slow, oh so very slow--although I tend to shoot a lot then break and review rather than review each single shot, thus not huge issue). From day one, I never used the stock Adobe profile for import, but rather one designed for my Canon 1D camera. While I do see some very subtle difference, it is nowhere near as noticeable as the examples in the well written article above. Thus, I wonder how much of the tonal difference is related to proper profiles?

As an Adobe CC user, I VERY MUCH want them to have serious competition and right now it seems the only one close is Capture One. If there is strong competitive market, then the user wins. Where there is no competition software lags and we all lose. Thus, while I'm not making a change now, I'm rooting for C1 to be very successful.

"My impression is that Capture One is a better professional or prosumer product while Lightroom’s ease of use make it more suitable for the consumer market." That may be one of the outright dumbest statements ever made. Yep, to be "professional" the SW MUST be difficult to use. Uh, no. LR was developed with the direct input of photographers so that it would intuitive. Is it perfect? no, definitely not. But to say that it is designed for consumers is just laughable.

Comparing the "default" settings of raw converters is like comparing cameras based on how the images look at the back of the camera...

Although I like a lot of things about C1, so far what I get out of LR5 from my Nikons looks better right out of the box. For tethering C1 is a no-brainer, but I recently discovered DSLR Dashboard, so that's a nice option if I want it. For me it's six of one, half a dozen of the other with both these apps. The lack of sophisticated masking is my biggest gripe about both of them.

I use C1 when I am shoot tethered which is about 75% of the time but I always import into Lightroom for my raw adjustments.. I have had an issue with C1 when I will make pretty heavy raw adjustments and I process out an srgb jpg it is not exactly what I see in the program (color and contrast will be off).. With lightroom I have never had this issue. And it's not on every image, it just seems to be when I'm trying to stylize.. Anyone have any insight into this or had this issue too?

I've been using C1 express for many months now, the upgrade price is stuck at 99eur and closely watched it. I couldn't sworn it's been like that for awhile now, the upgrade price is pretty much the same =/ I wonder if I'm seeing things.

Very cool article, I discovered CaptureOne 48hrs ago, and fell in love with it, the details level is simply amazing compared to LR, I've used it on a 24-70 f/2.8 Tamron and felt like I've used a macro lense !

I own both. I really love C1 BUT.... the windows version is way too buggy: catalog function didn't work and also the number of picture inside a catalog or a session vary from time to time, even withouth touching them... The Mac version is instead almost perfect.
Not without pain I'm back to lighroom (now a creative cloud subscriber)

C1 6/7 pro for capture - PS post production - LR output to clients. I have been using this workflow for the last couple of years and its good for me. Certain aspects are missing from C1 and the colour dropper controll is harder to assimilate que LR but the results are pretty stunning. Being able to output a perfectly clean 80cm x 120 cm image at 350 dpi from a d800 raw is not something i want to give up as i need to work at this size for a lot of my clients. Its quirky but a solid worktool for pros.

I have worked for large commercial studios for well over 10 years now and the biggest question I got from clients and new hires was "why dont you guys use lightroom/ aperture/ camera raw." Im going to just start posting this link to them. Capture one is the standard as far as im concerned. Its always been better if not the most popular or least expensive. If youre a die hard fan of lightroom and dont want to switch, youre doing yourself a disservice. Get the free trial, sit down with it and really learn it. You might be surprised.

More comments