Is This the Best Lightroom Plugin?

A few months ago, I started processing all my raw photos with a new Lightroom plugin. It led to a significant increase in image quality, as I show in this article.

Imagine buying a new camera with more than three stops of improvement in low-light performance. In addition, replace your lenses with prime ones. That would be quite an investment, right? I did that switch for just $119. How is this possible, you might ask? It wasn't the literal switch I described above. I achieved the equivalent by installing DxO PureRAW4.

I started using AI in my photo-editing workflow when Adobe introduced its AI Noise Reduction feature in Lightroom. It was a game-changer, especially for my woodland and night photography. At first, I didn't know if I needed a plugin to take over the noise reduction from Lightroom. But, since DxO PureRAW4 does not only remove noise from images but also improves sharpness and detail, I thought I'd give it a try. For the first 14 days, you can do so for free.

DxO PureRAW4 Results

I was surprised by the results. I first used it for some photos taken at ISO 800. Not only did those look as if they'd been shot at ISO 100 afterward, but they were also a lot more detailed. I continued to push the plugin: How would it fare against Lightroom when processing a night photo shot at ISO 6400? You can see for yourself - left is Lightroom, right is DxO.

I used a strength of 100 in the Lightroom AI Noise Reduction to completely remove the noise. In DxO, a "Luminance" setting of 85 combined with a "Standard" setting for "Lens softness" was enough. The processing took roughly the same time for both versions, which on my Dell XPS 9510 is around 30 seconds.

The comparison shows a 100% crop of the upper right corner of the image. Corner areas usually show the most noise because they are inherently darker due to vignetting than the center areas. You can see that both results look perfectly clean while not compromising any detail in the stars. With DxO, I still have a bit more headroom to play with, and it seems ISO 6400 isn't the limit for my night photography anymore. The raw without any NR applied will put those results into perspective.

100% crop of upper right corner of photo taken at ISO 6400 with the Canon R5. Exposure was raised by +1 in Lightroom.

What I also love about DxO is the possibility to fine-tune the details. I typically use "Standard" as a setting for "Lens softness," and also the "Luminance" setting can stay at its default value of 40 for 90% of the photos I edit. But similarly to when I increased the noise reduction in the night photo above, I can also enhance the details for problematic images.

On a recent trip to Fuerteventura, I shot a beautiful sunrise one morning. For the final photo, I switched to the long lens for a detailed shot of the mountains rising from the clouds. I guess I was still a bit tired because after I focused, I decided to zoom in a bit more. Sure enough, the photo was soft.

Below, you see a comparison between the best I could do with Lightroom's detail sliders and DxO with its "Lens softness" set to "hard." You can see the sharpening fringes at the high-contrast edges this setting introduces. I show how simple it is to remedy in the feature video. What's remarkable is the amount of detail I suddenly have in the photo. It's as if I had set the focus properly in the first place, and I now have something to work with.

The capability to dramatically improve sharpness and noise in a photo makes PureRAW 4 the perfect extension to use on woodland images. It's also easy to combine it with focus stacking software like Helicon Focus, as it offers batch processing. Under "File - Plug-In-Extras - Process instantly with DxO PureRAW 4," you can apply your settings to several images.

This way, you can make DxO part of your raw editing workflow. Use it to transform your raw photos into DNG files. You can further optimize those in Lightroom or Capture One before feeding them into Helicon Focus. Since Helicon Focus also supports a DNG workflow, it's a natural fit between the two plugins. Because of this, it has never been easier to create photos like the one below, which involved high ISO settings for the foliage and focus stacking for depth of field.

With this software, I no longer worry about windy days when photographing in the forest or other moving elements. If necessary, ISO 1600 is now an option that gives me clean and detailed results on my Canon R5. Even ISO 3200 is no longer an obstacle. It is great because now I don't have to worry about getting a new camera. Using software like DxO PureRAW 4 has bought my Canon R5 a few more years.

And if you're wondering if a DNG conversion degrades the image quality of your raw files, I have used DNGs for 15 years and never noticed problems. I only use lossless compression and never tried the "lossy" setting.

Conclusion

While DxO delivers impressive results, I found that, same as Lightroom's AI Noise Reduction, you must be careful with Milky Way photos. You'll see artifacts around the structure of the Milky Way if you use those AI tools. You can use the preview mode of DxO to fine-tune the settings - it works much better than Lightroom's AI Noise Reduction preview. Disabling the "Lens softness" correction does the trick. It also helps to perform image averaging for such photos because it doesn't introduce artifacts.

There is another little caveat, at least on my system. PureRAW 4 crashes about 20% of the time during the processing of the photos if I use the AI-powered DeepPrime XD2. Repeating the same processing will usually work, so it's not a big deal for me. But test it on your system with the trial version first. Also, install the latest drivers to avoid problems.

You should also be aware that the results from such AI tools will vary based on the cameras and lenses you use. As they have been trained on photos taken with different camera lens combinations, some might give better results than others.

Michael Breitung's picture

Michael Breitung is a freelance landscape and travel photographer from Germany. In the past 10 years he visited close to 30 countries to build his high quality portfolio and hone his skills as a photographer. He also has a growing Youtube channel, in which he shares the behind the scenes of his travels as well as his knowledge about photo editing.

Log in or register to post comments
13 Comments

I agree. As a landscape photographer my mantra was generally "Gotta be ISO100" in order to minimise noise. DxO PureRaw has changed that for me. I know that I can shoot up to at least ISO3200 and not be worried about noise in the darks. For travel photography that's a huge benefit, since I can now shoot handheld and not always be reliant on a sturdy tripod. This example was taken in Norway from a moving bus - it's not bad!! (ISO1600, f/8, 1/5000s)

BTW - I always pre-process using the native PureRaw4 software - it's never crashed on me.

i usually use full frame cameras with prime or f2.8 zoom lenses but DXO PureRAW has been able to save family photographs taken with a Sony RX100 Mark V which otherwise would have exhibited noticeable distortion and image noise

DXO is a game changer for anyone shooting in available darkness. On my Z6 or Z9, ISO virtually doesn't matter anymore so long as my exposure is good. It makes ISO 3200 look like ISO 800, it's ridiculous how good it is.

Why by a Lightroom plug-in when you can get something like topaz photo AI which does so much more than just noise reduction and sharpening.

Plus you can use Topaz with all your tools, such as Photoshop,lightroom and all your other products. Topaz even allows me to use the plug-in manager to take my canon raw and process it down to a DNG file which automatically goes back into Lightroom.

It is one of the best products out there and they are probably on par in price without locking you in to an Adobe product.

I have Topaz but I ditched it for DXO now. For me, theres no comparison, Topaz always required manual masking afterward because of artifacts. It is good, but far from perfect. With DXO I am fine using it on RAW, thats how good it is. I only saw some artifacts on Milky ways as I wrote above.

I’ll give it a try for sure

I agree, DxO PureRAW 4 does an amazing job. I tried the program and bought it the next day. I shoot with the Micro 4/3 System so noise is a real concern. But PureRAW doesn't only remove noise, it makes the images sharper. It's almost like I got better lenses and I have very good lenses already.

I made the first image below using an Olympus 12-40mm f/2.8 lens at 40mm, f/9, ISO-200 and I was focused on about the 4th tie. The area circled in red is the area I compared in the second image. No post processing was used; these images are basically right out of the camera! Keep in mind, these images were greatly reduced by about 90% to post here.

The second image is a comparison between a 16-Bit TIFF from OM Workspace and a 16-Bit TIFF from PureRAW 4. The Workspace image is on the left and the PureRAW 4 image is on the right. You can clearly see the clarity improvement on the right, even the tree leaves are better defined.

The third image is a close-up of the rail and ties about where I focused. Again the left side is from OM Workspace and the right from PureRAW 4. The wood grain in the ties is more defined on the right. You can even feel the rust texture on the rail clips, the stones also look more real.

I hope you can see the details.

You can download a free trial of PureRAW 4 from the DxO website. Do yourself a favor and try it.

Paul

One more point, I use PureRAW 4 as a standalone tool. I import my images, then process them through PureRAW 4 to 16-Bit TIFF files. Then I import the TIFF files into Affinity Photo for editing. You can also output from PureRAW 4 to DNG files if that is your preference.

Paul

That is good to know, I will compare it side-by-side. I’m a concert photographer so most everything I do is in low light and these tools are invaluable.

And best thing, as of now they fixed the crashes with the latest Update :-)

Michael if you are seeing sharpening artifacts then why not noise reduce in DXO but sharpen and use the masking slider in LR ?

Those fringes appear in any sharpening Software. And DXO is better at extracting Details than LR as you see in the example. The Photo was very soft to begin with, though. Not a typical use case, just a rescue.

Right Michael, The photo was only sharp on the ties and rail, because I was shooting that for model railroad purposes. The rest of the image was there because it was there!