The 14-Year-Old Camera That Keeps Clicking

Fstoppers Original
Photographer shooting a woman in a red coat posing by a vintage car with open hood.

This is an appreciation for the camera equivalent of when you drive a car for a long, long time and it holds up. This is for none other than what was my original photographic workhorse, the Canon EOS 6D Mark I. 

This camera has received both praise and backlash over the years — from its autofocus system to its slower frame rate to a range of other strengths and weaknesses. When I was just getting into photography, it was slightly after the 6D was announced back in 2012.

I remember walking by a photography store, looking at the 6D and thinking, "Wow, how nice would it be to shoot with that camera?" At the time, I was learning on a Canon Rebel T5i and was starting to ask myself how I could upgrade as my work had gotten better and I felt like I had been improving and wanted to grow more. And obviously with that, I wanted the full frame goodness — this was the era of the EOS 7D Mark I and the 5D Mark III.

Canon DSLR camera with telephoto lens on dark textured surface.

I believe shortly after I picked up the 6D, the 7D Mark II was released. So it's been a while, and mirrorless wasn't really even a conversation at that point. The 6D became my workhorse. I shot everything imaginable with it — real estate, sports. It's what started my career as a fashion photographer. And if I pick it up today, I can still shoot and get a great image out of it.

But this camera doesn't owe me anything, especially as it has been over 10 years since I started shooting with it, and it's starting to show its age. A lot of the rubber is starting to come off. The mode dial has lost its top. The rubber grip is starting to fall off as well, and the rubber around the edges of the camera is all peeling away. But it still shoots. It still takes a clean image.

Close-up of a DSLR camera body showing the mode dial and grip texture with a lens visible in soft focus.

And while it doesn't have the highest ISO performance, it still manages to get the shot. In an era of so many cameras being released all the time — an almost surplus of options — I wanted to take a moment to appreciate the tools that made us and to honor how long they've lasted.

Because as photographers, we're always upgrading, always looking at the next better thing. But sometimes it's important to look at what got you to where you are. It's like when you're upgrading to a luxury car and you look back at the first car you ever bought, thinking of all the memories made in it. That's what I think about with this camera. It's also a testament to build quality, because I can't say I have babied it. Sure, I've looked after it and kept it in good working order, but it has been dropped, banged around, used in sand, snow, and rain — just about any environment you can imagine — and it's still going.

Woman in plaid shirt leaning against vintage car in autumn setting.

I haven't plugged it in to get the exact shutter count, but I imagine it would be in the six digits, given how many photos I've shot with it. And yet it still keeps going. At this point, based on what I would get if I sold it, I almost think it's better to hold on to it as a keepsake — or a glorified paperweight. Maybe frame it as a symbol of what started my photographic career.

Related Articles

30 Comments

I also own a 6D and still use it sometimes , I love that camera. I was using a 60D at the time when I got the 6D as a gift from my mother. I will never get rid of it.

I nearly upgraded from my 7D to a 6D but ended up going the Sony FF route instead. Still miss the AF from the 7D sometimes which is wild.

The AF on the 6D is very basic with one cross type AF point in the centre , but it’s ok for what I do

Last year I "down graded" from quite a high-spec Nikon mirrorless to the 6D. My motive was being fed up of looking at my subject on a little screen. I craved an OVF. Basically it was Martin Castein (check out his website and YouTube channel, his work is amazing) singing the praise of the camera that made me buy one. So, early last year I shelled out £230 for a 6D in excellent condition and four batteries. I also own a 5Diii and a 5DS R. The 6D is a great camera. It is about the size and weight of an APS-C DSLR, the battery lasts forever, the high ISO is still VERY competitive, and the DR is great for UK landscape photography. The best thing is its colour output, simply the best I have ever had. You can keep your 15 stops of DR, your mirrorless, your ultra high ISO, I would not swap anything nor sacrifice anything for the 6D's colour output.

I wish it had the AF system of the 5Diii, another stop of DR would be nice and a floppy-out screen would be useful. Don't buy one, you'll hate it!

I'm still using my Canon Powershot G16, bought in 2015. The picture quality is superb. 90% of my photos on 'automatic' as well. Lightweight and simple to use. I went from a Canon EOS 650 35mm camera to various Canon DSLR iterations, but moved to the compact when the weight of the DSLRs became a handicap. Only niggle - Canon Servicing doesn't support the G16 anymore.

I still use a Nikon D3200. I like it quite a bit. It’s from 2012 though I bought it much later. Works fine.

I nearly got a first gen 6D when they were released. An unsung hero of the more budget full frames from back in the wild west digital days!

I vaguely remember that camera, but only because it’s what sent me running and screaming to Nikon.

Nikon, btw, the camera aboard Artemis as she spins moon-ward

👍🏻

Which one is on Artemis? Talking about the Nikon D3200?

Very cool. Came a long way. Interesting to see still photos still have a place even in today's space explorations.

OK, so there's Nikon cameras on Artemis, so what! There are Hasselblad cameras actually on the moon. Does it actually mean anything?

It means that NASA thinks they are reliable and deliver the goods

If only the Shuttle was as reliable as a Nikon/Canon camera!

OMG, how many times is Fstoppers going to celebrate this dinosaur? Every few months there’s yet another article about how the 6D was the best DSLR ever, or some such. Aside from being highly debatable, it’s tiresome.

Hi Jacques, please direct all article inquiries suggestions to the contact page at the following link or reach out through the general inquiries form. https://fstoppers.com/contact Thanks for being a member!

Although phrased as a question, it was rhetorical and not an inquiry. Please, enough with the 6D obsession. Surely, there are other great oldies worthy of attention. Panasonic's GX8, for example, or Nikon's D700. Both of these broke new ground in various ways and have lots of fans who love them to this day.

Excellent idea Jacques! Love the GX8. Feel free to forward those ideas to the article suggestion section here at the contact page https://fstoppers.com/contact

The LX100 is another. But, let's not have more than one article per year about any particular golden oldie. The 6D thing is getting ridiculous.

Oh of course. The LX100 is a new one for me.

Also sold with a Leica badge, revived last year, but discontinued by Panasonic. Fabulous compact that handles like a mini ILC and has a hotshoe. Versatile and very pleasant to use. I've done event work with it.

Huh. Interesting. Just researched the LX100. Similar in form factor to the X20 Fuji but offset. Didn't realize it was essentially a repackaged D-Lux. You taught me something. Was yours the first gen or the LX100 II? I'm actually curious about them now after seeing a few samples.

"Didn't realize it was essentially a repackaged D-Lux."
You've got that backwards. Panasonic made it, and Leica repackaged it.

I've got the MkI. Sorry I didn't grab a used MkII before the prices went sky-high. But, the MkI is still terrific as long as 12MP suffices. Particularly strong (vs. other compacts) in low light, thanks to the larger sensor and bright lens. Couple it with Godox' new IT32 mini flash and you've got a great party camera.

I read the D-Lux was first released in 2003 and the LX100 premiered in 2014? Based on that I assumed the Panasonic was the repackaged version.

That is a different D-Lux. There have been several. I don't recall which D-Lux model was a rebadged LX100. Leica last year issued an updated version of its rebadged LX100 MkII.

Greetings
I shoot with cameras that are 10-50 years old and they still work fine. I use Sigma SD14 SD15 SD1 SDQ-H or my Olympus OM2n or OM1n and you know what,....they still work fine. I still sell work and have Gallery showings. What doesn't work are people who buy new expensive gear thinking they'll become a better photographer and their work is the same. Learn to use what you have get to know how it works don't be a P shooter. Save your money and take your camera on a vacation.
Have fun
Roger

I bought the top of the mode dial of mine on amazon, and now it is brand spanking new for me...when I want precise focusing, I use the 5dlll...

I sold my MK3 Canon about three years ago and for whatever reason I still sort of regret it. Absolutely loved that thing, just was a little redundant at the time. I've actually considered getting in touch with the individual to buy it back ha