There was a time when serious photographers sneered at superzoom lenses. The old 18-200mm options earned their terrible reputation honestly: muddy corners, slow autofocus, and the kind of optical compromises that made you wonder why you bothered upgrading from a smartphone. But that era is over. Modern computer-aided lens design has produced a new generation of travel zooms that are genuinely sharp, reasonably fast, and often weather-sealed. If you have been hauling a bag full of primes through airports and hiking trails, it might be time to reconsider.
The case for a single do-it-all lens is simple. Changing glass in a crowded souk or on a windswept cliff is stressful at best and sensor-destroying at worst. Carrying ten pounds of equipment turns a leisurely vacation into an endurance test. And perhaps most importantly, the shot you miss while fumbling for a different focal length is gone forever. These modern superzooms solve all of that. You give up some edge-to-edge acuity compared to top primes, but you gain the ability to capture wide landscapes and distant details in the same moment, without ever opening your bag.
I have tested the current options across every major mount system to find the single best travel companion for each platform.
Sony E Mount (Full Frame)
The Winner: Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD
This lens changed the game when it launched, and nothing has matched it since. The headline number is that f/2.8 starting aperture. Most travel zooms begin at f/3.5 or even f/4, which limits your ability to shoot in dim restaurants or capture portraits with genuine background separation. The Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD gives you that extra stop of light at the wide end, and it holds onto usable apertures throughout most of the range.Optically, it punches well above its weight class. Corner sharpness is excellent by 35mm and remains strong through the midrange. It weighs less than Sony's own 24-105mm f/4 G lens while offering nearly twice the reach. The autofocus is quiet and confident, making it equally suitable for stills and video work.
The Alternative: Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS
If you absolutely need that 24mm wide end for architecture or landscape work, the Tamron's 28mm starting point might feel constraining. Sony's own superzoom trades the bright aperture for a wider and longer focal range. The Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS is not as optically impressive, but the versatility of true 24mm in tight European alleyways or cathedral interiors can be worth the tradeoff for certain shooters.Nikon Z Mount (Full Frame)
The Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR
Do not let the modest spec sheet fool you. This lens carries optical quality that approaches Nikon's premium S-Line glass, even though it does not officially wear that badge. Where many superzooms are clearly "kit" quality, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR delivers genuinely professional results.The 24mm wide end is a meaningful advantage over competitors that start at 28mm. That extra four millimeters makes a real difference when you are trying to capture a sweeping vista or fit an entire building into the frame from across a narrow street. The built-in VR stabilization is effective, and the weather sealing provides confidence in unpredictable conditions.
The Alternative: Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR
Nikon built something unique in the full frame mirrorless world: a 14.2x zoom in a single lens body. If your itinerary includes safari wildlife, distant mountain peaks, or architectural details high on Gothic cathedrals, that 400mm reach is genuinely transformative. You will pay for it with a slower maximum aperture at the long end and a 28mm starting point, but for certain trips, nothing else comes close to the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR.Canon RF Mount (Full Frame)
The Winner: Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM
Canon's entry delivers a true 10x zoom ratio while maintaining respectable sharpness across the range. The company leans heavily on in-camera digital corrections to handle distortion and vignetting, which some purists dislike, but the practical result is clean, usable images straight from the camera.The Nano USM autofocus motor deserves special mention. It is fast, silent, and smooth enough for video work, which makes the Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM particularly appealing for hybrid shooters who want to capture both stills and footage without changing glass.
The Alternative: Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM
This is the featherweight option for photographers who prioritize portability over reach. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM weighs almost nothing, costs significantly less than the 24-240mm, and delivers perfectly acceptable image quality. If your travel style involves a lot of walking and you rarely need telephoto reach, this compact option keeps your kit light without sacrificing too much flexibility.Fujifilm X Mount (APS-C)
The Winner: Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD
The APS-C crop factor transforms this lens into a roughly 27-450mm equivalent, which is an absurd amount of reach in a portable package. You can capture wide environmental shots and then zoom in on a bird in a distant tree without taking a single step.Beyond the range, the Tamron 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD offers impressive close-focusing capabilities with a 1:2 macro ratio. This means you can photograph intricate food presentations, exotic flowers, or interesting textures without switching to a dedicated macro lens. For travelers who want maximum flexibility, it is hard to beat.
The Alternative: Fujifilm XF 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR
The native Fujifilm option trades zoom range for build quality and integration. The "WR" designation means genuine weather resistance, and the physical aperture ring maintains that classic Fujifilm handling experience. If you are trekking through monsoon conditions or dusty desert environments, the Fujifilm XF 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR might be worth more than extra millimeters of reach.Micro Four Thirds
The Winner: Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4 IS PRO
Ask any Micro Four Thirds shooter about this lens and watch their eyes light up. The 12-100mm PRO has earned a reputation as possibly the finest superzoom ever engineered, full stop. The constant f/4 aperture throughout the entire range is rare in this category and eliminates the annoying brightness fluctuations that plague variable-aperture zooms.But the stabilization is the real magic trick. Combined with an Olympus or OM System body, the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4 IS PRO makes multi-second handheld exposures realistically achievable. Many shooters report sharp images at one to two seconds with proper technique. You can leave your tripod at home and still capture sharp images in genuinely dark conditions. For travel photography, this is a transformative capability.
The Alternative: Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3
If you need more reach than the PRO version offers, this lens delivers a staggering 24-400mm equivalent range. It functions almost like a pair of binoculars attached to your camera. The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3 is also dust and splash resistant, so it can handle rough conditions. Sharpness does not quite match the PRO model, but the ability to zoom from wide landscapes to distant wildlife without changing lenses has obvious appeal for certain travel scenarios.L Mount (Panasonic/Sigma)
The Winner: Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm f/4-7.1 Macro O.I.S.
This is the smallest and lightest full frame superzoom in its class. It fits in the palm of your hand and pairs beautifully with compact L-Mount bodies like the Lumix S9 or S5II. For hikers and backpackers who count every gram, the weight savings alone make the Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm f/4-7.1 Macro O.I.S. worth considering.The "Macro" designation indicates useful close-focusing ability, which adds another dimension of versatility. Image quality is solid throughout the range, though the relatively slow f/7.1 aperture at 200mm does limit low-light telephoto work.
The Alternative: Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S.
Photographers who prioritize consistent performance over extreme reach should consider this option. The constant f/4 aperture maintains the same exposure and depth of field characteristics from wide to telephoto, which simplifies shooting in variable conditions. The 24mm starting point is also wider than the superzoom's 28mm, which matters for landscape and architectural work. The Panasonic Lumix S 24-105mm f/4 Macro O.I.S. remains a solid choice for travelers who value reliability.The Freedom of Simplicity
The best camera is the one you have with you, and the best lens is the one that lets you capture the moment without hesitation. These modern superzooms represent a genuine revolution in optical engineering. They prove you can have serious image quality and ultimate convenience in the same package.
Will a dedicated 85mm f/1.4 produce creamier portraits? Absolutely. Will a fast 24mm prime outperform any zoom in low light? Of course. But will you have those lenses mounted and ready when a perfect moment appears during your vacation? Probably not.
Pick the lens that fits your mount, leave the rest of your gear at home, and actually enjoy your trip. The shots you will get with a single versatile lens far outnumber the theoretical shots you could have captured with a bag full of glass collecting dust in your hotel room.
9 Comments
How did you miss both new lenses for E mount? Tamron has the 25-200 and sigma has the 20-200, both have been announced for a while now.
That, and recommending the Sony 24-240, a soft lens, is a bit odd.
I have not yet figured out why there is such a push for fast glass and now on Canon and Nikon cameras being mirrorless cameras where High ISO's today are a second thought especially with all the editors having great noise reduction and with Full Frame cameras with a press of button you are in APS-C mode for a in camera zoom or in camera crop.
Back in 2019 yes I went Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3DG OS HSM C 015 and both 1.4x and 2X teleconverters and used APS-C when birding also havening to use an adapter for the Canon version lens. But I did too soon for Sony came out with its FE 200-600mm and great 1.4x and 2x Teleconverters, just to show I have been used other platforms lenses. and just for thought maybe no need for the 1.4X teleconverter due to APS-C mode is a 1.5 crop.
I got the Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS and 36 to 360 in APS-C mode back in 2015 and has been on any Sony camera I may have had through those 10 years when on walkabouts in my little tear drop bag. Yes there was a review that did not due it Justus. In the light of day or dark of night it has done a great job of capturing the light.
If I may add a lens for those who want to do some astro MW's or just a wide angle lens to pull out of their bag that is real small and light with threads for filters. Made for Sony APS-C cameras in 2013 before the A7 line came out. The E 10-18mm (15-27mm in 35mm) F4 OSS that can be used un Full Frame mode (kind of a reverse use) as 12-18mm. Not till 2017 when the 12-24mm F4 G was a 12mm available and it was heavier and larger and required an external filter holder ($ added) and and large glass filters. It is a handy little lens of indoors or out doors wide capture but my main use is MW panoramas for it is light above on a panorama rig vs the 12-24mm F4 G or the 12-24mm F2.8 GM or even the nearest 14mm F1.8 that also needs external filter holder and large filter glass. It also is great for a daytime panorama.
1. Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3DG OS HSM C 015
2-4. Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS #2 at 360mm #3 + #4 at 24mm
Surprised that you didn't push Sony's new 400-800mm zoom. Or the 50-150 f/2. I love my FE200-600mm G lens when I point it at the night sky. I may buy the 400-800mm for the same reason. The 50-150mm f/2 intrigues me, as well. Now that I'm in a wheelchair, I think it would be a great run, gun, and only one lens. I can throw my 24mm lens in if I have to take obligatory, wide angle group shots.
The headline said every camera mount but you neglected Pentax which has very little competition in the DSLR market.
Also missing M and we all know it's the 35 summicron
I think, for MFT as an alternative to the Oly 12-100mm, the Panasonic 14-140mm ii should have been mentioned. It has a very decent range with very good overall image quality (better than the Oly 12-200).
Saying that Sony f/4 lens don't work in dim light is ridiculous. I worked my 24-105mm f/4 kit lens to death before I replaced it with the 24-70mm f/2.8. I have some great night shots from when I was a street walker. I used nothing, but the light that was there. I never once felt that I needed to reshoot the scenes. You also don't need a 200+mm zoom. With the clarity of most sensors, today, you can crop in post. Also, vacationers use a camera the majority of the time for close shots, less than 50m. It's better to buy a decent f/2.8 zoom lens that will be more suitable for your higher percentage shots.
I use a Sony a7iii, having purchasing it as a retirement gift to myself. I initially used the Sony 24-240 lens that was terribly heavy and expensive. My biggest complaint was that it was soft everywhere - even in manual focusing mode. And, I mean everywhere. After a month of schlepping it around, I went back to the camera store where I purchased them both and showed them the images. After their testing they agreed that there was a problem with the lens and said that I would have to deal with Sony directly. That was a waste of time. They were going to charge me for shipping both ways and indicated that unless there was a true manufacturing defect, that nothing would be done. I wound up selling it for a huge loss on eBay (after disclosing my concerns) and purchased the Tamron lens you reviewed. It has been 5 years and I couldn't be more pleased. I find it super sharp everywhere. If there is any edge softness, I can't appreciate it. Even if there is, it never affects my image because, after all, who views photos with a straightedge in hand. I wish it was a little wider because there are times I would like a 24mm image but it's otherwise fantastic. It is much lighter and a whole lot cheaper in price. Best lens I have ever owned during my 50+ years behind the lens.