Photography Gear

Shooting portraits at f/2 with a 200mm lens produces backgrounds so obliterated they barely look real. If you shoot portraits and background separation is a priority, the focal length and aperture combination you choose will define your entire look.

When Olympus sold its imaging division to Japan Industrial Partners on January 1, 2021, the new company was called OM Digital Solutions. The OM SYSTEM product brand arrived later, announced in October 2021 as the name the company would put on its cameras going forward. Most of the photography press wrote the obituary in advance of either event. The division had been unprofitable for years. Olympus itself, after more than eighty years of making cameras, was exiting the business. Micro Four Thirds had lost the sensor-size argument in the public imagination to APS-C and full frame. The buyer was a private equity firm, not a camera manufacturer. The standard expectation was managed decline: a few years of catalog padding, a thinning lens roadmap, and eventual fade.

APS-C cameras are quickly becoming the main choice for everyday photography. I've owned a Nikon Z50 for seven years now, and it's still my favorite everyday camera, especially for travel, street, and urban photography. But finding lenses for it has always been a problem.

Choosing a dedicated snapshot camera changes how you shoot, and the Ricoh GR IV is one of the more interesting options for that role right now. This video makes a compelling case that serious shooters are missing something by always being in "photography mode," and that having a second camera specifically for personal snapshots can fill a gap that even a smartphone can't.

The idea that full frame is the "serious photographer's" destination has shaped how people spend money on gear for decades. In 2026, that assumption deserves a hard look, because the lens market, sensor technology, and real-world shooting habits have all shifted in ways that change the math.

The Fujifilm X100VI has been supply-constrained for more than two years. The camera launched in February 2024, and as of April 2026, availability remains spotty: Fujifilm's own US shop typically shows it as "Notify Me" rather than in stock, and major retailers list the camera as temporarily out of stock with rolling expected availability windows rather than steady inventory. The company raised the US price from $1,599 to $1,799, and the camera still moves for above MSRP on the secondary market. Two years of reported shortages is not a production problem that got solved. It is a demand problem that Fujifilm is openly uninterested in solving.

The Fujifilm X-E5 sits in an interesting spot in the Fujifilm lineup: it has the same 40-megapixel sensor as the Fujifilm X-T5 but in a body closer in size to the X100 series, with interchangeable lenses. After a year of daily use, including replacing the X-T5 as his main body, Mitch Lally has a clear picture of exactly who this camera is for and where it falls short.

Leica and affordable rarely share the same conversation, but the Leica M240 might be the exception worth paying attention to. It's a full frame, M-mount digital rangefinder that costs a fraction of what modern Leica bodies go for, and it still delivers the core experience that makes these cameras worth owning.

The Nano-X Pro filter system proves there's still a place for those who try to get it right in camera.

The Sony a7 V is one of the most talked-about hybrid cameras of the past years. What actually happens when you run it through real paid work over an extended period?

B&H Photo is running some aggressive discounts across cameras, lighting, support, storage, and accessories this week. We dug through hundreds of active DealZone listings, sale prices, and lowest-in-180-day markdowns to find 30 that are worth your attention, sorted by a combination of percentage off and absolute dollar savings. These deals are time-limited, most running through the next seven days, so act quickly on anything that catches your eye. Whether you are building out a studio, restocking expendables, or hunting for a serious gear upgrade, there is something here for you.

Somewhere around 2010, camera design stopped mattering to the photography industry. The DSLR era had produced bodies defined by ergonomics rather than aesthetics, and the first mirrorless wave carried forward the same logic. Cameras were tools, tools looked like tools, and any photographer who cared about how a camera looked was suspected of being a poseur. The mainstream press reinforced the assumption. Reviewers evaluated bodies by their grip comfort, control layouts, button feel, and weather sealing, and any discussion of aesthetics was treated as either irrelevant or faintly embarrassing.

Want to reclaim your desk space and maybe even reduce the pain in your neck by optimizing your viewing angle? Consider a monitor arm. Here, we take a look at the HUANUO FlowLift™ Single Monitor Mount (formerly SS6, but still model HNSS6). I also discuss the HUANUO Universal VESA Mount Adapter Kit (Model HNMUA4), which was needed for my particular monitor. How well did they work? How easy were they to install?

Choosing a camera system means committing to an ecosystem, and for most systems, that means locking yourself into one manufacturer's lenses. Micro Four Thirds breaks that rule in a way that has real, practical consequences for what you can carry and shoot.

The Lumix S1 II sits at $3,200 list price, currently discounted to around $2,900, and it's trying to compete with video-focused cameras from Canon, Sony, and Nikon on both features and value. Whether it actually pulls that off depends heavily on a few specific trade-offs that aren't obvious from the spec sheet.

Picking a compact, affordable 35mm lens for Sony full frame is harder than it looks. The Samyang AF 35mm f/1.8 FE sits at around $400 and promises a lightweight option for Sony E-mount shooters, but whether the image quality backs up that price is a different question.

After three decades as a professional filmmaker and photographer, I have learned a lot of things. Most of them, I learned the hard way.

Photography has a spending problem, and it starts early. The moment you get serious enough to move past the kit lens and the auto mode, the industry opens a firehose of recommendations pointed directly at your wallet. Better bodies, faster glass, studio lighting, editing software, bags, straps, filters, presets, printers, and accessories that promise to make your work look professional before you have figured out what "professional" means for you.

Viltrox's 35mm f/1.2 Lab was already one of the sharpest, most capable lenses in its class when it launched. The new "N" version strips out the OLED screen and replaces the unconventional control ring with a traditional aperture ring, and that single change makes a lens that was optically exceptional finally handle the way it should.

The Sony RX1R Mark III launched to a lot of ridicule. At $5,100 with no IBIS, no tilt screen, and a battery that's been around since 2013, the internet had a field day, and honestly, the criticism wasn't wrong on the specs alone.

Canon and Sony each make a flagship 35mm lens, and on paper they're remarkably close in size, weight, price, and optical spec. But close on paper doesn't always mean close in practice, and the differences that do exist could matter depending on how you shoot.

The 85mm prime is the rare lens that almost every working portrait photographer owns, eventually. It is the focal length that does the most flattering work on faces, the easiest one to recommend to a portrait beginner, and the lens most photographers reach for when they want to make a person look the way they want to be seen.

Choosing a normal-length prime for your Fujifilm X system sounds straightforward until you realize there are seven legitimate autofocus options sitting in roughly the same focal length range, each with a different price, build, and rendering character. The gap between the best and worst of them is smaller than you'd expect, but the differences in autofocus reliability and real-world usability are anything but trivial.

The Nikon ZR is a camera that has generated a lot of conversation since Nikon acquired Red Cinema, but most of that conversation focuses on specs and codec comparisons. What's harder to find is a perspective from someone who actually shot on a Red camera for years, sold it, moved on, and then picked up the ZR expecting to be underwhelmed.

The Fujifilm X-T30 III sits at $1,000 body only, positioning it as one of Fujifilm's most accessible entry points into the X-series system. For that price, you're getting a 26-megapixel APS-C camera with some video specs that don't match what you'd expect from a camera in this range.

The Pentax K-3 Mark III was officially discontinued in Japan in January 2025. The Monochrome variant has been more complicated: B&H's original black Monochrome listing is now marked "No Longer Available," though it points buyers to a current matte-black Monochrome listing still shown as in stock. After roughly four years of production, the K-3 Mark III is being phased out in stages rather than discontinued cleanly, and the last major APS-C DSLR from a major manufacturer is winding down. By the standard industry narrative, this should be the end of the story. DSLRs are dead. Mirrorless has won. Move on. Except the story is more complicated than that. 

Choosing between a 24-70mm and a 70-200mm zoom is one of the most common lens decisions you'll face when building a kit. Both are professional staples, both are genuinely useful, and neither obviously replaces the other.

There is a thing Leica does that no other camera manufacturer is willing to do, and it is the thing that makes Leica interesting even to photographers who will never own one. Leica refuses to pretend to be what it is not.

Most photography now lives online. In the feed, in algorithms, in a constant stream of images. This is where the idea of what a photographer is supposed to need gets formed. Cheap did not become better. It became sufficient.

After testing more than 800 lenses, Christopher Frost has narrowed his personal favorites for portrait work down to three. The picks span a wild range of price points and design philosophies, which makes the list genuinely worth paying attention to.

Choosing an everyday carry camera is harder than it looks. You're balancing size, image quality, and price, and most cameras force you to sacrifice at least one of them.

When Nikon announced the Z9 in late 2021, the camera was treated by most of the photography press as Nikon's "we are still here" moment. The brand had spent the early mirrorless years getting beaten in feature comparisons by Sony, criticized for slow autofocus updates, and described in obituary-adjacent language by gear reviewers who had decided Sony had won the format war. The Z9 was supposed to prove Nikon could still build a flagship. It did. Then something more interesting happened over the next four years.

The Horizon 202 is a Soviet-era swing lens panoramic camera that produces a field of view roughly equivalent to 14mm on a 35mm camera, with almost none of the distortion you'd expect from an ultra wide angle lens at that focal length. If you've ever wanted to capture an entire mountain range in a single frame on film, this is the kind of camera that makes that possible.

The Nikkor Z 14-30mm f/4 S has been on the market since 2019, and it remains the wide angle zoom that ends up on more Nikon Z mount cameras than probably any other. At its current discounted price of around $1,100, the calculus of buying it versus something like the Nikkor Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S at roughly $2,000 gets very interesting very fast.

Leica is the only professional camera company to offer three 35mm film cameras. These cameras, M-A, M6, and MP, are popular among the fan base despite the dominance of digital photography in the past two decades. If you have a few dollars to spare, you have a rare opportunity to own an original MP camera once owned by the photographer known as the first paparazzo.

Choosing between a 35mm and 40mm prime lens sounds like splitting hairs, but if you shoot in tight spaces, near cliffs, or anywhere you can't step back, that small difference in field of view can determine whether you get the shot or go home empty-handed. James Popsys has spent years shooting 40mm primes across multiple systems and recently started questioning whether 35mm deserves a longer look.

Megapixel counts dominate camera marketing, and most buying decisions reflect that. But the actual difference between a 24-megapixel sensor and a 50-megapixel one is almost certainly smaller than you've been led to believe.

The Tamron 35-100mm f/2.8 sits in an interesting spot: it's compact and light enough to travel with, but fast enough to handle portraits, events, and low-light shooting. At around $899, it's priced to compete with other mid-range zooms, and whether it delivers enough to justify that price is genuinely worth understanding before you buy.

Choosing a 35mm f/1.4 lens for Sony E-mount means navigating a short but competitive list, and the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art just reshuffled that list significantly. The Mark II version makes a strong case against both its predecessor and Sony's own G Master offering.

In photography, style is often discussed in terms of subject matter, color, or composition. Certainly important aspects to consider, but much less frequently do we talk about something equally decisive: focal length. Yet if you look closely at the history of urban landscape photography, focal length reveals itself as a kind of quiet grammar.

The Tamron 35-100mm f/2.8 Di III VXD is a fast standard zoom for Sony E-mount and Nikon Z-mount cameras, priced at $899 for Sony and $929 for Nikon. That longer reach comes at a direct cost: you lose the wide end compared to a typical 24-70mm, and whether that tradeoff works for you depends entirely on how you shoot.

Picking a 50mm lens for your Nikon Z system just got more complicated. The Viltrox 55mm f/1.8 from the Evo series is an apochromatic lens priced at $370, and it's gunning directly for the Nikkor Z 50mm f/1.8 S.

The Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR II is a significant lens for anyone shooting in the X system. It's a red badge lens, which means Fujifilm's highest standard, and the original version set a high bar that this new iteration has to clear.

The Sony a7 V sits at $2,900 and bills itself as an enthusiast camera, but its feature set tells a different story. Whether you shoot stills, video, or both, what's inside this body has real implications for how far it can take your work.

The Fujifilm X-T5 has been on the market for nearly four years, and the question of whether it still holds up is worth asking seriously. At 40 megapixels in an APS-C body priced well below full frame alternatives, it sits in an unusual spot.

I realize that articles about older cameras don't trend nearly as hard as shiny new toys. But my recent purchase of the Nikon Zf has paid off in more ways than I could have ever imagined.

Choosing the right Sony camera is genuinely hard. The lineup spans everything from pocket-sized compacts to flagship sports bodies, and picking the wrong one means spending money on specs you'll never use or missing features you actually need.

Choosing a 35mm lens for a Sony camera used to mean paying a premium for the Sony FE 35mm f/1.4 GM or settling for something that fell short in one area or another. The Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG DN Art changes that math in a meaningful way, and the second version of this lens is smaller, lighter, and improved across nearly every metric compared to its predecessor.

The Viltrox 35mm f/1.2 is already a well-regarded fast prime, but Viltrox has now released a revised version called the AF 35mm f/1.2 STF N, dropping the LED display and swapping the old control ring for a proper aperture ring. If you shoot Sony E-mount and have been watching this lens, the changes are worth understanding before you spend $999.